Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Thu, 12 Oct 2006 11:56:02 -0500:
> Grant Goodyear wrote:
>> Seemant Kulleen wrote: [Thu Oct 12 2006, 08:50:33AM CDT]
>>> A typical example of the institutionalisation of the project [...]
>>
>> A minor correction h
On Thursday 12 October 2006 02:19, Michael Cummings wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 08:35 -0700, Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh wrote:
> > Eldad Zack wrote:
> > > Christian Heim wrote:
> > >> Its my pleasure to introduce to you Alon "alonbl" Bar-Lev, the latest
> > >> addition joining to help out with th
Do not top post, is rude.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top-posting
Peter Weber wrote:
> You seem to think that the discussion is around you, and your work :-)
>
> It is about Gentoo, please keep this in mind. Nobody says YOU have to
> make the work, or that you are doing sth. wrong. You could do
On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 20:06 +0200, Peter Weber wrote:
> - The same installtion (networkless!) possibilites should be offered to
> the people who install via the shell (the oldschool an most often used
> way i believe), the ncurses-installer and the gtk-installer. I
> personally think a real Stage-3
> I have a couple of questions:
>
> 1) Does this sound like a good idea?
>
> 2) Does anyone feel like pouring his/her troubleshooting skills into
>content for my program?
1.) maybe microsofts troubleshooter sucks, it never solved a single problem I
had. this will only be a good Idea if we'r
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 17:41:20 +0200 Natanael Copa
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 16:18 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| > On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 14:24:36 +0200 Natanael Copa
| > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > | btw.. I keep hearing about this paladius. Is it more
| > | script-friendl
Hi,
I've noticed in the past that a lot of people come to irc with problems
in some area (say networking) that are easy to solve just by first
asking a number of questions to identify the problem and then providing
the solution.
I've always liked the way Microsoft put these troubleshooters in the
четвер, 12. жовтень 2006 10:47, Stuart Herbert написав:
> This isn't going to bring any benefits to anyone. If you want to help
> users find docs on programming languages on Gentoo (assuming there
> _are_ any users who don't know how to Google for such things), just
> get the docs team to organise
Hi, im sorry about "creating" a flamewar. But their are a view points
that disturb me really:
- The same installtion (networkless!) possibilites should be offered to
the people who install via the shell (the oldschool an most often used
way i believe), the ncurses-installer and the gtk-installer.
Grant Goodyear wrote:
> Seemant Kulleen wrote: [Thu Oct 12 2006, 08:50:33AM CDT]
>> A typical example of the institutionalisation of the project is myself.
>>
>> Had anyone just bothered to send me an email I would have replied.
>> "no, he's gone, terminate the account."that part works.
>>
>> B
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 11:03:41 -0500
Andrew Gaffney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's "paludis", and no, the API is currently C++ only, afaik. There
> are ruby bindings in the works, though. The other alternative,
> pkgcore, has a python API...as does portage itself. None of the
> options have an in
Seemant Kulleen wrote: [Thu Oct 12 2006, 08:50:33AM CDT]
> A typical example of the institutionalisation of the project is myself.
>
> Had anyone just bothered to send me an email I would have replied.
> "no, he's gone, terminate the account."that part works.
>
> But.
>
> You could have told
Natanael Copa wrote:
btw.. I keep hearing about this paladius. Is it more script-friendly
than emerge?
It's "paludis", and no, the API is currently C++ only, afaik. There are ruby
bindings in the works, though. The other alternative, pkgcore, has a python
API...as does portage itself. None of
On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 16:18 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 14:24:36 +0200 Natanael Copa
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | btw.. I keep hearing about this paladius. Is it more script-friendly
> | than emerge?
>
> Once we get the Ruby interface fleshed out it will be...
What abo
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 09:52:42 +0100 "Stuart Herbert"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On 10/11/06, Stephen Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > We also use space-delimited depend atoms everywhere else. It makes
| > no sense to break that when a comma works equally well.
|
| I'm sorry, are you telling
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 14:24:36 +0200 Natanael Copa
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| btw.. I keep hearing about this paladius. Is it more script-friendly
| than emerge?
Once we get the Ruby interface fleshed out it will be...
--
Ciaran McCreesh
Mail: ciaranm at ciaranm.org
Web
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 10:00:05 +0100 "Stuart Herbert"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On 10/11/06, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > Not an issue for me. It's an issue for random people writing
| > scripts, for people using command line things and for people who
| > don't want to use a full
Brian Harring wrote:
> cat/pkg[use1_on,-use2_off,-use3_on]
You mean "use3_on", without the minus sign, right?
Cheers,
-jkt
--
cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Seemant Kulleen napisał(a):
> Dear All,
>
> I'm forwarding this on behalf of Spider. If anyone would like to send a
> message to him, please respond to me privately and I'll forward your
> wishes along.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Seemant
>
> --- BEGIN
>
> Well, I guess the time has come to say farew
Dear All,
I'm forwarding this on behalf of Spider. If anyone would like to send a
message to him, please respond to me privately and I'll forward your
wishes along.
Thanks,
Seemant
--- BEGIN
Well, I guess the time has come to say farewell.
Not without a slight taste of bitterness in my m
On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 22:17 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 22:08:31 +0100 "Stuart Herbert"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | On 10/11/06, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | > Spaces in dep atoms would be highly evil, since it'd mean they were
> | > no longer simply s
I know what unsupported means chris. what I'm referring to though are
bugs that would affect i686 as well. but possibly get closed because a
dev, like yourself, requested emerge --info and saw it was build on <
i686 and closes it for that reason. probably RESOLVED WONTFIX .
On 10/11/06, Chris Gia
This isn't going to bring any benefits to anyone. If you want to help
users find docs on programming languages on Gentoo (assuming there
_are_ any users who don't know how to Google for such things), just
get the docs team to organise 'Programming Languages on Gentoo' docs
category on [1]. _That
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 09:52:42 +0100
"Stuart Herbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm sorry, are you telling everyone that it's too difficult for you to
> write an ungreedy regex that also tests for the possibility of a list
> bounded by [ and ] being part of an atom?
No. I'm saying that it's more
As per summary, net-im/kopete is going away (again).
For a while upstrem released some versions out of the KDE release cycle
(0.12_alpha through 0.12.2), but now 0.12.3 was merged again inside
kdenetwork-3.5.5, so the point of having it in net-im is gone again.
As I've heard the most foolish req
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 19:33:16 +0200, George Shapovalov wrote:
> Hi gang.
>
> [snip]
>
> The principal list of individual TLPs (as they stand now) is below:
> Common Lisp
> eselect
> java
> perl
> php
> python
> Ada -- to be added
Hi,
if you go ahead with it, we'll probably want to add a ml
On 10/11/06, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Not an issue for me. It's an issue for random people writing scripts,
for people using command line things and for people who don't want to
use a full parser framework for some quick hack. There's no need to
make things harder for random dev
George Shapovalov wrote:
> Well, it seemed like a small tool, having a TLP for which is a gross
> overkill,
eselect is anything but a small tool...
I'd just reorder docs in a more rational way but let our flat tlp as is.
lu
--
Luca Barbato
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu
On 10/11/06, Stephen Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We also use space-delimited depend atoms everywhere else. It makes no
sense to break that when a comma works equally well.
I'm sorry, are you telling everyone that it's too difficult for you to
write an ungreedy regex that also tests for t
On 10/12/06, George Shapovalov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Funnily I already got questions like "is this thing only to move stuff around?
I would be all for it if it had a bit more meat". I added that PPS expecting
questions like that would be asked. Of course, realistically I do not
think anythin
середа, 11. жовтень 2006 22:30, Matthew Kennedy Ви написали:
> I think this proposal is OK even it is just to organize the top level
> listing a bit better. It seems like a real mix right now -- Council
> next to Common Lisp, PR next to Python and so on etc.
Yea, this is exactly why I want to orga
середа, 11. жовтень 2006 23:12, Stuart Herbert Ви написали:
> We don't need a management hierarchy just to bring some structure to
> the docs on the website.I don't see any benefit in creating a TLP
> for programming languages. If we were to move programming languages
> around, for example, I'
32 matches
Mail list logo
