Hello!
It turns out that I don't have enough time to maintain these packages any more:
Has reverse dependencies:
* dev-db/oracle-instantclient (no fetch restriction any more)
Obsolete, updating revdeps not initiated yet:
* dev-db/oracle-instantclient-basic
* dev-db/oracle-instantclient-jdbc
* de
On 2021-04-22 21:23, Sam James wrote:
Such pkg_setups are best avoided if possible because they can be
confusing and we have other tools to handle it, so I’m glad you asked!
I’d provide a USE flag for this tool and mask it on non-multilib amd64
profiles (or mask everywhere and unmask on the multi
Ah, looks like attachment isn't attached, post my ebuild in plain text.
EAPI=7
inherit multilib toolchain-funcs
DESCRIPTION="Open source assembly language compiler"
HOMEPAGE="https://flatassembler.net";
SRC_URI="https://flatassembler.net/${P}.tgz";
LICENSE="MIT"
SLOT="0"
KEYWORDS="amd64 x86"
> On 22 Apr 2021, at 22:07, Nekun wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
Hi!
> Working on the fasm ebuild, have some questions:
>
> 1. fasm is written on itself and has two variants: self-contained binary for
> x86 and amd64 and linked with libc only for x86. Also, there are tools for
> working with the pr
Hi all,
Working on the fasm ebuild, have some questions:
1. fasm is written on itself and has two variants: self-contained binary
for x86 and amd64 and linked with libc only for x86. Also, there are
tools for working with the proprietary symbolic information format which
is libc-linked and on
On 2021-03-27 23:40, Joshua Kinard wrote:
The MIPS machine has functioning local disk drives, and currently, it
boots fine by just pulling a kernel off my TFTP server and booting
from the local drive, no initramfs needed because I compiled
everything into it.
Out of curiosity, if your kernel i
On 2021-03-29 10:06, James Le Cuirot wrote:
Have you seen CONFIG_CMDLINE? It lets you bake command line args into
the kernel image itself.
And since 5.6, there is also bootconfig:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/admin-guide/bootconfig.html
--
MS
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenP
On giovedì 22 aprile 2021 15:45:11 CEST Theo Anderson wrote:
> Hi Agostino,
>
> After some discussion in IRC we've agreed to have the maintainer of
> the respective packages be assigned to the bug with guru@g.o be CC'd.
> Where no maintainer exists for a package guru@g.o remains as the
> assignee.
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 01:45:11PM +, Theo Anderson wrote:
> After some discussion in IRC we've agreed to have the maintainer of
> the respective packages be assigned to the bug with guru@g.o be CC'd.
> Where no maintainer exists for a package guru@g.o remains as the
> assignee. If you could ma
> On 22 Apr 2021, at 14:31, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
>
> Thanks for all feedback.
>
> Please discuss all points internally (branch, email, trackers and so on) and
> send me an email with all changes you would like to have.
As an aside, I do appreciate the CI and it’s turned out to be pretty us
On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:30:10 +0200
Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> On giovedì 22 aprile 2021 12:22:00 CEST Theo Anderson wrote:
> > On the subject of many bugs, there are now almost 150 open bugs
> > assigned to g...@gentoo.org. With this has come quite an email
> > avalanche for which I think people m
Thanks for all feedback.
Please discuss all points internally (branch, email, trackers and so on) and
send me an email with all changes you would like to have.
Agostino
> On 22 Apr 2021, at 11:50, Joakim Tjernlund
> wrote:
>
> I have noted that python, portage and gentoolkit appers to install many MB of
> what appers
> to be test code:
> python: /usr/lib/python*/test, /usr/lib/python*/ctypes/test,
> /usr/lib/python*/lib2to3/tests,
>/usr/lib/python*/
> On 22 Apr 2021, at 13:59, Ionen Wolkens wrote:
> [snip]
> And, even if you don't see it like that, someday someone may want
> to go on a fixing spree using those trackers (may it be for ::guru
> or ::gentoo) but will keep seeing them mixed up together.
Yes, this is particularly apt for me. L
On giovedì 22 aprile 2021 14:59:00 CEST Ionen Wolkens wrote:
> And, even if you don't see it like that, someday someone may want
> to go on a fixing spree using those trackers (may it be for ::guru
> or ::gentoo) but will keep seeing them mixed up together.
You can do it as wel by doing a separate
On 22/04/2021 14:39, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
On giovedì 22 aprile 2021 12:02:20 CEST Michał Górny wrote:
Well, I suppose scanning the dev branch would be preferable over
the master branch. In reality, they are usually only a few hours apart
but it might be useful to know of new breakage in dev
On Thu, 2021-04-22 at 14:39 +0200, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> On giovedì 22 aprile 2021 12:02:20 CEST Michał Górny wrote:
> > Well, I suppose scanning the dev branch would be preferable over
> > the master branch. In reality, they are usually only a few hours apart
> > but it might be useful to kno
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 8:39 AM Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
>
> On giovedì 22 aprile 2021 12:02:20 CEST Michał Górny wrote:
> > Well, I suppose scanning the dev branch would be preferable over
> > the master branch. In reality, they are usually only a few hours apart
> > but it might be useful to kno
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 02:39:02PM +0200, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> On giovedì 22 aprile 2021 12:02:20 CEST Michał Górny wrote:
> > One more thing: might be a good idea to consider splitting some
> > of the 'big' trackers (like CFLAGS) between Gentoo and GURU. I think
> > solving these bugs in GUR
On Thu, 2021-04-22 at 10:50 +, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> I have noted that python, portage and gentoolkit appers to install many MB of
> what appers
> to be test code:
> python: /usr/lib/python*/test, /usr/lib/python*/ctypes/test,
> /usr/lib/python*/lib2to3/tests,
> /usr/lib/python*/u
On giovedì 22 aprile 2021 12:02:20 CEST Michał Górny wrote:
> Well, I suppose scanning the dev branch would be preferable over
> the master branch. In reality, they are usually only a few hours apart
> but it might be useful to know of new breakage in dev before it's merged
> to master.
>
> It wo
On giovedì 22 aprile 2021 12:22:00 CEST Theo Anderson wrote:
> On the subject of many bugs, there are now almost 150 open bugs
> assigned to g...@gentoo.org. With this has come quite an email avalanche
> for which I think people must have set up mail filters by now. I
> imagine this means that bugs
On giovedì 22 aprile 2021 12:25:50 CEST Michał Górny wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-04-22 at 11:59 +0200, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I would like to let you know that the CI is now able to work with
> > overlays.
> >
> > Since Guru is pretty active I took advantage of this situation to
> >
I have noted that python, portage and gentoolkit appers to install many MB of
what appers
to be test code:
python: /usr/lib/python*/test, /usr/lib/python*/ctypes/test,
/usr/lib/python*/lib2to3/tests,
/usr/lib/python*/unittest, /usr/lib/python*/distutils/tests ...
portage/gentoolkit: /us
On Thu, 2021-04-22 at 11:59 +0200, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to let you know that the CI is now able to work with overlays.
>
> Since Guru is pretty active I took advantage of this situation to implement
> and test the CI
>
> Atm it has been configured to work with maste
On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 11:59:21 +0200
Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to let you know that the CI is now able to work with
> overlays.
>
> Since Guru is pretty active I took advantage of this situation to
> implement and test the CI
Thank you for implementing this, it certainly
On Thu, 2021-04-22 at 11:59 +0200, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to let you know that the CI is now able to work with overlays.
>
> Since Guru is pretty active I took advantage of this situation to implement
> and test the CI
>
> Atm it has been configured to work with maste
Hello,
I would like to let you know that the CI is now able to work with overlays.
Since Guru is pretty active I took advantage of this situation to implement
and test the CI
Atm it has been configured to work with master branch.
I don't know how much is useful scan the dev branch since a first
Dne 22. 04. 21 v 8:37 Kaibo Ma napsal(a):
Is there a tracking issue for Java 11 on Bugzilla?
Kaibo Ma
this is it: https://bugs.gentoo.org/697014
fordfrog
# Michał Górny (2021-04-22)
# py3.7 backport with no revdeps left.
# Removal on 2021-05-22. Bug #784983.
dev-python/idna-ssl
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
30 matches
Mail list logo