By the way, any help for maintaining the libc++ stack is very welcome;
as you can see from the age of the current snapshots, it's been some
time I've not been playing with it.
Some notes:
- why not adding a clang subprofile ? there's one for amd64-fbsd; I had
been able to build a complete
Alexis Ballier wrote:
- why not adding a clang subprofile ? there's one for amd64-fbsd; I had
been able to build a complete stage 3 without too much trouble.
There's probably nothing bsd specific there, so moving
generic code from there to profiles/features should work.
I'd try to test
Does clang compile glibc already?
At the last GNU Cauldron the speaker said that clang fails because
of:[1]
- nested functions
- VLAIS
How did you avoid that problem?
Marco
[1]
http://www.youtube.ca/watch?v=mmiDwKgn6Holist=PLOGTP9W1DX5U53pPxtWdKkyiqe3GAn6Nd
Am Mon, 27 Oct 2014 11:20:00 +0100
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 12:07:25 +0100
M. Ziebell ziebell_ma...@posteo.de wrote:
Does clang compile glibc already?
At the last GNU Cauldron the speaker said that clang fails because
of:[1]
- nested functions
- VLAIS
How did you avoid that problem?
by using freebsd's libc :)
only problem
Am Mon, 27 Oct 2014 12:10:51 +0100
schrieb Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org:
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 12:07:25 +0100
M. Ziebell ziebell_ma...@posteo.de wrote:
Does clang compile glibc already?
At the last GNU Cauldron the speaker said that clang fails because
of:[1]
- nested functions
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 12:29:40 +0100
M. Ziebell ziebell_ma...@posteo.de wrote:
Am Mon, 27 Oct 2014 12:10:51 +0100
schrieb Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org:
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 12:07:25 +0100
M. Ziebell ziebell_ma...@posteo.de wrote:
Does clang compile glibc already?
At the last
Am 27. Oct 2014, 11:14 schrieb Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org:
By the way, any help for maintaining the libc++ stack is very welcome;
as you can see from the age of the current snapshots, it's been some
time I've not been playing with it.
Some notes:
- why not adding a clang
Am 27. Oct 2014, 12:07 schrieb M. Ziebell ziebell_ma...@posteo.de:
Does clang compile glibc already?
At the last GNU Cauldron the speaker said that clang fails because
of:[1]
- nested functions
- VLAIS
How did you avoid that problem?
Even without this issues there remains the fact that
- libcxxabi is probably the new way to go instead of libcxxrt; last
time I checked there was a chicken and egg problem: libcxxabi needed
clang + libc++ to build, so bootstrapping the stack was a bit
painful.
I give libcxxabi a try.
Does anybody has a bit insight in the current status
Patrick Lauer (patrick):
patrick 14/10/27 02:58:21
Modified: stone-soup-0.14.1.ebuild
stone-soup-0.15.1-r1.ebuild
stone-soup-0.15.1.ebuild stone-soup-0.13.2.ebuild
stone-soup-0.14.2.ebuild ChangeLog
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 09:04:19PM +, Howard Chu wrote:
Robin H. Johnson (robbat2) wrote:
robbat2 14/10/27 19:15:09
Removed: openldap-2.4.40-db-6.patch
Log:
Upstream OpenLDAP nixes bdb6 functionality.
Not entirely accurate. We didn't nix all of BDB 6 - you
# Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org (27 Oct 2014)
# Multiple QA issues (#344187, #319433, #317575, #174466)
# no upstream releases for a long time.
# Masked for removal in 30 days
mail-filter/spamassassin-fuzzyocr
(ack'ed by chutzpah)
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 19:58:15 +
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
I want to keep the over-long description unless we have some sort of
ebuild aliases.
longdescription /
jer
This fixes _dep_check_composite_db to mask packages that aren't the
highest visible match, but only if an update is desirable. This causes
desirable updates to get pulled in for cases like bug #526160. The
included unit test simulates the virtual/pypy update that triggered
the bug.
X-Gentoo-Bug:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
LGTM, Zac. Go ahead and push.
- --
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Sure. Go ahead and push, Zac.
- --
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 27/10/14 08:33, Zac Medico wrote:
+ if not
self._depgraph._virt_deps_visible( +
new_child,
ignore_use=True): +
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 27/10/14 09:22, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
On 27/10/14 08:33, Zac Medico wrote:
+if not
self._depgraph._virt_deps_visible( +
new_child,
ignore_use=True): +
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I give up. You'll figure it out.
- --
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
On 10/27/2014 01:22 AM, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
On 27/10/14 08:33, Zac Medico wrote:
+if not
self._depgraph._virt_deps_visible( +
new_child,
ignore_use=True): +
On 27/10/14 07:05, Zac Medico wrote:
On 10/26/2014 12:31 PM, Michael Palimaka wrote:
On 26/10/14 07:57, Zac Medico wrote:
On 10/25/2014 01:32 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
On 10/25/2014 01:26 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2014-10-25, o godz. 12:53:15
Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
These
On 10/27/2014 06:15 AM, Michael Palimaka wrote:
On 27/10/14 07:05, Zac Medico wrote:
On 10/26/2014 12:31 PM, Michael Palimaka wrote:
I've sent updated patches based on the last feedback. Should I send a
new one with the aliases, and if so, should the portage checks use the
alias or real
Users may not want some symlinks to get clobbered, so protect them
with CONFIG_PROTECT. Changes were required in the dblink.mergeme method
and the new_protect_filename function.
The changes to dblink.mergeme do 3 things:
* Move the bulk of config protection logic from dblink.mergeme to a
new
This fixes a case with --onlydeps were dep_zapdeps would pull in an
avoidable direct circular dependency on an onlydeps node. The logic
changes only apply to --onlydeps, so there's no chance of regressions
for cases when --onlydeps is not enabled.
X-Gentoo-Bug: 524916
X-Gentoo-Bug-URL:
This includes numerous logic adjustments that are needed to support
protected symlinks. The show_diff function now supports arbitrary
file types. For example, a diff between two symlinks looks like this:
-SYM: /foo/bar - baz
+SYM: /foo/bar - blah
X-Gentoo-Bug: 485598
X-Gentoo-Bug-URL:
This includes numerous logic adjustments that are needed to support
protected symlinks. The new diff_mixed function is used for diffs
between arbitrary file types. For example, a diff between two symlinks
looks like this:
-SYM: /foo/bar - baz
+SYM: /foo/bar - blah
X-Gentoo-Bug: 485598
26 matches
Mail list logo
