-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger wrote:
| On Sunday 30 March 2008, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
|>> On Sun, 30 Mar 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote:
|>>> And IMHO the "emacs" USE flag should not be used here:
|>>>
|>>> $ ./configure -hs
|>>> Configuration of Leafpad 0.8.12:
|>>
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 30 Mar
2008 20:39:14 -0400:
> there is no package-manager specificness here. it's already completely
> doable from a user perspective, just having it in the ebuild makes my
> life and users' lives easier. i'm
On Sunday 30 March 2008, Mark Loeser wrote:
> Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > On Sunday 30 March 2008, Mark Loeser wrote:
> > > Actually, I'd say this should just be removed. If a user wants to
> > > apply a patch, they can put their own ebuild into an overlay and do it
> > > themselv
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 01:06:02AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 17:02:16 -0700
> Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > But the PV does.
> >
> > PV varying first of all, isn't incredibly grand from where I'm
> > sitting- yet more any versionator style code has to ac
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2008-03-30 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
dev-java/cryptix2008-03-24 22:00:11 caster
dev-java/cryptix-asn1-bin 2008-03-24 22:00:12 caster
dev-java/cryptix-jce-bin20
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 17:02:16 -0700
Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But the PV does.
>
> PV varying first of all, isn't incredibly grand from where I'm
> sitting- yet more any versionator style code has to account for.
> Second, so what? We're talking about 15 ebuilds here. It's n
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:46:33AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 16:40:46 -0700
> Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > i dont particularly care about -r0, i'm just stating that banning
> > > _alpha0/etc... is not acceptable.
> >
> > Lay out your reasons please; the
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 16:40:46 -0700
Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > i dont particularly care about -r0, i'm just stating that banning
> > _alpha0/etc... is not acceptable.
>
> Lay out your reasons please; the meaning doesn't differ (same version
> due to implicit 0 after all)
But th
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 02:59:39PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sunday 30 March 2008, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > those arent the same thing. -r# is a Gentoo-specific revision
> > > marking. _alpha/_rc/etc... are used to track upstream. if upstr
Petteri Räty wrote:
Joining us from the land of the pyramids, we have Ahmed "b33fc0d3"
Ammar.
w3l(0m3 4b04rd, 4hm3d.
(h33r5,
-jk7
--
cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Ciaran McCreesh kirjoitti:
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 17:18:44 -0400
Mark Loeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If it is something we want to move forward with, it should be
introduced at the package manager level instead of being an in-tree
package manager specific feature.
cat /etc/paludis/hooks/ebuild
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 17:18:44 -0400
Mark Loeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If it is something we want to move forward with, it should be
> introduced at the package manager level instead of being an in-tree
> package manager specific feature.
cat /etc/paludis/hooks/ebuild_unpack_post/patches.bash
Mark Loeser schrieb:
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
that's actually exactly what i'm encouraging. i'm not worried about such
issues as they're easily resolved by people posting the full build log.
Which is great, but I think this is something we should discuss and
figure out if this
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sunday 30 March 2008, Mark Loeser wrote:
> > Actually, I'd say this should just be removed. If a user wants to apply
> > a patch, they can put their own ebuild into an overlay and do it
> > themselves (presumably if they want to patch something, they'l
On Sunday 30 March 2008, Mark Loeser wrote:
> Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > On 17:26 Sat 29 Mar , Mike Frysinger (vapier) wrote:
> > > 1.1 sys-apps/iproute2/iproute2-2.6.24.20080108.ebuild
> > >
> > > file :
> > > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/
Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On 17:26 Sat 29 Mar , Mike Frysinger (vapier) wrote:
> > 1.1 sys-apps/iproute2/iproute2-2.6.24.20080108.ebuild
> >
> > file :
> > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-apps/iproute2/iproute2-2.6.24.20080108.ebuild?rev=
On Sunday 30 March 2008, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > those arent the same thing. -r# is a Gentoo-specific revision
> > marking. _alpha/_rc/etc... are used to track upstream. if upstream
> > uses _alpha0, then it makes our lives easier to also use _alpha0
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 02:39:46 -0700
Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm unaware of any suffix *currently* that has some long time usage that
> is used by a mere .06% of the tree. LZMA likely would apply, but
> that also was introduced rather recent so isn't exactly
> representative.
7z
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 12:24:10 -0400
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> those arent the same thing. -r# is a Gentoo-specific revision
> marking. _alpha/_rc/etc... are used to track upstream. if upstream
> uses _alpha0, then it makes our lives easier to also use _alpha0.
> -r0 has no benefi
Ioannis Aslanidis wrote:
If you are asking about mathematic stright definition:
negative integer: -inf,...,-1
positive integer: 1,...,inf
natural: 0,...,inf
The group of natural numbers includes the positive integers and zero.
That is the definition in most places in the world; however, in the
On Sunday 30 March 2008, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Sun, 30 Mar 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >>
> >> And IMHO the "emacs" USE flag should not be used here:
> >>
> >> $ ./configure -hs
> >> Configuration of Leafpad 0.8.12:
> >>
> >> Optional Features:
> >> [...]
> >> --enable-emacs i
> On Sun, 30 Mar 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> And IMHO the "emacs" USE flag should not be used here:
>>
>> $ ./configure -hs
>> Configuration of Leafpad 0.8.12:
>>
>> Optional Features:
>> [...]
>> --enable-emacs implement Emacs key theme (experimental)
>>
>> $ equery uses =leafp
On Sunday 30 March 2008, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Sat, 29 Mar 2008, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> >
> > On 19:37 Sat 29 Mar , Saleem Abdulrasool (compnerd) wrote:
> >> 1.1 app-editors/leafpad/leafpad-0.8.14.ebuild
> >>
> >> src_compile() {
> >>econf --enable-chooser --en
On Saturday 29 March 2008, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The reason I'm emailing -dev is to ensure there is consensus on
> > leaving off an explicit -r0 in the ebuild name- long term, it seems
> > folks always followed the rule but it needs to be codified due
On Sunday 30 March 2008, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 16:02 Sat 29 Mar , Mike Frysinger (vapier) wrote:
> > 1.1 sys-devel/gdb/gdb-6.8.ebuild
> >
> > file :
> > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-devel/gdb/gdb-6.8.ebu
> >ild?rev=1.1&view=markup plain:
> > http://
On Sunday 30 March 2008, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 17:26 Sat 29 Mar , Mike Frysinger (vapier) wrote:
> > 1.1 sys-apps/iproute2/iproute2-2.6.24.20080108.ebuild
> >
> > file :
> > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-apps/iproute2/iproute
> >2-2.6.24.20080108.ebu
If you are asking about mathematic stright definition:
negative integer: -inf,...,-1
positive integer: 1,...,inf
natural: 0,...,inf
The group of natural numbers includes the positive integers and zero.
That is the definition in most places in the world; however, in the
United States and a few mor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Duncan wrote:
| Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
| [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on
| Sun, 30 Mar 2008 02:39:46 -0700:
|
|> No need to ban 1.00; it's already banned by PMS- quoting from names.tex:
|>
|> A version starts with the number p
Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on
Sun, 30 Mar 2008 02:39:46 -0700:
> No need to ban 1.00; it's already banned by PMS- quoting from names.tex:
>
> A version starts with the number part, which is in the form
> \t{[0-9]+($\backslash$.[0-9]+)*} (a positi
"Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on
Sat, 29 Mar 2008 23:37:13 -0700:
> The new -r5 of Grub provides a LOT of functionality and workings over
> the previous -r3 and -r4, however I would like more testers than I
> previously had.
Is there a grub-sta
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 05:40:44AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 21:16:51 -0700
> Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Contrasting tabs vs spaces is a whole other matter. One of the
> > things you attempted to do in splitting PMS was to force certain
> > technical twe
31 matches
Mail list logo
