Dnia 2014-02-24, o godz. 22:14:04
Peter Stuge napisał(a):
> > > I would prefer if I needed to allow such mode upgrades explicitly.
> >
> > That sounds like a lot ebuilds failing, requesting you to explicitly
> > change the mode.
>
> I think that's OK. If I've set a mode then I prefer failur
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Lars Wendler wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 19:46:23 +0100 Peter Stuge wrote:
>
>>Lars Wendler wrote:
>>> >> - try to prevent most naming pollution of pure udev with systemd
>>> >> crap.
>>> >
>>> >childish. me don't like pink ponies. pink too much. pony okay.
>>>
>>
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 19:46:23 +0100 Peter Stuge wrote:
>Lars Wendler wrote:
>> >> - try to prevent most naming pollution of pure udev with systemd
>> >> crap.
>> >
>> >childish. me don't like pink ponies. pink too much. pony okay.
>>
>> Riiight... as udev has anything else to do with systemd other
Title: >=sys-fs/udev-210 upgrade
Author: Samuli Suominen
Content-Type: text/plain
Posted: 2014-02-25
Revision: 1
News-Item-Format: 1.0
Display-If-Installed: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Udev/upgrade#udev_208_to_210
[2]
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/PredictableNetworkInterfaceN
# Michael Palimaka (26 Feb 2014)
# Doesn't build with recent graphviz. Dead upstream.
# Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug #491760.
media-gfx/kgraphviewer
You are welcome!
While testing I found strange race-condition bug in portage, I've filed it
here: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502428
2014-02-26 0:28 GMT+06:00 Michael Palimaka :
> On 02/22/2014 08:50 PM, Александр Берсенев wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've updated the autodep and testi
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 17:28:41 +0200
Samuli Suominen wrote:
>
> On 20/02/14 18:27, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 11:26:18 +0200
> > Samuli Suominen wrote:
> >
> >> On 20/02/14 10:47, Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 10:40 +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 2
Lars Wendler wrote:
> >> - try to prevent most naming pollution of pure udev with systemd
> >> crap.
> >
> >childish. me don't like pink ponies. pink too much. pony okay.
>
> Riiight... as udev has anything else to do with systemd other than
> being uselessly integrated into systemd whereas it can
On 02/22/2014 08:50 PM, Александр Берсенев wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've updated the autodep and testing it now.
Thanks for taking the time to do this!
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:32 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> I haven't looked into the details as to why a config file is stored in
> /lib/systemd, but I imagine that they're trying to store settings in
> one place and have them applied to multiple executables (though
> obviously by overriding the rule
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Thomas D. wrote:
> Rich Freeman wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Thomas D. wrote:
>>> Also, I cannot belief that I cannot overwrite
>>> "/lib/udev/rules.d/80-net-setup-link.rules" via "/etc/udev/rules.d"...
>>
>> I don't see why not - from the news item:
On 20/02/14 18:27, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 11:26:18 +0200
> Samuli Suominen wrote:
>
>> On 20/02/14 10:47, Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 10:40 +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 20/02/14 09:44, Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 07:55 +
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 5:12 AM, Joshua Kinard wrote:
> On 02/24/2014 12:17 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>>> On 24/02/14 10:55 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Thomas D.
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> not eve
> On Tue, 25 Feb 2014, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> 2014/2014-01-31-catalyst-head-changes.en.txt is missing it's gpg armour:
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/GLEP:42#News_Item_Files
Maybe the git update hook could check if the armour is present?
Ulrich
pgpNmdtbMHoRF.pgp
Description: PGP signatur
2014/2014-01-31-catalyst-head-changes.en.txt is missing it's gpg armour:
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/GLEP:42#News_Item_Files
On 25/02/14 14:18, Joshua Kinard wrote:
> On 02/25/2014 6:39 AM, Thomas D. wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> line 16 ("renamed the file to
>> /lib/udev/rules.d/80-net-setup-link.rules") and line 18 ("you can
>> override in /etc/systemd/network/") doesn't end with punctuation.
>>
>>
>> Did I get this right? I am
Hi,
Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Thomas D. wrote:
>> Also, I cannot belief that I cannot overwrite
>> "/lib/udev/rules.d/80-net-setup-link.rules" via "/etc/udev/rules.d"...
>
> I don't see why not - from the news item:
> So, to clarify, you can override the new .rules f
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Thomas D. wrote:
> Also, I cannot belief that I cannot overwrite
> "/lib/udev/rules.d/80-net-setup-link.rules" via "/etc/udev/rules.d"...
I don't see why not - from the news item:
So, to clarify, you can override the new .rules file or the .link file in /etc
but u
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Michał Górny:
> Dnia 2014-02-24, o godz. 22:40:34 hasufell
> napisał(a):
>
>>> Mode upgrades and downgrades
>>>
>>> Mode is not associated persistently with a repository.
>>> Therefore, using a repository in a differen
On 02/25/2014 6:39 AM, Thomas D. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> line 16 ("renamed the file to
> /lib/udev/rules.d/80-net-setup-link.rules") and line 18 ("you can
> override in /etc/systemd/network/") doesn't end with punctuation.
>
>
> Did I get this right? I am using udev to give my interfaces custom names
>
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Tom Wijsman wrote:
> > I'd say that if around 7 people vote on the matter that that is
> > based on a necessary amount of understanding.
>
> That is just incredibly naïve.
>
> [...]
>
> In history lessons you may have learned about majorities
Hi,
line 16 ("renamed the file to
/lib/udev/rules.d/80-net-setup-link.rules") and line 18 ("you can
override in /etc/systemd/network/") doesn't end with punctuation.
Did I get this right? I am using udev to give my interfaces custom names
and I am not a systemd user but to keep my setup working
Samuli Suominen posted on Tue, 25 Feb 2014 10:43:15 +0200 as excerpted:
> Here is a bit better worded news item for the upgrade.
Looks much better, thanks. =:^)
But...
> The options CONFIG_DMIID
Umm... "Don't Mind if I do"? That's what google says about DMIID, and
there's nothing about it o
On 25/02/14 13:03, Joshua Kinard wrote:
> On 02/25/2014 5:27 AM, Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
>> On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 10:43 +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>>> Here is a bit better worded news item for the upgrade. I think I've
>>> taken into account any concerns, but please check
>>> the grammar part
On 02/24/2014 12:48 PM, Lars Wendler (Polynomial-C) wrote:
> This is another good reason why udev should have _never_ been integrated
> into systemd!
>
> In case someone still wants to retain his original systemd INSTALL_MASK,
> just use udev ebuilds from poly-c overlay. These ebuilds
>
There's
On 02/25/2014 5:27 AM, Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 10:43 +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> Here is a bit better worded news item for the upgrade. I think I've
>> taken into account any concerns, but please check
>> the grammar part. Thanks!
>>
>> - Samuli
>
> CONFIG_DMIID isn'
On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 10:43 +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Here is a bit better worded news item for the upgrade. I think I've
> taken into account any concerns, but please check
> the grammar part. Thanks!
>
> - Samuli
CONFIG_DMIID isn't available for ARM. Can we make that warning go away
if on
On 02/24/2014 12:17 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>> On 24/02/14 10:55 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Thomas D.
>>> wrote:
Hi,
not everyone is using systemd. On my systems for example, I don't
Here is a bit better worded news item for the upgrade. I think I've
taken into account any concerns, but please check
the grammar part. Thanks!
- Samuli
Title: Upgrade to >=sys-fs/udev-210
Author: Samuli Suominen
Content-Type: text/plain
Posted: 2014-02-25
Revision: 1
News-Item-Format: 1.0
Displa
29 matches
Mail list logo
