On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 10:48:18PM +0100, Grobian wrote:
On 01-01-2006 21:35:34 +0100, Francesco Riosa wrote with possible deletions:
1) bzip2 them in some way.
4) compress Changelog entries where possible
Anyone gathered transfer stats for rsync without --whole-file?
compression won't play
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 10:05:52PM -0800, Corey Shields wrote:
Where is the centralized vision that everyone is working together here that
people not directly related to each project will buy in to and therefore do
what they can to see it succeed?
We've had centralized visions for a long
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 03:11:38PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Nerry there now... Changes:
* Due to overwhelming demand (it's the thing in this GLEP that has
generated least contention!), spaces are not allowed in repository
names.
+1 on this revision, although I demand a pony.
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 11:52:22PM -0500, Andrew Muraco wrote:
noticed something that doesn't make any sense:
Andrew Muraco wrote:
- the existing portage code would consider +arch as a subset of arch,
the reason both keywords will exist is to maintain compatibility with
older versions
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 11:42:36PM -0500, Andrew Muraco wrote:
Anyways, I would personally like to see if this can stir some interest.
I would be willing to help test and help make this GLEP a reality,
however I can not implement this myself as I lack python skills, but I
do want to help
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 09:27:23AM -0600, Lance Albertson wrote:
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 02:36 -0700, Duncan wrote:
OTOH, it's entirely possible a Gentoo /based/ enterprise distribution may
emerge at some point. IMO, however, there's enough conflict with what
makes
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 10:05:49AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 09:00 +, Chris Bainbridge wrote:
On 06/01/06, Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Probably better to iron out what y'all actually need and what the dev
community is willing to put up
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 10:55:50AM -0600, Lance Albertson wrote:
A few rough ideas that just popped in my
head is either packing all of these versions into one tarball (not even
sure if thats feasible)
Ugly, binpkgs are bzip2ed tarballs + xpak at the end of the bzip2
stream, jamming multiple
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 11:30:16PM +, Stuart Herbert wrote:
On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 12:54 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote:
We could start a public wiki displaying all herds and projects. It would
be great to add some low level docs, herds/project goals, ideas and so.
Even the users could
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 05:28:04PM +0100, Andrea Barisani wrote:
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 05:21:42PM +0100, Jakub Moc wrote:
9.1.2006, 17:12:31, Andrea Barisani wrote:
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 11:08:38AM -0500, solar wrote:
Do you think the PDEPEND of the ca-certs should be
Sending this to the ml, tom already has heard the reasons but throwing
them out for others to comment on...
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 04:47:57PM +, Tom Martin wrote:
I realize this doesn't address the *rest* of what you said, though...
snip
These little 'howtos' are potentially very
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 02:17:50PM +0100, Paweł Madej wrote:
Hello,
Today i've noticed that common user do not have /sbin and /usr/sbin dirs
in their PATH but they can start all the tasks from that directories for
example on server machine someone could make /sbin/shutdown and turn the
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 08:06:12PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 01:44, Brian Harring wrote:
Might I suggest this one just get shelved for a while?
everything that gets shelved portage way stays that way for *quite* a while
If people don't give a damn about it, yes
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 08:27:22PM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Wednesday 25 January 2006 18:10, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Jason Stubbs wrote:
DEPEND=x11-base/xorg-x11 # wrong
DEPEND=virtual/x11# wrong
DEPEND=|| ( x11? ( virtual/x11 ) )# wrong
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 09:18:28PM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Wednesday 25 January 2006 20:46, Brian Harring wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 08:27:22PM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Wednesday 25 January 2006 18:10, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Jason Stubbs wrote:
DEPEND=x11-base/xorg
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 06:06:02PM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Wednesday 25 January 2006 17:43, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Jason Stubbs wrote:
I'm not exactly sure what you mean by broken in the first paragraph nor
how a check can help with unmaintained (=no commits, no?) packages, but
Hola all-
We've got a new portage dev; Alec Warner, aka antarus- aside from
doc work, he'll be doing repoman work and the usual random bug
squashing.
His words-
I work at The Division of Engineering Computing Services at Michigan
State University. I serve primarily as an undergraduate web
Hola all-
Well looky here, we've got another new portage dev to report- Zac
Medico (zmedico). Areas of focus thus far are general stable work,
and work on the rewrite (you can thank him and marienz for the test
framework work).
Additionally, Zac is the maintainer of two external projects-
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 04:15:49PM +0100, Stephen Bennett wrote:
If noone has any strong reasonable objections, I'd like to add a
Paludis profile to the tree. This would use Paludis as the default
provider for virtual/portage (which is a less than ideal name, but that
is another discussion
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 05:47:42PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Tue, 16 May 2006 09:16:18 -0700 Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| 1) changes to the eapi=0 ebuild standard; renaming of vars
| (PORTAGE_* - PALUDIS_* namely)
What eapi=0 standard? We emulate Portage internals where
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 06:28:41PM +0100, Stephen Bennett wrote:
Brian Harring wrote:
The gain of the profile is that you can do a few new tricks for folks
doing boostrapping experiments- why not just introduce an ebuild that
sets up the new profile in a temp overlay?
No, the gain
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 07:07:05PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Tue, 16 May 2006 10:33:56 -0700 Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| What eapi=0 standard? We emulate Portage internals where it's found
| to be necessary, and don't otherwise.
|
| eapi=0 is what 2.1/2.05x supports
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 03:56:38PM -0700, Brian Harring wrote:
If your parent parsing implementation handled N parents on a single
line (rather then parent per line as you do now), portage would
explode rather then silently use the left most. Your implementation
isn't doing that however
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 12:11:34PM +0100, Stephen Bennett wrote:
On Wed, 17 May 2006 12:14:37 +0200
Paul de Vrieze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Using the normal profiles would also establish paludis as a possible
replacement of portage as primary package manager. Refraining from
doing so
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 02:57:05PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 17 May 2006 12:04:33 +0200 Paul de Vrieze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| - Paludis must be able to handle a standard portage /var/db/pkg tree.
| This means that paludis can read it, and write it. Enabling mixing
| portage
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 04:26:28PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 17 May 2006 17:11:04 +0200 Paul de Vrieze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Let me clarify my statement. I don't care about candy spinners.
| Paludis (or any other package manager that is to be integrated into
| gentoo) should
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 05:32:38PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 17 May 2006 11:23:19 +0200 Wernfried Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| We really should figure that stuff out before we start integrating an
| externally written package manager we have no influence on whatsoever
How
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 07:44:16PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 17 May 2006 11:13:09 -0700 Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Paludis can read a Portage-generated VDB. Portage can't read a
| Paludis-generated VDB, because Paludis has more features.
|
| What features
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 08:50:32PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 17 May 2006 12:06:09 -0700 Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Clarify on virtuals please. Unless you're mangling the data for
| sym/dir, that's an unmerge time decision (as such it's not vdb data
| specific
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 12:10:40PM +0900, Georgi Georgiev wrote:
Just two points:
- standards should not be set by the primary package manager
- the primary package manager does not have to be developed by Gentoo.
More about it below:
maillog: 20/05/2006-14:54:18(+0200): Paul de Vrieze
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 11:54:25AM -0400, Stephen P. Becker wrote:
Am I missing something obvious?
-g2boojum-
Probably just the blatant Ciaran hate, and the realization that people
will have to suck it up and deal with him if his package manager ever
becomes official for Gentoo. Who
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 04:22:30PM -0400, Ned Ludd wrote:
And now per arch breakdowns.
http://gentooexperimental.org/~ferringb/reports/arch-vulnerabilities/
Couple more reports generated (in the parent dir, dropped keywords,
imlate, packages that have just ~arch, ebuild metadata verification,
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 04:51:06PM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 16:22 -0400, Ned Ludd wrote:
And now per arch breakdowns.
http://gentooexperimental.org/~ferringb/reports/arch-vulnerabilities/
No offense, but that isn't exactly useful in its current form. For
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 05:46:09PM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
I completely understand this. However, in most cases the reason the
older packages are still in the tree is because *somebody* doesn't have
it stable yet.
Strictly stable, or unstable?
What about profiles, which to account
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 06:24:31PM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 15:05 -0700, Brian Harring wrote:
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 05:46:09PM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
I completely understand this. However, in most cases the reason the
older packages are still
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 09:14:01AM +0200, Danny van Dyk wrote:
Hello Mike,
Am Dienstag, 30. Mai 2006 05:29 schrieb Mike Kelly:
I'm Mike Kelly, one of the SoC-ers. I'll be working on GLEP 27 for
the summer. Right now I'm looking for some basic feedback on my
proposal.
In particular, I
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 03:00:13PM -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote:
Paul de Vrieze wrote: [Thu Jun 01 2006, 02:44:39PM CDT]
I would like the council to discuss GLEP 49 as has been discussed on
the list some weeks ago. It is about the package manager requirements.
Incidentally, I drafted a
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 10:19:41AM +0200, Harald van Dijk wrote:
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 03:45:50AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 05 June 2006 02:07, Harald van Dijk wrote:
Some gnustep stuff inherits cvs, but uses -D in the cvs options to
always download exactly the same thing.
Resurrecting this issue (yet another round) since FEATURES=debug-build
was shoved in...
Background info-
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/35202/focus=35212
Quick summary, there needs to be an easy way to flag on essentially
leave the symbols intact/don't mangle the code too
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 02:54:08AM +0200, Ioannis Aslanidis wrote:
On 6/9/06, Grant Goodyear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, what would people think of moving herds.xml from gentoo/misc into
the portage tree, with the rationale being that local tools could use
that information for various useful
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 08:16:32AM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 02:49 +0200, Markus Ullmann wrote:
This is a bug for an ebuild that the user does not think is related to
the pam_skey. Go back and read what I wrote.
it was agreed upon that we don't keep
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 05:08:23PM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 16:19 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 08 June 2006 21:08, Brian Harring wrote:
One additional to this- the location for the file in the tree *should*
be metadata/ - shoving it into profiles
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 09:58:01PM +0100, Stephen Bennett wrote:
Many things were discussed in the last round of this thread (Paludis
and Profiles, in case anyone missed it), and many useful points raised.
One of these, which seems to have been largely missed in amongst the
other noise, forms
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 11:49:58AM +1000, Daniel wrote:
On Sunday 11 June 2006 12:50, Brian Harring wrote:
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 05:08:23PM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 16:19 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 08 June 2006 21:08, Brian Harring wrote
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 09:00:29AM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 18:34 +0300, Marius Mauch wrote:
Patrick McLean schrieb:
I have absolutely zero experience with catalyst, but couldn't it be made
to create a source CD ISO when it is generating the binary one? Just
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 08:38:42AM -0500, Lance Albertson wrote:
Brian Harring wrote:
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 09:00:29AM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 18:34 +0300, Marius Mauch wrote:
Patrick McLean schrieb:
I have absolutely zero experience with catalyst
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 10:04:08AM -0500, Lance Albertson wrote:
Brian Harring wrote:
don't see why we need to have a public system setup as long as we can
provide the source when asked. As far as a I know, the GPL doesn't
dicate that we have to provide the sources in an internet media
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 02:24:49PM +0200, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 02:08 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
On Friday 07 July 2006 01:54, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| No, we never spent years telling them not to use your so-called
| CFLAGS hacks that are rather a
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 04:31:52PM -0700, Tuan Van wrote:
Jakub Moc wrote:
Ser Gio wrote:
Hello,
Why does x11-libs/gtk+-2.8.19 has the X useflag? The ebuild doesn't
look like it's using it.
thanks,
Sérgio
Because virtualx.eclass has it in IUSE and the ebuild inherits it.
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 09:05:03AM +0200, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 17:15:38 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 08:57:32 +0200 Kevin F. Quinn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Things that package moves cause:
| 1) Dependencies throughout the
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 08:41:46PM +0200, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 00:37:47 -0700
Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 09:05:03AM +0200, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 17:15:38 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 09:39:14PM +0200, Luca Longinotti wrote:
John Jawed wrote:
Below is a link to an enhanced input eclass as well as a screenshot.
This eclass was made to simplify interacting with the user at
pkg_config().
This is a good idea imo, it could really simplify and help
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 08:44:35AM +0100, Stuart Herbert wrote:
In fact, categories do not give us the complete ability to have two
packages with the same upstream name in the tree ... because binary
packages do not support category names at all.
B.
They do actually- the bintree
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 06:04:10PM +0200, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 01:05:20 -0700
Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately the category system is deeply embedded in portage
and the tree, so changing that system is simply not going to
happen, which is why
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 02:47:46PM +0200, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 12:19:28 +0100
Stuart Herbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just adding an alias
into a second category makes the tree more of a mess - not less.
The alias, once setup, can be left alone forever. As far as
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 02:24:17AM +0200, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
On Monday 31 July 2006 07:05, Seemant Kulleen wrote:
OK, let's start with: what exactly is the problem?
1) Please reread my replies in the first sunrise thread. Points are:
1) no security,
Suggest you read their responses, and
appreciate, if you would try to have a controversial
discussion, without starting to loose your manners.
And I'd appreciate a less condescending tone.
On Wednesday 02 August 2006 03:39, Brian Harring wrote:
1) no security,
Suggest you read their responses, and look into some of their material
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 10:27:04PM -0500, Lance Albertson wrote:
Brian Harring wrote:
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 08:05:15PM +0200, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
Local overlays are fine as the user exactly knows what he does in his
private
overlay (and hopefully follows eclass changes
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 09:54:18AM +0200, Simon Stelling wrote:
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
For example: mplayer
It has it's gui-less player and an gtk-based frontend in one package.
We should split this into two packages: mplayer and gmplayer.
The chances to get this done in the upstream *before*
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 08:31:55PM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
I read the portage-dev discussion, and I'm still not seeing how this is
superior to make.defaults.
The difference with use.force is that it prevents flags, that are
deemed extremely important, from being
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 09:57:39PM -0700, Ryan Tandy wrote:
Peter Gordon wrote:
Zac Medico wrote:
The difference with use.force is that it prevents flags, that are deemed
extremely important, from being accidentally disabled by the user.
If they were so extremely important then they would
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 07:23:31AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 21:41:39 -0700 Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| The use.force feature is complementary to use.mask. It's exactly
| the same concept, but inverted.
|
| And both files _should_ be implemented via
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 08:33:51AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 00:22:50 -0700 Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 07:23:31AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 21:41:39 -0700 Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| wrote
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 11:11:59AM +0100, Roy Marples wrote:
On Tuesday 08 August 2006 09:56, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
If you want an dhcp client, install dhcp-client, if you
want an dhcp server, install dhcp-server. Could it be simpler ?
Maybe you missed the part of the discussion where we
Pardon the spam, but correcting a misstatement on my part-
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 09:41:39PM -0700, Brian Harring wrote:
I know of selinux, and multilib- all that are effectively features,
and exist in the use conditional namespace because they
unfortunately straddle both (same issue
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 12:55:28PM +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
* Roy Marples [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On Tuesday 08 August 2006 09:56, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
If you want an dhcp client, install dhcp-client, if you
want an dhcp server, install dhcp-server. Could it be simpler ?
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 05:49:40PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 08 August 2006 15:18, Zac Medico wrote:
Stuart Herbert wrote:
Any chance of per-package USE defaults support? That's much more useful
to me.
Attached to bug 61732 there's a patch that implements this via a new
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 09:23:34PM +0200, Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 00:22:50 -0700,
Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
forcing cxx on via package.mask for gcc
sys-devel/gcc[-cxx]
If i want to build a cxx-free system, am i supposed to add
sys-devel/gcc
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 01:24:49PM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
Hi everyone,
Currently, portage only allows single inheritance in profiles, but
it's easy to enable multiple inheritance. In order to do this, we
only need to unconstrain the number of parents allowed in the parent
file (only 1
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 10:59:48PM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
Brian Harring wrote:
Said single inheritance protection was added 06/05/06 (rev 3544),
stabled for x86 roughly 06/22/06.
Hasn't even yet made it to a release media- meaning folk installing
from the most current release media
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 09:14:24AM +0200, Michael Weyersh??user wrote:
Abhay Kedia wrote:
Can someone suggest an appropriate alternate please?
I don't know if it's appropriate since I never used alsaplayer, but
mpeg123 is a good player for Just play me this file on a console
without much
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 08:26:41AM -0400, Alec Warner wrote:
A project exists if it has a web page at www.g.o/proj/en/whatever that
is maintained. (Maintained means that the information on the page is
factually correct and not out-of-date.) If the webpage isn't maintained,
it is presumed dead.
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 06:57:22PM +0200, Danny van Dyk wrote:
Am Freitag, 1. September 2006 17:05 schrieb Alec Warner:
Stefan Schweizer wrote:
Hi,
Repoman needs to check for deprecated eclasses, see
http://bugs.gentoo.org/141677
As a result of the discussion in the bug, we
On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 01:37:26AM +0200, Danny van Dyk wrote:
Am Freitag, 1. September 2006 19:37 schrieb Brian Harring:
old new
- --
foo.eclass new-foo.eclass
We don't need a new file for that IMHO. I'd propose
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 09:54:09PM -0700, Daniel Ostrow wrote:
snip
I like this option better than sticking another file into the public
tree that no user will ever need.
Instead, modifying the eclass metadata and adding two new keys, that
users will never need is fine? :)
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 03:53:02PM -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote:
Brian Harring wrote: [Mon Sep 04 2006, 01:04:21AM CDT]
49 (alt package manager 1) -- R (by council; sane API preferred)
50 (alt package manager 2) -- R (by council; sane API preferred)
Might want to clarify the sane API
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 02:33:14AM -0400, Doug Goldstein wrote:
While I'm still awake...
Here's a list of unused local USE flags that aren't used anymore and got
axed.
I stopped at USE flags that start with J...
Missed a few before j from the looks of it- attached is a list of
unused
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 10:29:11AM +, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
Hola,
I've been inspired by the local/global USE flag threads recently
posted by Doug (Cardoe), and it got me to thinking... I've recently
joined the pkgcore development effort, and was asked by Brian
(ferringb) what I'd like
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 09:31:56AM -0400, Michael Cummings wrote:
Brian Harring wrote:
mail-filter/spamassassin: use.local.desc unused flag(s): extramodules,
pyzor, razor, spf
me thinks there be a bug here - I've removed extramodules from
use.local.desc, but the others are still used
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 10:37:21PM -0400, Stephen P. Becker wrote:
Carsten Lohrke wrote:
On Sunday 03 September 2006 16:36, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
I am not adding stuff. I am fixing existing packages. And I am taking
responsibility.
How wonderful this sort of maintenance is you can read
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 10:34:52AM -0400, Aron Griffis wrote:
From bind-9.3.2-r4.ebuild:
# idea from dev-libs/cyrus-sasl
if has distcc ${FEATURES}; then
einfo You have \distcc\ enabled
einfo build with MAKEOPTS=\-j1\
jobs=-j1
else
einfo build
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 11:22:11PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Protected locations are determined by the ``CONFIG_PROTECT`` environment
variable, which is defined in the profiles and which may be augmented or
overridden by the current environment and user configuration files.
The user env
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 12:15:34AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:02:53 -0700 Chris White [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| On Monday 11 September 2006 15:22, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| * Otherwise, try again with ``._cfg0001_name``, then
| ``._cfg0002_name`` and so on (base
On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 11:02:06PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 00:17:21 -0700 Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 11:22:11PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| Protected locations are determined by the ``CONFIG_PROTECT``
| environment variable
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 01:38:59PM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote:
Alin Nastac wrote:
I reckon this could be solved by yet another *DEPEND variable. The only
atoms accepted by this variable would be CATEGORY/PN. Every time when
a package gets updated from PV1 to PV2 (distinct versions, revisions
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 09:49:18AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 21 September 2006 09:34, Marius Mauch wrote:
Manifest2 records do not contain a MD5 checksum. The only guaranteed
checksum type there is SHA1. So once manifest1 is phased out the tree
will not contain MD5 checksums
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 09:52:27AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 21 September 2006 07:59, Brian Harring wrote:
Why have the explicit var? Because 0.9.7a through 0.9.7c may all be
compatible, but 0.9.7d isn't. If you force an automatic algo that
tries to (effectively) guess, you
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 05:38:08PM +0300, Alin Nastac wrote:
Brian Harring wrote:
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 01:38:59PM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote:
There is one flaw with this though; packages can provide both
libraries _and_ binaries. Our dependencies don't represent whether
the dep
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 10:43:11AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 21 September 2006 10:04, Brian Harring wrote:
I agree; while I'm labeling it ABI, includes both bad soname handling
and seperate sonames.
those people should be smacked (for the interest of disclosure, i have
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 08:15:48PM +0300, Alin Nastac wrote:
Brian Harring wrote:
BDEPEND was actually a seperate proposal/idea, intention there was to
have that be the deps that *must* be CHOST (gcc would be an example);
bits that are used to actually build the pkg, not data it consumes
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 06:20:44AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 21 September 2006 11:08, Brian Harring wrote:
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 10:43:11AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
i'm referring to the specific file of course, not anything else in the
package ... so integrating
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 09:50:12AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 23 September 2006 09:14, Brian Harring wrote:
You're assuming that after the merge of the pkg that breaks
compatibility, building is actually _still_ possible for the depends.
of course i am; i just said
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 10:34:03AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 23 September 2006 10:24, Alin Nastac wrote:
I see only libraries in NEEDED and it is probably generated
automatically. There is no way for the automatic tools to discover the
dependency between pptpd and ppp
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 11:31:12PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 23 September 2006 10:30, Brian Harring wrote:
dlopen?
we already said that this will need a new depend variable
How does this fix openssl horkage? (bad soname handling)
it wont, but such things are broken
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 02:24:41AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 25 September 2006 14:16, Brian Harring wrote:
Bad soname handling is just *part* of what BINCOMPAT could do; it's
not the sole reason for it's existance, as such it's not quite right
dismissing it just because
On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 02:01:08PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 27 September 2006 03:54, Brian Harring wrote:
Bleh, this is getting back to exactly my point that it's unbounded
resolution. To support this, every step of execution would require
scanning for dangling nodes
On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 09:52:14AM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Tiziano Müller wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi everyone
It seems that setting the number of parallel builds using '-jN' does not
only work for make, but also for scons and bjam (and maybe others as
It's low maintenance; only thing needed is either to rebase to my
libtransform work, or add proper xz support.
Either way, any questions, let me know.
~brian
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:16 AM, Sergey Popov pinkb...@gentoo.org wrote:
16.06.2013 13:49, Pacho Ramos пишет:
Due ferringb retirement
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 12:21:23AM +0200, Petteri R??ty wrote:
My notes so far:
1) Status quo
- does not allow changing inherit
- bash version in global scope
- global scope in general is quite locked down
2) EAPI in file extension
- Allows changing global scope and the internal
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 01:42:38PM +0100, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
Le mardi 24 février 2009 à 09:47 -0800, Brian Harring a écrit :
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 11:26:48PM -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
This is your friendly reminder! Same bat time (typically the 2nd 4th
Thursdays at 2000
1 - 100 of 813 matches
Mail list logo
