[gentoo-dev] Xen completely busted in the stable tree

2011-08-27 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
Hey guys, I think app-emulation/xen-tools are completely broken in stable tree, especially see bugs like and I noticed some activity and work being done on those packages, but only in ~arch. If someon

Re: [gentoo-dev] License for Google Chrome

2011-08-27 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Roy Bamford wrote: > On 2011.08.26 23:06, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> I have been maintaining an ebuild for Google Chrome in an overlay. It >> basically extracts a deb file to /opt. This serves as an easy >> alternative for people who do not have the patience to compile

[gentoo-dev] Re: [sys-boot/grub] Grub2 series prepared for testing

2011-08-27 Thread Duncan
Tomáš Chvátal posted on Sun, 28 Aug 2011 13:28:26 +0200 as excerpted: > I updated the grub2 ebuilds in main tree and took maintainership of > grub2. Thanks. I've been wondering about trying grub2, but have some questions. What is needed to compile it? Specifically, my main machine is ~amd64 no

Re: [gentoo-dev] License for Google Chrome

2011-08-27 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 8/26/11 9:32 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > To clarify: Chrome is a pre-built, officially branded version of the > open-source "Chromium" project. It also includes a few proprietary > components, like a PDF reader plugin from Adobe. To be precise, the PDF reader in Chrome is not Adobe's, but Google'

[gentoo-dev] Re: License for Google Chrome

2011-08-27 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
Il giorno sab, 27/08/2011 alle 08.23 -0400, Rich Freeman ha scritto: > Gentoo does not > need to accept a license to allow users to fetch a file directly, so > the EULA/license in itself doesn't necessarily force us to use > RESTRICT=fetch. Let me try to use this point to remind that "unclear pat

Re: [gentoo-dev] License for Google Chrome

2011-08-27 Thread Roy Bamford
On 2011.08.26 23:06, Mike Gilbert wrote: > I have been maintaining an ebuild for Google Chrome in an overlay. It > basically extracts a deb file to /opt. This serves as an easy > alternative for people who do not have the patience to compile > Chromium. > > Now that I have developer access, I woul

Re: [gentoo-dev] License for Google Chrome

2011-08-27 Thread Rich Freeman
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > Perhaps I used the wrong term here. I mean that 2.2 (B) allows the > user to download and install the software without having to explicitly > click the "Agree" button on the software download page. I did not review the Chrome license, but spe