On Sat, 2014-03-08 at 21:23 -0500, Joshua Kinard wrote:
> So I want to try and play around with a particular network domination tool
> on my home network, Omphalos. However, its current configure script has a
> hard dependency on bluetooth.h, part of the net-wireless/bluez package.
>
> Currently,
So I want to try and play around with a particular network domination tool
on my home network, Omphalos. However, its current configure script has a
hard dependency on bluetooth.h, part of the net-wireless/bluez package.
Currently, net-wireless/bluez has a harddep on virtual/udev, which works
gr
Tom Wijsman posted on Sat, 08 Mar 2014 11:37:55 +0100 as excerpted:
>> 0 1 2 3 4
>> 012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234
>> Ruby MRI 1.8 removal; 1.9 recommended default
>>
>> (The latter is GLEP 42's max 44 chars exactly, and accurately
>> represents the
On Sat, 8 Mar 2014 16:09:04 +
Sven Vermeulen wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I'm going to add eid-viewer, which is software to view the contents
> of a Belgian eID card (such as the person's picture, address details
> or certificte information), to the Portage tree.
>
> I think the most proper category
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 03/08/2014 02:25 PM, Alex Xu wrote:
> On 08/03/14 05:37 AM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
>> On Sat, 8 Mar 2014 01:46:52 + (UTC) Duncan
>> <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
>>
>>> 0 1 2 3 4
>>> 012345678901234567890123456789
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 03/08/2014 02:56 PM, Alex Legler wrote:
> On 08.03.2014 14:52, Alex Legler wrote:
>>
>> Also, I doubt we're recommending 1.9 over 2.0 (or vice versa).
>>
>
> scratch that, seems like we are (even though big users like rails
> actively push use
Hi all
I'm going to add eid-viewer, which is software to view the contents of a
Belgian eID card (such as the person's picture, address details or
certificte information), to the Portage tree.
I think the most proper category is "app-misc", but considering this is
already a quite "full" category
On 08.03.2014 14:52, Alex Legler wrote:
>
> Also, I doubt we're recommending 1.9 over 2.0 (or vice versa).
>
scratch that, seems like we are (even though big users like rails
actively push users to 2.0; but that's probably not important here)
--
Alex Legler
Gentoo Security/Ruby/Infrastructure
On 08.03.2014 14:25, Alex Xu wrote:
> On 08/03/14 05:37 AM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
>> On Sat, 8 Mar 2014 01:46:52 + (UTC)
>> Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
>>
>>> 0 1 2 3 4
>>> 012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234
>>> Ruby MRI 1.8 removal; 1.9 recommen
On 08/03/14 05:37 AM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Mar 2014 01:46:52 + (UTC)
> Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
>
>> 0 1 2 3 4
>> 012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234
>> Ruby MRI 1.8 removal; 1.9 recommended default
>>
>> (The latter is GLEP 42's
On Sat, 8 Mar 2014 01:46:52 + (UTC)
Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> 0 1 2 3 4
> 012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234
> Ruby MRI 1.8 removal; 1.9 recommended default
>
> (The latter is GLEP 42's max 44 chars exactly, and accurately
> represents t
11 matches
Mail list logo
