[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-db/mysql: mysql-5.1.73-r1.ebuild ChangeLog mysql-5.1.73.ebuild

2014-05-13 Thread Justin (jlec)
On 14/05/14 03:47, Brian Evans (grknight) wrote: Hi Brian, > EAPI="4" please always try to bump to latest EAPI when ever you add a new revision or version to the tree, > # Most of these are in the eclass > DEPEND="|| ( >=sys-devel/gcc-3.4.6 >=sys-devel/gcc-apple-4.0 ) > >=sys-dev

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-vcs/cvs: cvs-1.12.12-r6.ebuild cvs-1.12.12-r8.ebuild cvs-1.12.12-r10.ebuild cvs-1.11.23.ebuild ChangeLog cvs-1.12.12-r7.ebuild cvs-1.12.1

2014-05-13 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Wed, 14 May 2014 00:11:21 + "Robin H. Johnson" wrote: > Anyway, I'm ripping that out entirely to replace with RESTRICT=test. Great. jer

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: using .xz for doc/man/info compression

2014-05-13 Thread Kent Fredric
On 12 May 2014 21:35, Tom Wijsman wrote: > What about putting multiple doc / man / info files in a single .xz file > for each package? > How would one use them if they're installed as a single .xz file per package? Is there a trick that exists to allow this to even work for "man man" ? I'm gu

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: using .xz for doc/man/info compression

2014-05-13 Thread Andrew Savchenko
On Tue, 13 May 2014 08:18:25 -0400 Rich Freeman wrote: > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 7:01 AM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > > > If we are trying to consider all possible cases, some filesystems > > may benefit even from compression of very small files (e.g. from > > 140 to 100 bytes) due to packing of m

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-vcs/cvs: cvs-1.12.12-r6.ebuild cvs-1.12.12-r8.ebuild cvs-1.12.12-r10.ebuild cvs-1.11.23.ebuild ChangeLog cvs-1.12.12-r7.ebuild cvs-1.12.12-r9

2014-05-13 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 07:26:46PM +, Jeroen Roovers (jer) wrote: > jer 14/05/13 19:26:46 > > Modified: cvs-1.12.12-r6.ebuild cvs-1.12.12-r8.ebuild > cvs-1.12.12-r10.ebuild cvs-1.11.23.ebuild ChangeLog > cvs-1.12.12-r7.ebuil

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The gx86-multilib project needs your help! (+ roadmap reminder)

2014-05-13 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 13/05/14 03:19 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > El dom, 11-05-2014 a las 20:56 +0200, Michał Górny escribió: [...] >> 4. whenever possible, depend on the specific subslot that is >> known to provide SONAME equal to the required by your package, >> e.g. fo

[gentoo-dev] Re: The gx86-multilib project needs your help! (+ roadmap reminder)

2014-05-13 Thread Pacho Ramos
El dom, 11-05-2014 a las 20:56 +0200, Michał Górny escribió: [...] > 4. whenever possible, depend on the specific subslot that is known to > provide SONAME equal to the required by your package, e.g. for > libgcrypt.so.20 you depend on libgcrypt:0/20, [...] Why is this needed? Thanks for the expla

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: using .xz for doc/man/info compression

2014-05-13 Thread Duncan
Rich Freeman posted on Tue, 13 May 2014 08:18:25 -0400 as excerpted: > Btrfs also supports file inlining, so every byte saved on small files > does actually help (I believe the data structure that stores the inlined > data doesn't have a fixed record size). There's an option for it, altho I've no

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: enabling ipc-sandbox & network-sandbox by default

2014-05-13 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2014-05-13, o godz. 09:28:49 Andrew Savchenko napisał(a): > I tried network-sandbox — this is a disaster. It brokes distcc > completely since distcc client can't connect to remote servers (and > even to a local one if any). Calling something a disaster just because it breaks one thing is un

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: using .xz for doc/man/info compression

2014-05-13 Thread Tom Wijsman
On Tue, 13 May 2014 06:08:52 +0400 Andrew Savchenko wrote: > 1. How tools like man or info are supposed to work with such > bundle? They are not expecting to have multiple man/info files into > single xz bundle. Hmm, true; they would need to be adapted, which involves talking to upstream. Benchm

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: using .xz for doc/man/info compression

2014-05-13 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Tue, 13 May 2014, Rich Freeman wrote: > Btrfs also supports file inlining, so every byte saved on small files > does actually help (I believe the data structure that stores the > inlined data doesn't have a fixed record size). Then again, btrfs > also supports lzo compression and I belie

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: enabling ipc-sandbox & network-sandbox by default

2014-05-13 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 1:28 AM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > Please do not enable them prior rigorous testing. > > I tried network-sandbox — this is a disaster. It brokes distcc > completely since distcc client can't connect to remote servers (and > even to a local one if any). Certainly agree on

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: using .xz for doc/man/info compression

2014-05-13 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 7:01 AM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > If we are trying to consider all possible cases, some filesystems > may benefit even from compression of very small files (e.g. from > 140 to 100 bytes) due to packing of multiple small files in the > same inode. ReiserFS is a good examp

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: using .xz for doc/man/info compression

2014-05-13 Thread Andrew Savchenko
On Tue, 13 May 2014 07:55:56 +0200 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > On Tue, 13 May 2014, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > > Please consider that by default du shows block size, not byte size. > > Than means that if file is actually 1234 bytes large, without -b it > > will be still accounted for 4096 bytes

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: enabling ipc-sandbox & network-sandbox by default

2014-05-13 Thread Luis Ressel
On Mon, 12 May 2014 19:39:09 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > I don't know postgresql well enough but does the test db reside > in temporary build directory? That is, can you guarantee that: > > 1) it will never ever collide with user's database, > > 2) it will be properly cleaned up even if the tes