On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 07:49:22PM -0700, Jason Wever wrote:
Please triple check what you want to commit and verify that you don't do
any of the following (which are punishable by death):
1) remove the last ebuild that is keyworded for a given arch, especially
when resulting in broken
On Monday 30 October 2006 10:26, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
A single person doesn't constitute a team [1]. More than one person
does...
[1] Unless you're SpanKY.
You forget that vapier also works with SpanKY ;)
--
Roy Marples [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo/Linux Developer (baselayout, networking)
--
On 10/30/06, Jason Wever [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please triple check what you want to commit and verify that you don't do
any of the following (which are punishable by death):
1) remove the last ebuild that is keyworded for a given arch, especially
when resulting in broken dependencies.
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 00:28 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 07:49:22PM -0700, Jason Wever wrote:
Please triple check what you want to commit and verify that you don't do
any of the following (which are punishable by death):
1) remove the last ebuild that is
I wouldn't do it until mplayerplug-in works on it. I just realized it
doesn't, last night. lot of people would probably be upset if it were
stabilized. but they couldn't watch movies.
On 10/29/06, Josh Saddler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michal Kurgan wrote:
Hello!
Recently new firefox-2.0 was
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 00:28:29 -0800 Robin H. Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| To generalize on Francesco's email, how long should developers wait
| for minority arches to mark stuff stable, after a security bug, and
| then a reminder more than 4 months later?
Indefinitely. There's no harm
On Monday 30 October 2006 14:23, Ferris McCormick wrote:
I might be mistaken, but I believe sparc responds pretty quickly to
security bugs, either by taking the requested action or by explaining
why the requested action is impossible (i.e., build problems).
Yes, the Sparc team is rather quick
qlist ${CPV} | scanelf -L -n -q -F '%n #F' | tr , ' ' | xargs qfile -C |
sort -u
This oneliner does more or less what checkrdeps does ...
Didn't know it's so simple. Idea of my script was to also show on which level
and by what these rdpes are satisfied, which can help keeping your rdeps
Tach Christian, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID)
Christian Heim schrieb:
Its my pleasure to introduce to you Christian Faulhammer (also known as
opfer), our latest addition helping with xemacs and the x86 monkeys.
Please! Don't! Not XEmacs! Pure GNU Emacs, nothing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Just a heads up...
This is part of the reason that dbus .9x is still p.masked.
We are moving from dbus-core back to dbus - dbus will NOT be a meta
package for dbus .9x. It will be the core daemon. You should be
depending on either just the
Matthew Kennedy wrote:
No one is working on the Scheme herd in Gentoo. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
includes only me, but I'm not doing anything with Scheme and don't
really care to either.
Several of our Scheme implementations in Portage are out of date,
(chicken, gambit, drscheme, bigloo and, dare I
On Sat, 2006-10-28 at 08:28 +0200, George Shapovalov wrote:
Wanna guess how many of those happen to be stale?
I would suspect fewer than you think. As an example, I have a few
packages which belong to no herd, but have me listed as maintainer.
Many of the no-herd packages are the same. Not
On Sat, 2006-10-28 at 03:05 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 28 October 2006 02:46, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 08:11:37AM +0200, George Shapovalov wrote:
One of the reasons herds were introduced was to explicitly see what
packages lack maintenance. It is
Alternate subject: On the sudden appearance of USE=X for tons of stuff
I really want to use font.eclass in x-modular.eclass to get rid of a lot
of code duplication and more possible bugs. Problem is, it brings in
IUSE=X for every single X package. I cannot figure out how to prevent
this. Setting
понеділок, 30. жовтень 2006 17:16, Chris Gianelloni Ви написали:
Well, we enforce the maintainer tag if herd is no-herd. Then, we only
With this explicit requirement I think it should be Ok.
allow valid devs, and maintainer-needed in maintainer.
Should we also disallow adding new
On Mon, 2006-30-10 at 08:26 -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Alternate subject: On the sudden appearance of USE=X for tons of stuff
I really want to use font.eclass in x-modular.eclass to get rid of a lot
of code duplication and more possible bugs. Problem is, it brings in
IUSE=X for every
On Mon, 2006-30-10 at 17:40 +0100, George Shapovalov wrote:
понеділок, 30. жовтень 2006 17:16, Chris Gianelloni Ви написали:
allow valid devs, and maintainer-needed in maintainer.
Should we also disallow adding new no-herd/maintainer-needed ebuilds?
(As the apparent use of maintainer-needed
понеділок, 30. жовтень 2006 17:49, Olivier Crete Ви написали:
Should we also disallow adding new no-herd/maintainer-needed ebuilds?
(As the apparent use of maintainer-needed is to track the ebuilds already
in the tree that need some love).
Isn't adding an ebuild without setting oneself or
On Monday 30 October 2006 17:26, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Anyone got any ideas? The only one I have is to add significant missing
functionality to font.eclass and switch every font package over that
instead of x-modular.eclass.
if [[ ${CATEGORY} == media-font ]]; then
fonteclass=font
endif
I really want to use font.eclass in x-modular.eclass to get rid of a lot
of code duplication and more possible bugs. Problem is, it brings in
IUSE=X for every single X package. I cannot figure out how to prevent
this. Setting IUSE= after the inherit in x-modular.eclass is not enough.
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 11:09:53AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Sat, 2006-10-28 at 08:28 +0200, George Shapovalov wrote:
Wanna guess how many of those happen to be stale?
I would suspect fewer than you think. As an example, I have a few
packages which belong to no herd, but have me
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 18:44:30 +0100 Piotr Jaroszyński [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| I really want to use font.eclass in x-modular.eclass to get rid of
| a lot of code duplication and more possible bugs. Problem is, it
| brings in IUSE=X for every single X package. I cannot figure out
| how to
And it doesn't work.
Wanna bet? Of course you must put it in the x-modular.eclass, but I thought
that's quite obvious as spyderous was talking about adding IUSE= to that
eclass.
--
Piotr Jaroszyński
Gentoo Developer
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:21:46 +0100 Piotr Jaroszyński [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| And it doesn't work.
|
| Wanna bet? Of course you must put it in the x-modular.eclass, but I
| thought that's quite obvious as spyderous was talking about adding
| IUSE= to that eclass.
Yes, I do want to bet. You
Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 00:28:29 -0800 Robin H. Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| To generalize on Francesco's email, how long should developers wait
| for minority arches to mark stuff stable, after a security bug, and
| then a reminder more than 4 months later?
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Your solution is approximately on par with fixing a wobbly chair by
sawing off all four legs and then attaching what's left to a crocodile.
+1 for creativity and making me literally laugh out loud
--
Andrew Gaffney
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 20:09:56 +0100 Jakub Moc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
| On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 00:28:29 -0800 Robin H. Johnson
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| | To generalize on Francesco's email, how long should developers
| | wait for minority arches to mark stuff
Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
| | 5 months of no response from the arches says something is wrong on
| | their side.
|
| Or it tells you where their priorities lie...
|
| Sure. So they don't need the keywords nor the package.
No no. They might need the package, just not necessarily a
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 21:04:47 +0100
Piotr Jaroszyński [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just what do you think will happen when Portage internals change?
This has happened several times with those variables?
E_IUSE was added in 2.0.50-r10 or r11 and was never changed.
...yet. Past Portage releases
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 20:50:06 +0100 Jakub Moc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
| | | 5 months of no response from the arches says something is
| | | wrong on their side.
| |
| | Or it tells you where their priorities lie...
| |
| | Sure. So they don't need the
...yet. Past Portage releases don't have it. Future Portage releases may
not. Other package managers don't. Using it at all is to intentionally
screw around with things that ebuilds should not know or need to, is
asking for trouble, and will have a certain group on your back as soon
as they
| Just what do you think will happen when another eclass sets
| IUSE=Xaw3d?
|
| Specially for you and your pink elephants:
| E_IUSE=${E_IUSE// X }
| E_IUSE=${E_IUSE#X }
| E_IUSE=${E_IUSE% X}
No go. Arbitrary whitespace is allowed.
I thought that you really know what you are talking
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 21:30:56 +0100 Piotr Jaroszyński [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Why there is always *someone* who wants to win a pink elephant in the
| last word contest?
We want to be damned sure that neither you nor anyone else is going to
persist with this kind of stupidity.
--
Ciaran
Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
| As you have might have noticed, they already have a newer version
| stable. But apparently asking them to respond on a bug within 5 months
| is way too much. :P
Well yes, since there's no clear link between bugs and packages. Things
can get stabled incidentally
E_IUSE=${E_IUSE// X } - deletes every X with whitespace around it.
This should be E_IUSE=${E_IUSE// X / }.
--
Piotr Jaroszyński
Gentoo Developer
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Hello Piotr
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 09:40:28PM +0100, Piotr Jaroszyński wrote:
E_IUSE=${E_IUSE// X } - deletes every X with whitespace around it.
What happens if someone uses newlines, horizontal tabs, vertical tabs or
any other whitespace character instead of spaces? Boom.
Greets,
Michael
--
Whitespace. Not space.
E_IUSE=$'foo\tX'
Ok, you are right here. Sorry for saying that you don't know what you are
talking about, it seems you do. But don't assume that everyone else don't.
And for future you could be more specific, Doesn't work, esp. If something
do work(not the right way
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 21:46:33 +0100 Jakub Moc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
| | As you have might have noticed, they already have a newer version
| | stable. But apparently asking them to respond on a bug within 5
| | months is way too much. :P
|
| Well yes, since
Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
| What on earth are you talking about here? And why almost 6 months is
| not enough for someone to respond on a bug with a simple we'll only
| support newer versions and don't care about MySQL 4.0.x any more, go
| drop it?
Priorities. The arch teams could be too
Hello,I have to make a Live ebuild (from a CVS repository). But econf don't find the configure script. !!! no configure script found .The configure file is into ${WORKDIR}/package/, I have defined ${S} here, but no result.
Thanks for advance if you have any idea. -- ~| klessou |
And this is the point: Your definition of 'works' is (in my eyes) at
least sloppy. If it doesn't work for all sensible cases, it shouldn't
be labelled as 'works'.
Does dirty portage-specific hack mean That's my bulletproof solution for
that problem? I didn't mean that and I hope that's
Piotr Jaroszyński wrote:
Just for fun(=I wouldn't use it in ebuild/eclass):
Sorry, but this mailing list is not really the best place for just for
fun bash foo. I suggest you take it somewhere else.
--
Kind Regards,
Simon Stelling
Gentoo/AMD64 Developer
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Sorry, but this mailing list is not really the best place for just for
fun bash foo. I suggest you take it somewhere else.
Actually that was a question which whitespaces are allowed in IUSE, so I think
it's not the worst place for it. Especially if you count the number of flame
senseless posts
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 22:44 +0100, KLessou wrote:
Hello,
I have to make a Live ebuild (from a CVS repository). But econf don't
find the configure script.
!!! no configure script found .
The configure file is into ${WORKDIR}/package/, I have defined ${S}
here, but no result.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
To whomever added the oracle use flag,
Please mask it on all architectures Oracle doesn't support on Linux. Or
better yet, mask it everywhere and only unmask it on the architectures
that support Oracle.
Thanks,
- --
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc
Everything else below is ugly.
--
Chris White
Gentoo Developer aka:
xx (Scissors Were Here) xx
pgpSSQTAPnIyc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 18:46:25 -0500 Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| I'm actually going to agree with jakub here. I wouldn't even say
| they need to fix the bug; but just acknowledge that they even read it
| or paid attention or hey we are working on it or hey we don't give
| a flying rats
On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 05:23:50PM +0200, arfrever wrote:
In connection with latest globalization of mplayer USE flag I would like to
ask for globalizing cairo, openexr and udev USE flags. These flags are used
by enough amount of packages.
I vote for a 'libnotify' global USE flag. It is
48 matches
Mail list logo
