# Hans de Graaff (2020-05-24)
# No releases since 2011, upstream is gone, fails tests,
# no reverse dependencies.
# Masked for removal in 30 days.
dev-ruby/rack-mount
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 10:21 PM Joonas Niilola wrote:
>
>
> On 5/24/20 5:41 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > Also, people are likely to disable this accidentally via USE="-*".
>
> Counts as
>
> > if they want to break their system intentionally.
Yes, but unfortunately catalyst's stage1 build does exa
On 5/24/20 5:41 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> Also, people are likely to disable this accidentally via USE="-*".
Counts as
> if they want to break their system intentionally.
>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 5:36 PM Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
>
> 'tc-directly' tracker https://bugs.gentoo.org/243502 tracks
> packages that don't respect users' CC/AR/LD flags.
>
> I added new USE=-native-symlinks mode for gcc-config and
> binutils-config to ease detection of such packages.
>
> Nati
> USE=-native-symlinks removes a bunch of links that most packages use by
> default
> until are overridden explicitly. Incomplete list is:
> - /lib/cpp
> - /usr/bin/{gcc,cc,g++,c++,...}
> - /usr/bin/{as,ld,ranlib,dwp,...}
>
> The rule of thumb is: if a tool does not have ${CTARGET}- prefix it wil
On Sat, 23 May 2020 14:56:06 -0400
Mike wrote:
> On 5/22/20 2:57 PM, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> > Originally found in bug #705240 as:
> >
> > ```
> > error=0
> > ...
> > if [[ ${error} > 0 ]]; then
> > ...
> > ```
> >
> > '>' are string comparisons. They are benign in this case, but
Am 23.05.2020 um 23:46 schrieb Daniel Pielmeier:
Hm correct me if I am wrong, but from looking at the patch Zac provided
I think he meant that the time portage consumes is only one second while
the "rest" is 3.2 seconds. So there is probably a potential in improving
the "rest" somehow.
Yes an
Am May 23, 2020 9:17:46 PM UTC schrieb Daniel Buschke
:
>Am 23.05.2020 um 22:55 schrieb Zac Medico:
>> Since the portage API only added about 1 second to the python script
>> time, I guess it's on par with your bash implementation. ;-P
>
>Yeah, if you substract the second for loading and the secon
Am 23.05.2020 um 22:55 schrieb Zac Medico:
Since the portage API only added about 1 second to the python script
time, I guess it's on par with your bash implementation. ;-P
Yeah, if you substract the second for loading and the second for doing
queries, then yes, it's pretty par with the bash i
On 5/23/20 1:41 PM, magic-gen...@damage.devloop.de wrote:
> Am 23.05.2020 um 22:20 schrieb Zac Medico:
>> On 5/23/20 1:02 PM, magic-gen...@damage.devloop.de wrote:
>>> I rewrote e-file in python by using the portage API [1]. But loading the
>>> API slows down the whole script. Is there any way to s
Am 23.05.2020 um 22:20 schrieb Zac Medico:
On 5/23/20 1:02 PM, magic-gen...@damage.devloop.de wrote:
I rewrote e-file in python by using the portage API [1]. But loading the
API slows down the whole script. Is there any way to speed up my
implementation? Have I done something fundamentally wrong
Hi,
Am 23.05.2020 um 22:08 schrieb Michał Górny:
On Sat, 2020-05-23 at 22:02 +0200, magic-gen...@damage.devloop.de wrote:
I rewrote e-file in python by using the portage API [1]. But loading the
API slows down the whole script. Is there any way to speed up my
implementation? Have I done somethi
On 5/23/20 1:02 PM, magic-gen...@damage.devloop.de wrote:
> Hi,
> the current e-file tool of app-portage/pfl is written in bash. e-file is
> a CLI tool which searches portagefilelist.de for a given file and list
> additional informations based on the local portage. Latter is done by
> grep'ing thro
On Sat, 2020-05-23 at 22:02 +0200, magic-gen...@damage.devloop.de wrote:
> Hi,
> the current e-file tool of app-portage/pfl is written in bash. e-file is
> a CLI tool which searches portagefilelist.de for a given file and list
> additional informations based on the local portage. Latter is done b
Hi,
the current e-file tool of app-portage/pfl is written in bash. e-file is
a CLI tool which searches portagefilelist.de for a given file and list
additional informations based on the local portage. Latter is done by
grep'ing through the ebuild files which is fast but IMHO not very smart.
I
gnome-python-common-r1.eclass: Mark as DEAD
- No consumers left in Gentoo ebuild repository
- Removal in 30 days, bug #640022
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On 5/22/20 2:57 PM, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> Originally found in bug #705240 as:
>
> ```
> error=0
> ...
> if [[ ${error} > 0 ]]; then
> ...
> ```
>
> '>' are string comparisons. They are benign in this case, but let's
> be consistent and use integer comparison.
>
> CC: ker...@gento
# Andreas Sturmlechner (2020-05-23)
# Obsolete GNOME 2 era packages, stuck on Python 2 and pygtk,
# bugs #640022, #708094. Masked for removal in 30 days.
dev-python/gconf-python
dev-python/gnome-python-base
dev-python/pygtksourceview
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message p
On Fri, 22 May 2020 21:58:54 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> Let's put it like this. This thing starts working. Package X is
> broken, and we see that almost nobody is using it. We remove that
> package. Now somebody is angry. He submits a lot of fake data to
> render the service useless so that
On Fri, 22 May 2020 22:13:11 +
Peter Stuge wrote:
> While services such as reCAPTCHA are (as said) massively intrusive, there
> are other, much less intrusive and even terminal-compatible ways to construct
> a CAPTCHA. Hello game developers, you have 80x23 "pixels" to render a puzzle
> for a
On Fri, 22 May 2020 12:53:03 -0700
Brian Dolbec wrote:
> We cannot exclude overlays which will have cat/pkg not in the main
> gentoo repo. So, we should not excludea submission that includes a few
> of these. They would just become irrelevant outliers to our
> processesing of the data. In fact
On Fri, 22 May 2020 23:42:48 +0100
Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> For both multilib and non-multilib profiles binutils provides
> tools with native ABI prefix only. For example on amd64 there
> is only 'x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-nm' and 'nm'.
>
> On abi_x86_32 tools are usually configured with --host=i68
On Sat, 2020-05-23 at 09:54 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 22-05-2020 21:58:54 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Let's put it like this. This thing starts working. Package X is
> > broken, and we see that almost nobody is using it. We remove that
> > package. Now somebody is angry. He submits
On 22-05-2020 21:58:54 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> Let's put it like this. This thing starts working. Package X is
> broken, and we see that almost nobody is using it. We remove that
> package. Now somebody is angry. He submits a lot of fake data to
> render the service useless so that we don
On Sat, 2020-05-23 at 08:48 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > > > > > On Fri, 22 May 2020, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Hence my question: do you find 'do not remove kernels listed in
> > bootloader config' feature useful? Do you think it should remain the
> > default? Do you think it is worthwhile to co
On Sat, 23 May 2020 08:05:46 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-05-22 at 22:36 +0100, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> > 'tc-directly' tracker https://bugs.gentoo.org/243502 tracks
> > packages that don't respect users' CC/AR/LD flags.
> >
> > I added new USE=-native-symlinks mode for gcc-confi
26 matches
Mail list logo
