Re: [gentoo-dev] Chromium in Gentoo project looking for developers

2010-08-17 Thread Luca Barbato
On 08/16/2010 07:58 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > If you are a Gentoo developer and are using www-client/chromium, please > consider joining the "Chromium in Gentoo" project: > > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/chromium/index.xml > > You don't need to modify or bump packages to join. In

Re: [gentoo-dev] FYI: Rules for distro-friendly packages

2010-08-17 Thread Jacob Godserv
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 19:04:03 +0200 Enrico Weigelt wrote: > Meanwhile I've reworked my Briegel buildsystem [1] to support > direct git checkouts (including a repo cache). Next step will be > a mechanism to check tag signatures. You have a footnote, but no link, and I'm curious. :) -- Jacob

[gentoo-dev] Re: OSS-QM again ...

2010-08-17 Thread Duncan
Mike Frysinger posted on Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:55:25 -0400 as excerpted: > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Enrico Weigelt wrote: >> That's yet another reason why I'd like package maintainers to push >> their changes into the oss-qm repo. That would be a great help for >> others having to deal with

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-user] FYI: Rules for distro-friendly packages

2010-08-17 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Alan McKinnon schrieb: > My biggest beef by far when packaging apps is automagic dependencies. > > e17 is full of them - if package A is present, the app will configure itself > to use it. Usually you cannot switch this kind of thing off even if you have > valid reasons to do so. That's one

Re: [gentoo-dev] OSS-QM again ...

2010-08-17 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Enrico Weigelt wrote: > That's yet another reason why I'd like package maintainers to > push their changes into the oss-qm repo. That would be a great > help for others having to deal with the same package. nothing is stopping individual maintainers from contribut

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Cleanup of the "Get Gentoo" page

2010-08-17 Thread David Abbott
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/17/2010 10:07 AM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > On 8/16/10 5:29 PM, David Abbott wrote: >> I can but just want to make sure this is what everyone wants; >> http://dev.gentoo.org/~dabbott/pr/where.xml >> I got that from http://dev.gentoo.org/~phajd

Re: [gentoo-dev] FYI: Rules for distro-friendly packages

2010-08-17 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Brian Harring schrieb: > > hmm, I'm exclusively using bzip2 and never had these problems > > yet. maybe it depends on the compressor type. > > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0025.html#the-problem-in-detail > > Note also that bzip2 had another change in output after that > release- m

Re: [gentoo-dev] OSS-QM again ...

2010-08-17 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 18:44:58 +0200 Jeroen Roovers wrote: > [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=326991 And [2]. jer [2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=322157

Re: [gentoo-dev] OSS-QM again ...

2010-08-17 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:58:49 +0200 Enrico Weigelt wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > perhaps you remember the discussion of oss-qm + git-repos several > weeks ago. I remember a lacklustre discussion on this mailing list (sping was with you, a couple of others were at best discussing the shortcomings

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in www-apps/drupal: drupal-5.23.ebuild ChangeLog drupal-6.19.ebuild drupal-6.16.ebuild drupal-6.17.ebuild drupal-5.22.ebuild

2010-08-17 Thread Alex Legler
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 16:11:42 +0400, Peter Volkov wrote: > В Втр, 17/08/2010 в 11:27 +0200, Alex Legler пишет: > > but as for removing the old versions, that's something we usually > > ask people to do after bumping packages with security issues to > > minimize the risk of people installing possib

[gentoo-dev] OSS-QM again ...

2010-08-17 Thread Enrico Weigelt
Hi folks, perhaps you remember the discussion of oss-qm + git-repos several weeks ago. Just to add another point: I'm going to add an automatic notification system on new changes, so upstreams and other parties can notified automatically, w/o additional manual intervention. That's yet another

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Cleanup of the "Get Gentoo" page

2010-08-17 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 8/16/10 5:29 PM, David Abbott wrote: > I can but just want to make sure this is what everyone wants; > http://dev.gentoo.org/~dabbott/pr/where.xml > I got that from http://dev.gentoo.org/~phajdan.jr/where.xml > Looks fine to me I am ready to commit, just say so and its done. Looks good to me. T

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in www-apps/drupal: drupal-5.23.ebuild ChangeLog drupal-6.19.ebuild drupal-6.16.ebuild drupal-6.17.ebuild drupal-5.22.ebuild

2010-08-17 Thread Peter Volkov
В Втр, 17/08/2010 в 11:27 +0200, Alex Legler пишет: > but as for removing the old versions, that's something we usually ask > people to do after bumping packages with security issues to minimize > the risk of people installing possibly vulnerable versions. I agree with removal but not immediately.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in www-apps/drupal: drupal-5.23.ebuild ChangeLog drupal-6.19.ebuild drupal-6.16.ebuild drupal-6.17.ebuild drupal-5.22.ebuild

2010-08-17 Thread Alexey Shvetsov
Ok =) Next time i'll add bug numbers =) Actualy i simply forgot about them. 2010/8/17 Alex Legler : > On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 10:46:10 +0400, Peter Volkov wrote: > >> В Пнд, 16/08/2010 в 18:04 +, Alexey Shvetsov (alexxy) пишет: >> > alexxy      10/08/16 18:04:52 >> > >> >   Modified:            

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in www-apps/drupal: drupal-5.23.ebuild ChangeLog drupal-6.19.ebuild drupal-6.16.ebuild drupal-6.17.ebuild drupal-5.22.ebuild

2010-08-17 Thread Alex Legler
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 10:46:10 +0400, Peter Volkov wrote: > В Пнд, 16/08/2010 в 18:04 +, Alexey Shvetsov (alexxy) пишет: > > alexxy 10/08/16 18:04:52 > > > > Modified: ChangeLog > > Added:drupal-5.23.ebuild drupal-6.19.ebuild > > Removed: dru

[gentoo-dev] last rites: games-emulation/xmame

2010-08-17 Thread Michael Sterrett
# Michael Sterrett (17 Aug 2010) # Mask for removal 20100916 # Development has moved to games-emulation/sdlmame; # use that package instead. games-emulation/xmame