On Sat, 2 Feb 2013 23:33:26 +
"Aaron W. Swenson" wrote:
> After years of "if use test ; then ..." just working when
> FEATURES="test" is declared, it isn't working with EAPI5.
I would say that's a bug fix. If you're checking if a USE flag is set then it
had better be in IUSE.
--
gcc-port
On Sat, 02 Feb 2013 12:06:39 +0100
hasufell wrote:
> From a little discussion in this bug
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454600#c11
> it seems that it's not entirely sure what bash version can be assumed.
We have eclasses that require Bash 4 (eg. multiprocessing.eclass uses BASHPID).
On Fri, 1 Feb 2013 06:15:32 -0500
Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> >>
> >> If we added a "Keyword/Stable Request" component to the "Gentoo Linux"
> >> product we could also have it dependent on that, so only bugs in that
> >> component would display the f
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Vaeth wrote:
> Sorry, but I feel that I must explain once more:
>
>
When I came to Gentoo many years ago, this was a very rare problem,
but the removal of packages has tremendously increased, and it is
not only me who is observing this problem - there
On Sun, 2013-02-03 at 06:07 +0100, Vaeth wrote:
> So this 30 day delay will enable these people to get involved,
> especially for all the packages which were removed in the last years?
> Now it is apparent that an archive for dropped packages (in the
> form of keeping masked packages or some other
Sorry, but I feel that I must explain once more:
When I came to Gentoo many years ago, this was a very rare problem,
but the removal of packages has tremendously increased, and it is
not only me who is observing this problem - there were already some
threads in the forums, and people planning to
On 2013-02-02, at 6:50 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Feb 2013 23:33:26 +
> "Aaron W. Swenson" wrote:.
>
> First of all, you should note that you will still need to add IUSE=test
> to pre-EAPI 5 ebuilds.
>
> Secondly, what about all the ebuilds which declare IUSE=test in EAPI 5?
> S
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 12:50:02AM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Feb 2013 23:33:26 +
> "Aaron W. Swenson" wrote:
>
> > After years of "if use test ; then ..." just working when
> > FEATURES="test" is declared, it isn't working with EAPI5.
>
> You shouldn't admit that for years you d
On 2013-02-02, at 7:20 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> After talking with him we agreed to have the following packages up for
> grabs:
> sci-geosciences/googleearth
> media-gfx/picasa (will probably be treecleaned as upstream dropped linux
> suppport time ago)
>
I just tried installing picasa two da
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013, at 02:24 PM, Dustin C. Hatch wrote:
> On 2/2/2013 13:19, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > El mar, 29-01-2013 a las 15:55 +0400, Sergey Popov escribió:
> >> 28.01.2013 23:26, Pacho Ramos пишет:
> >>> Then, looks like no alternative is in good shape on Gentoo. What is
> >>> Sabayon using
On Sun, 3 Feb 2013 00:50:02 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> What will be the impact on metadata? It seems that the PMS allows
> dependencies on IUSE_EFFECTIVE, so we can basically have dependencies
> with flags which are valid only on some of the profiles...
I don't get it. Be more specific as to how
On Sat, 2 Feb 2013 23:33:26 +
"Aaron W. Swenson" wrote:
> After years of "if use test ; then ..." just working when
> FEATURES="test" is declared, it isn't working with EAPI5.
You shouldn't admit that for years you didn't knew that this was
incorrect and you should have been using IUSE=test.
After years of "if use test ; then ..." just working when
FEATURES="test" is declared, it isn't working with EAPI5. I think we
could save some bytes and headaches if we just add "test" to
IUSE_IMPLICIT.
Portage's emerge's "--newuse" option won't be affected by this. From
`man emerge`:
> NOTE: This
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 10:14 AM, James Cloos wrote:
>> "AW" == Alec Warner writes:
>
> AW> If folks do not want to maintain it anymore, then it will be removed.
>
> That is about as harmful an attitude as possible.
>
> If you don't personally care about a package just leave it alone!
The poi
Am Freitag, 1. Februar 2013, 14:53:19 schrieb Tomáš Chvátal:
> just to be sure here "Removals are completely up to the maintainer to
> decide", with expection of QA removal where the package must be
> already broken to get punted.
>
> If you as developers and users find some package useful you can
On 2/2/2013 13:19, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El mar, 29-01-2013 a las 15:55 +0400, Sergey Popov escribió:
28.01.2013 23:26, Pacho Ramos пишет:
Then, looks like no alternative is in good shape on Gentoo. What is
Sabayon using? They look to have plymouth ebuilds in their overlay (but
not in "for-gentoo"
Am Samstag, 2. Februar 2013, 19:11:30 schrieb James Cloos:
> > "MS" == Michael Sterrett writes:
> MS> # Old, dead upstream, slightly broken and uses imake.
>
> Nothing wrong with old. The web page is still there. It works
> reasonably well and THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH IMAKE.
>
> MS> # M
El mar, 29-01-2013 a las 15:55 +0400, Sergey Popov escribió:
> 28.01.2013 23:26, Pacho Ramos пишет:
> > Then, looks like no alternative is in good shape on Gentoo. What is
> > Sabayon using? They look to have plymouth ebuilds in their overlay (but
> > not in "for-gentoo" one, then, it probably has
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/02/2013 01:49 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 02:05:50PM +0100, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
>> Dne So 2. února 2013 12:44:30, Vaeth napsal(a):
>>>
>>> When I came to Gentoo many years ago, this was a very rare problem,
>>> but the rem
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 02:05:50PM +0100, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> Dne So 2. února 2013 12:44:30, Vaeth napsal(a):
> >
> > When I came to Gentoo many years ago, this was a very rare problem,
> > but the removal of packages has tremendously increased, and it is
> > not only me who is observing this p
> "AW" == Alec Warner writes:
AW> If folks do not want to maintain it anymore, then it will be removed.
That is about as harmful an attitude as possible.
If you don't personally care about a package just leave it alone!
And if you want more maintainers, then drop the schoolkid nonsense to
> "MS" == Michael Sterrett writes:
MS> # Old, dead upstream, slightly broken and uses imake.
Nothing wrong with old. The web page is still there. It works
reasonably well and THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH IMAKE.
MS> # Masked for removal on 20130302
MS> games-arcade/xboing
One should just l
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 2:17 AM, Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote:
> Quoting Pacho Ramos (2013-01-17 20:21:30)
>> # Pacho Ramos
>> # Still uses depend.php (#449820), upstream dead for ages and
>> # newer versions don't work. Removal in a month.
>> www-apps/online-bookmarks
>
> Is there any goog alternativ
Dne So 2. února 2013 12:44:30, Vaeth napsal(a):
>
> When I came to Gentoo many years ago, this was a very rare problem,
> but the removal of packages has tremendously increased, and it is
> not only me who is observing this problem - there were already some
> threads in the forums, and people plan
After talking with them, it's really understaffed to properly handle all
packages they cover right now. Would be nice if anyone would be willing
to join (as a dev or proxy maintainer). The following packages are
especially needed of a maintainer to handle them:
dev-scheme/tinyscheme
dev-scheme/guil
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 6:44 AM, Vaeth wrote:
> I just ask that Gentoo should not *hinder* the user in installing/
> maintaining a package later by removing the tarballs (and possibly
> patches) which once were available.
So, I can see the validity of this argument insofar as it applies to
Gentoo-
After talking with him we agreed to have the following packages up for
grabs:
sci-geosciences/googleearth
media-gfx/picasa (will probably be treecleaned as upstream dropped linux
suppport time ago)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
After talking with s4t4n the following packages are up for grabs due
lack of time for maintaining them, feel free to catch them if you want:
app-emulation/vov
app-text/rtf2html
dev-libs/libical
dev-libs/libwbxml
dev-util/jif
media-gfx/qingy-themes
net-misc/directvnc
net-wireless/wifi-radar
www-ser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/02/2013 12:13 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Feb 2013 12:06:39 +0100 hasufell
> wrote:
>> From a little discussion in this bug
>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454600#c11 it seems that
>> it's not entirely sure what bash vers
The ebuild is still available by CVS (or maybe git in future),
but if there were already a lot of gentoo patches, the tarball with
these patches is lost forever. If even upstream is dead, not even
the main tarball will be available anymore.
Oh but it can mostly these archaic packages do not have
Hello
Reviewing last commits of lack (the only rox team member), looks like he
hasn't committed anything rox related for some time. rox herd has some
bugs assigned to them that looks unattended (even some easy to fix
bugs). I have contacted the team but got no reply at all.
Is anybody willing to
On Sat, 02 Feb 2013 12:06:39 +0100
hasufell wrote:
> From a little discussion in this bug
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454600#c11
> it seems that it's not entirely sure what bash version can be assumed.
>
> PMS says, that I have to assume 3.2 or later
> https://dev.gentoo.org/~ulm/pm
On 02/02/2013 12:06 PM, hasufell wrote:
> portage itself depends on >=app-shells/bash-4.2_p37
>
strike that
|| ( >=app-shells/bash-4.2_p37[readline] ( =app-shells/bash-3.2_p17 ) )
!
>From a little discussion in this bug
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454600#c11
it seems that it's not entirely sure what bash version can be assumed.
PMS says, that I have to assume 3.2 or later
https://dev.gentoo.org/~ulm/pms/head/pms.html#x1-620006
But there is no stable bash version
El vie, 01-02-2013 a las 21:34 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió:
> El vie, 01-02-2013 a las 17:55 +0800, Ben de Groot escribió:
> > On 1 February 2013 02:59, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > > El dom, 27-01-2013 a las 18:47 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió:
> > >> El dom, 27-01-2013 a las 15:00 +0100, Pacho Ramos esc
Quoting Pacho Ramos (2013-01-17 20:21:30)
> # Pacho Ramos
> # Still uses depend.php (#449820), upstream dead for ages and
> # newer versions don't work. Removal in a month.
> www-apps/online-bookmarks
Is there any goog alternative?
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
signature.asc
Description: signature
36 matches
Mail list logo
