Re: [gentoo-dev] Dropping localepurge

2012-01-28 Thread Philip Webb
120128 Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Saturday 28 January 2012 08:29:44 Pacho Ramos wrote: >> As talked with him, he won't be able to contribute a lot >> during the following months and then would be nice >> to find co-maintainers for his packages if possible: >> app-admin/localepurge > can probably ju

Re: [gentoo-dev] Keeping older versions around

2012-01-28 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 10:33 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: > When you bump > to a new ~arch version, please consider keeping at least one previous ~arch > version around, so if people run into major issues they can at lease try the > previously installed version to determine if it's your package at fault.

[gentoo-dev] Keeping older versions around

2012-01-28 Thread Ryan Hill
I've run into this three times today, so I'm a little grumpy. When you bump to a new ~arch version, please consider keeping at least one previous ~arch version around, so if people run into major issues they can at lease try the previously installed version to determine if it's your package at fau

[gentoo-dev] [FYI] php-lib-r1.eclass going to die

2012-01-28 Thread Matti Bickel
Hi folks, I thought I'd throw this out, so nobody is suprised when I start to put qawarns in the eclass: I don't think php-lib-r1.eclass has any value now that we have EAPI4. The only thing it basically does is a) setting RDEPEND="dev-lang/php" and b) provide a php_lib_r1_src_install that accepts

[gentoo-dev] Last Rites: dev-db/pgaccess

2012-01-28 Thread Mr. Aaron W. Swenson
# Aaron W. Swenson (28 Jan 2012) # Masked for last rites. Package is no longer maintained upstream and # is not fully compatible with recent versions of PostgreSQL. Removal # in 60 days. # Alternatives: dev-db/pgadmin3 or dev-db/phppgadmin dev-db/pgaccess -- Mr. Aaron W. Swenson Gentoo Linux Deve

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages maintained by bass need a co-maintainer

2012-01-28 Thread Pacho Ramos
El sáb, 28-01-2012 a las 15:57 -0500, Mike Frysinger escribió: > On Saturday 28 January 2012 08:29:44 Pacho Ramos wrote: > > As talked with him, he won't be able to contribute a lot during the > > following months and then would be nice to find co-maintainers for > > his packages if possible: > > a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages maintained by bass need a co-maintainer

2012-01-28 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 28 January 2012 08:29:44 Pacho Ramos wrote: > As talked with him, he won't be able to contribute a lot during the > following months and then would be nice to find co-maintainers for > his packages if possible: > app-admin/localepurge can probably just be dropped. packages should resp

Re: [gentoo-dev] About obsolete/useless devaway messages

2012-01-28 Thread Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 01/28/2012 03:57 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Pacho Ramos > wrote: >> Was reviewing http://dev.gentoo.org/devaway/ and I have seen >> there are a lot of obsolete messages. Could you take a look and >> verify don't h

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages maintained by jokey need a co-maintainer

2012-01-28 Thread Sergei Trofimovich
I'll look after app-misc/bb net-im/openfire -- Sergei signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] About obsolete/useless devaway messages

2012-01-28 Thread Pacho Ramos
El sáb, 28-01-2012 a las 10:57 -0500, Rich Freeman escribió: > On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Was reviewing http://dev.gentoo.org/devaway/ and I have seen there are a > > lot of obsolete messages. Could you take a look and verify don't have an > > old .away file in your h

Re: [gentoo-dev] About obsolete/useless devaway messages

2012-01-28 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > Was reviewing http://dev.gentoo.org/devaway/ and I have seen there are a > lot of obsolete messages. Could you take a look and verify don't have an > old .away file in your homes ;) ? Might not hurt to generally consider the usefulness of .aw

[gentoo-dev] About obsolete/useless devaway messages

2012-01-28 Thread Pacho Ramos
Was reviewing http://dev.gentoo.org/devaway/ and I have seen there are a lot of obsolete messages. Could you take a look and verify don't have an old .away file in your homes ;) ? Thanks a lot signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[gentoo-dev] Packages maintained by bass need a co-maintainer

2012-01-28 Thread Pacho Ramos
As talked with him, he won't be able to contribute a lot during the following months and then would be nice to find co-maintainers for his packages if possible: app-admin/localepurge app-admin/recursos app-doc/ebookmerge app-misc/gnomecatalog dev-embedded/gnap-dev dev-embedded/gnap net-analyzer/mi

[gentoo-dev] Packages maintained by jokey need a co-maintainer

2012-01-28 Thread Pacho Ramos
As talked with him, he won't be able to contribute a lot during the following months and then (Jokey: please remember to update your devaway message!!) would be nice to find co-maintainers for his packages: app-misc/bb app-misc/devtodo app-misc/ytree app-portage/maintainer-helper app-portage/portat

Re: [gentoo-dev] Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor?

2012-01-28 Thread Anthony G. Basile
On 01/27/2012 07:12 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Friday 27 January 2012 16:05:13 Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 21:13, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: Again - only if we don't get a consensus here. Wait... Is anybody here *actually opposed* to not enabling PIE on *SUID binaries*?

Re: [gentoo-dev] useless set*id binaries

2012-01-28 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 01/28/2012 10:32 AM, Michał Górny wrote: On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 03:07:45 +0200 Samuli Suominen wrote: On 01/28/2012 02:41 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Friday 27 January 2012 19:18:07 Samuli Suominen wrote: On 01/28/2012 02:14 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: along these lines, why is cdrtools set*

[gentoo-dev] Some news about status of ConsoleKit and Display Managers in Portage

2012-01-28 Thread Samuli Suominen
pambase-20101024-r2 will restore the same behavior as pambase-20101024 had; it will restore the 'nox11' argument to the pam_ck_connector.so line in /etc/pam.d/system-login. this pam_ck_connector.so module is now used only for console logins because all of the display managers we ship, have nat

Re: [gentoo-dev] useless set*id binaries

2012-01-28 Thread Michał Górny
On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 03:07:45 +0200 Samuli Suominen wrote: > On 01/28/2012 02:41 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Friday 27 January 2012 19:18:07 Samuli Suominen wrote: > >> On 01/28/2012 02:14 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > >>> along these lines, why is cdrtools set*id ? if we have a "cdrom" > >>>

Re: [gentoo-dev] useless set*id binaries

2012-01-28 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Sat, 28 Jan 2012, Samuli Suominen wrote: >> This is definitely not an improvement and should be reverted. The >> suid root is also needed to elevate cdrecord's scheduling priority. > Missed that piece of code and reverted then. Any chance you could be > more specific? cdrecord calls mlo

[gentoo-dev] Lastrite: x11-misc/enter

2012-01-28 Thread Samuli Suominen
# Samuli Suominen (28 Jan 2012) # Missing native ConsoleKit support and upstream has # stopped development. # Use lightdm, gdm, kdm, lxdm, slim (only latest), or xdm (only latest). # Removal in 30 days. x11-misc/enter

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-python/pisa

2012-01-28 Thread Krzysztof Pawlik
# Krzysztof Pawlik (27 Jan 2012) # Deprecated, please migrate your code to dev-python/xhtml2pdf. # Removal by end of February. dev-python/pisa -- Krzysztof Pawlikkey id: 0xF6A80E46 desktop-misc, java, vim, kernel, python, apache... signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature