On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 22:57:46 -0500
Nathan Zachary wrote:
> I don't think that the documentation changes should be a determining
> factor in switching to OpenRC. If we are going to endorse using OpenRC,
> the more relevant issues are the ones regarding its future development.
> The documentati
On 24/08/10 22:21, Joshua Saddler wrote:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 19:18:56 +0200
Christian Faulhammer wrote:
Hi,
Joshua Saddler:
The big issue with the docs is that IF OpenRC/baselayout-2 are marked
stable, it will require massive changes to hundreds of our other doc
files.
Is there a list of
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 19:18:56 +0200
Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Joshua Saddler :
> > The big issue with the docs is that IF OpenRC/baselayout-2 are marked
> > stable, it will require massive changes to hundreds of our other doc
> > files.
>
> Is there a list of the needed changes?
Re
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 17:30:32 -0400
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 24, 2010 14:40:56 Michał Górny wrote:
> > 3e30e1f Rename to scons-utils.eclass.
>
> funny, i thought "scons.eclass" was appropriate. but whatever.
Maciej complained about not exporting all ever possible buildsystem-
On Tuesday, August 24, 2010 14:40:56 Michał Górny wrote:
> 3e30e1f Rename to scons-utils.eclass.
funny, i thought "scons.eclass" was appropriate. but whatever.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Monday, August 23, 2010 11:42:49 Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 17:06:22 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > local varname=${2:-${flag}}
> >
> > should be stripping possible leading ! so that people can do
> > `use_scons !foo moo` just like they can today with `use_with $foo moo`
>
# Dominik Kapusta (24 Aug 2010)
# Replaced by dev-python/shiboken
#
# Removal on 2010-09-23
dev-python/boostpythongenerator
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Mike Frysinger said:
> On Tuesday, August 24, 2010 08:57:45 Thilo Bangert wrote:
> > > , efficient, known-good solution
> > > that does what you'd expect it to do and replace it with a new
> > > thingy that doesn't provide all the features, is harder to debug
> > > etc. etc.? I just don't see any
r4, ChangeLog:
3e30e1f Rename to scons-utils.eclass.
6477004 Remove exported phase functions.
41784fc Implement a cache in scons_clean_makeopts().
9b3ce5d Clarify doc on SCONSOPTS.
ac9f7ed Call scons_clean_makeopts() inline instead of exporting
SCONSOPTS.
ae6afd9 Fix SCONSOPTS check in esc
On Tuesday 24 of August 2010 10:30:12 Michał Górny wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 19:36:50 +0200
>
> Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
> > If SCons is unpredictable, then don't provide *any* phases and only
> > functions and rename it to scons-utils to match its purpose.
>
> It is as predictable as the buil
Hi,
Joshua Saddler :
> The big issue with the docs is that IF OpenRC/baselayout-2 are marked
> stable, it will require massive changes to hundreds of our other doc
> files.
Is there a list of the needed changes?
V-Li
--
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/l
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 09:18:02AM +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> I'd leave out the HG_REV_NUM, it doesn't mean much anyway (since it is
> local to a repository, it can easily change).
Ok, dropped that and committed the rest.
--
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee & Infrastructur
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 10:30:20 -0400
Richard Freeman wrote:
> Looking at the tracker bug, I see all of three issues blocking openrc
> from going stable. One is documentation,
> It seems like we should just make the next bugday "OpenRC Cleanup Day"
> or something like that. Everybody can take 1
On Tuesday, August 24, 2010 08:57:45 Thilo Bangert wrote:
> > , efficient, known-good solution
> > that does what you'd expect it to do and replace it with a new thingy
> > that doesn't provide all the features, is harder to debug etc. etc.? I
> > just don't see any *advantage* from it apart from s
On 08/24/2010 08:57 AM, Thilo Bangert wrote:
given how long, so far, it has taken openrc to reach stable, it is no
wonder people start lobbying for systemd today. ;-)
Perhaps, but if we want to move in that direction perhaps we should
consider at least getting openrc stable first. That doesn'
> Or you just let a shell handle it. Does most of the things
> automatically, has a pretty low memory and startup overhead, and it
> tends to be quite human-readable.
>
> ... why would I want to remove a
> stable
the biggest complaint about openrc is that its not in stable - go figure.
> , eff
# Diego E. Pettenò (24 Aug 2010)
# on behalf of QA team
#
# Split samba ebuilds that are no longer relevant as the
# un-split 3.5 is stable already. Quick removal.
#
# Removal on 2010-09-08
net-fs/samba-libs
net-fs/samba-client
net-fs/samba-server
On 08/23/10 19:26, Olivier Crête wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 17:05 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
>> Le lundi 05 juillet 2010 à 08:57 +, Duncan a écrit :
>> [lots of stuff about bashisms and posix]
>>> So let's stabilize OpenRC and be done with it, and /then/ we can debate
>>> where we
On 08/23/2010 11:07 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday, August 23, 2010 16:21:44 Luca Barbato wrote:
>> I'd put openrc on freedesktop btw.
>
> we've sort of already settled into the places ... jumping to another place
> doesnt gain us much. current infrastructure also already enables all the
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 19:36:50 +0200
Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
> If SCons is unpredictable, then don't provide *any* phases and only
> functions and rename it to scons-utils to match its purpose.
It is as predictable as the buildsystem meeting the default phase
functions requirements -- we can confi
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 19:27:22 -0400
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> then keep it simple and separate:
> escons() {
> debug-print-function ${FUNCNAME} "$...@}"
>
> set -- scons $(scons_clean_makeopts) ${SCONSOPTS}
> ${EXTRA_ESCONS} "$...@}" echo "$...@}" >&2
> "$...@}"
> }
>
> now you d
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 23:23, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> Index: mercurial.eclass
> ===
> RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/eclass/mercurial.eclass,v
> retrieving revision 1.12
> diff -p -w -b -B -u -r1.12 mercurial.eclass
> --- mercur
22 matches
Mail list logo
