Patrick McLean posted on Wed, 29 Jul 2015 15:35:02 -0700 as excerpted:
> On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 01:11:30 +0300 Alon Bar-Lev
> wrote:
>
>> On 29 July 2015 at 23:20, William Hubbs wrote:
>>>
>>> so that there is a better idea out there of what I'm talking about,
>>> the OpenRC github repository now
On 30/07/2015 00:22, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 01:11:30AM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>> On 29 July 2015 at 23:20, William Hubbs wrote:
>>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> so that there is a better idea out there of what I'm talking about, the
>>> OpenRC github repository now has a mount-serv
On 30 July 2015 at 01:33, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 05:22:54PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 01:11:30AM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>> > On 29 July 2015 at 23:20, William Hubbs wrote:
>> > >
>> > > All,
>> > >
>> > > so that there is a better idea out
On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 01:11:30 +0300
Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On 29 July 2015 at 23:20, William Hubbs wrote:
> >
> > All,
> >
> > so that there is a better idea out there of what I'm talking about,
> > the OpenRC github repository now has a mount-service branch.
>
> Nice!
>
> But I still trying to
On 30 July 2015 at 01:22, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 01:11:30AM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>> On 29 July 2015 at 23:20, William Hubbs wrote:
>> >
>> > All,
>> >
>> > so that there is a better idea out there of what I'm talking about, the
>> > OpenRC github repository now has a
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 05:22:54PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 01:11:30AM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > On 29 July 2015 at 23:20, William Hubbs wrote:
> > >
> > > All,
> > >
> > > so that there is a better idea out there of what I'm talking about, the
> > > OpenRC github
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 01:11:30AM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On 29 July 2015 at 23:20, William Hubbs wrote:
> >
> > All,
> >
> > so that there is a better idea out there of what I'm talking about, the
> > OpenRC github repository now has a mount-service branch.
>
> Nice!
>
> But I still tryin
On 29 July 2015 at 23:20, William Hubbs wrote:
>
> All,
>
> so that there is a better idea out there of what I'm talking about, the
> OpenRC github repository now has a mount-service branch.
Nice!
But I still trying to figure out why do we need to keep fstab around.
It is pure legacy.
There can
Daniel Campbell (zlg) posted on Wed, 29 Jul 2015 01:54:03 -0700 as
excerpted:
> On 07/28/2015 06:57 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
>>
>> I don't quite understand your question, but I'll give it a shot.
>>
>> With the new mount service, it will not matter whether the file systems
>> are local or on the
Our bug queue has 83 bugs!
If you have some spare time, please help assign/sort a few bugs.
To view the bug queue, click here: http://bit.ly/m8PQS5
Thanks!
All,
so that there is a better idea out there of what I'm talking about, the
OpenRC github repository now has a mount-service branch.
This is not on master for a very good reason; it is prototype material,
definitely pre-alpha at this point.
If you don't know how to mess with github branches, or
# James Le Cuirot (29 Jul 2015)
# dev-java/soap is fixable but it and its related packages are all
# dead upstream. Removal in 30 days. See bug #556250.
dev-java/jldap
dev-java/openspml
dev-java/openspml2
dev-java/soap
--
James Le Cuirot (chewi)
Gentoo Linux Developer
pgpRA8ZVZyskS.pgp
Descrip
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/28/2015 06:57 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 07:25:20PM -0700, Daniel Campbell (zlg)
> wrote:
>> What would a migration be like? For example, I manage
>> filesystems exclusively through fstab (to my knowledge). Would
>> this
13 matches
Mail list logo
