On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 12:51:59AM +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> Alec Warner wrote:
> >> Those get uploaded and look fine but after 6 months they are suddenly
> >> being removed by the script.
> >>
> >
> > There is a distfiles whitelist[1] for this exact purpose...isn't there?
> >
> > [1]
> >
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 11:35:50PM +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> But I can see that you are a bit frustrated because you did not get your way
> through. So here is a guide of what you can do. I will gladly stop using
> workarounds when I am allowed to have an equally bugfree and fast workflow
>
On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 09:42:44PM +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 13:39:26 -0700
> Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > -r* is an ebuild convention; upstream (exemption of older daft portage
> > releases) doesn't use it, as such w
On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 09:35:06PM +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 08:31:31 -0700
> Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Be aware that if you reuse the vercmp logic, you're getting the
> > special case float comparison rules, mea
On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 02:27:19PM +, Philip Walls wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 02:34:08PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 12:51:19 + Philip Walls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > | This argument here can also be applied to the -r#.# solution you
> > | mentioned,
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 11:05:22PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> In designing an enterprise infrastructure around Gentoo at my place of
> employment, I have discovered a feature that would improve Gentoo's
> usefulness greatly in this field.
>
> I'm writing to ask for your opin
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 08:37:48PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 12:27:20 -0700 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | Ebuilds already have a boatload of duplication;
>
> They have no duplication related to whether a USE flag is enabled.
...B
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 08:22:01PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 15:09:32 -0400 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | On Sunday 15 October 2006 14:16, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> | > On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 02:09:58 -0400 Mike Frysinger
> | > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> | > | wha
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 03:52:08PM -0400, Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 15:30:03 -0400 Chris Gianelloni
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >| On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 19:44 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> >| > On Wed, 11 Oct 2
On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 09:52:14AM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Tiziano Müller wrote:
> >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >Hash: SHA1
> >
> >Hi everyone
> >
> >It seems that setting the number of parallel builds using '-jN' does not
> >only work for make, but also for scons and bjam (and may
On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 02:01:08PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 September 2006 03:54, Brian Harring wrote:
> > > > Bleh, this is getting back to exactly my point that it's unbounded
> > > > resolution. To support this, every step of execution wo
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 02:24:41AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 25 September 2006 14:16, Brian Harring wrote:
> > Bad soname handling is just *part* of what BINCOMPAT could do; it's
> > not the sole reason for it's existance, as such it's not quite right
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 11:31:12PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday 23 September 2006 10:30, Brian Harring wrote:
> > dlopen?
>
> we already said that this will need a new depend variable
>
> > How does this fix openssl horkage? (bad soname handling)
>
>
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 10:34:03AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday 23 September 2006 10:24, Alin Nastac wrote:
> > I see only libraries in NEEDED and it is probably generated
> > automatically. There is no way for the automatic tools to discover the
> > dependency between pptpd and ppp v
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 09:50:12AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday 23 September 2006 09:14, Brian Harring wrote:
> > You're assuming that after the merge of the pkg that breaks
> > compatibility, building is actually _still_ possible for the depends.
>
> o
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 06:20:44AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 21 September 2006 11:08, Brian Harring wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 10:43:11AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > i'm referring to the specific file of course, not anything else in t
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 08:15:48PM +0300, Alin Nastac wrote:
> Brian Harring wrote:
> > BDEPEND was actually a seperate proposal/idea, intention there was to
> > have that be the deps that *must* be CHOST (gcc would be an example);
> > bits that are used to actually build
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 10:43:11AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 21 September 2006 10:04, Brian Harring wrote:
> > I agree; while I'm labeling it ABI, includes both bad soname handling
> > and seperate sonames.
>
> those people should be smacked (for the
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 05:38:08PM +0300, Alin Nastac wrote:
> Brian Harring wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 01:38:59PM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote:
> >
> > There is one flaw with this though; packages can provide both
> > libraries _and_ binaries. Our dependenc
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 09:52:27AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 21 September 2006 07:59, Brian Harring wrote:
> > Why have the explicit var? Because 0.9.7a through 0.9.7c may all be
> > compatible, but 0.9.7d isn't. If you force an automatic algo that
>
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 09:49:18AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 21 September 2006 09:34, Marius Mauch wrote:
> > Manifest2 records do not contain a MD5 checksum. The only guaranteed
> > checksum type there is SHA1. So once manifest1 is phased out the tree
> > will not contain MD5 chec
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 01:38:59PM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote:
> Alin Nastac wrote:
> >I reckon this could be solved by yet another *DEPEND variable. The only
> >atoms accepted by this variable would be "CATEGORY/PN". Every time when
> >a package gets updated from PV1 to PV2 (distinct versions, revi
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 03:36:07PM +0200, Krzysiek Pawlik wrote:
> Simon Stelling wrote:
> > I would like you to share your comments on the attached GLEP with me.
>
> I like the idea with one exception:
>
> > Licenses that need to be explicitly accepted before installation of a
> > package
> > (
On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 11:02:06PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 00:17:21 -0700 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 11:22:11PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> | > Protected locations are determined by the ``CONFIG_PROTEC
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 12:15:34AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:02:53 -0700 Chris White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | On Monday 11 September 2006 15:22, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> | > * Otherwise, try again with ``._cfg0001_name``, then
> | > ``._cfg0002_name`` and so on
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 11:22:11PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Protected locations are determined by the ``CONFIG_PROTECT`` environment
> variable, which is defined in the profiles and which may be augmented or
> overridden by the current environment and user configuration files.
The user env
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 10:34:52AM -0400, Aron Griffis wrote:
> From bind-9.3.2-r4.ebuild:
>
> # idea from dev-libs/cyrus-sasl
> if has distcc ${FEATURES}; then
> einfo "You have \"distcc\" enabled"
> einfo "build with MAKEOPTS=\"-j1\""
> jobs="-j1"
> else
>
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 10:37:21PM -0400, Stephen P. Becker wrote:
> Carsten Lohrke wrote:
> >On Sunday 03 September 2006 16:36, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> >>I am not adding stuff. I am fixing existing packages. And I am taking
> >>responsibility.
> >
> >How wonderful this sort of "maintenance" is y
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 09:31:56AM -0400, Michael Cummings wrote:
> Brian Harring wrote:
> > mail-filter/spamassassin: use.local.desc unused flag(s): extramodules,
> > pyzor, razor, spf
>
> me thinks there be a bug here - I've removed extramodules from
> use.local.d
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 10:29:11AM +, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
> Hola,
>
> I've been inspired by the local/global USE flag threads recently
> posted by Doug (Cardoe), and it got me to thinking... I've recently
> joined the pkgcore development effort, and was asked by Brian
> (ferringb) what I'd
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 02:33:14AM -0400, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> While I'm still awake...
>
> Here's a list of unused local USE flags that aren't used anymore and got
> axed.
> I stopped at USE flags that start with J...
Missed a few before j from the looks of it- attached is a list of
unused
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 03:53:02PM -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> Brian Harring wrote: [Mon Sep 04 2006, 01:04:21AM CDT]
> > > 49 (alt package manager 1) --> R (by council; sane API preferred)
> > > 50 (alt package manager 2) --> R (by council; sane API preferred)
>
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 10:53:44PM -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> I'm adding a new key, "M" for "moribund", that will identify GLEPs that
> have been accepted, but never implemented. If there's any sign of life
> in such a GLEP, I'll happily change the "M" back to an "A".
>
> Here's the changes t
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 09:54:09PM -0700, Daniel Ostrow wrote:
>
>
> > > I like this option better than sticking another file into the public
> > > tree that no user will ever need.
> >
> > Instead, modifying the eclass metadata and adding two new keys, that
> > users will never need is fine?
On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 01:37:26AM +0200, Danny van Dyk wrote:
> Am Freitag, 1. September 2006 19:37 schrieb Brian Harring:
> > > >
> > > > old new
> > > > - --
> > > > foo.eclass new-
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 06:57:22PM +0200, Danny van Dyk wrote:
> Am Freitag, 1. September 2006 17:05 schrieb Alec Warner:
> > Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Repoman needs to check for deprecated eclasses, see
> > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/141677
> > >
> > > As a result of the discussi
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 08:26:41AM -0400, Alec Warner wrote:
> "A project exists if it has a web page at www.g.o/proj/en/whatever that
> is maintained. ("Maintained" means that the information on the page is
> factually correct and not out-of-date.) If the webpage isn't maintained,
> it is presumed
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 09:14:24AM +0200, Michael Weyersh??user wrote:
> Abhay Kedia wrote:
> > Can someone suggest an appropriate alternate please?
>
> I don't know if it's appropriate since I never used alsaplayer, but
> mpeg123 is a good player for "Just play me this file on a console
> without
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 10:59:48PM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
> Brian Harring wrote:
> > Said single inheritance protection was added 06/05/06 (rev 3544),
> > stabled for x86 roughly 06/22/06.
> >
> > Hasn't even yet made it to a release media- meaning folk insta
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 01:24:49PM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Currently, portage only allows single inheritance in profiles, but
> it's easy to enable multiple inheritance. In order to do this, we
> only need to unconstrain the number of parents allowed in the parent
> file (o
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 09:23:34PM +0200, Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 00:22:50 -0700,
> Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > forcing cxx on via package.mask for gcc
> > sys-devel/gcc[-cxx]
>
> If i want to build a cxx-free sy
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 05:49:40PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 August 2006 15:18, Zac Medico wrote:
> > Stuart Herbert wrote:
> > > Any chance of per-package USE defaults support? That's much more useful
> > > to me.
> >
> > Attached to bug 61732 there's a patch that implements th
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 12:55:28PM +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> * Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> > On Tuesday 08 August 2006 09:56, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> > > If you want an dhcp client, install "dhcp-client", if you
> > > want an dhcp server, install "dhcp-server". Could it be simpl
Pardon the spam, but correcting a misstatement on my part-
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 09:41:39PM -0700, Brian Harring wrote:
> I know of selinux, and multilib- all that are effectively features,
> and exist in the use conditional namespace because they
> unfortunately straddle both (same i
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 11:11:59AM +0100, Roy Marples wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 August 2006 09:56, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> > If you want an dhcp client, install "dhcp-client", if you
> > want an dhcp server, install "dhcp-server". Could it be simpler ?
>
> Maybe you missed the part of the discussion
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 08:33:51AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 00:22:50 -0700 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 07:23:31AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> | > On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 21:41:39 -0700 Brian Harring <[EMAIL
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 07:23:31AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 21:41:39 -0700 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | > The use.force feature is complementary to use.mask. It's exactly
> | > the same concept, but inverted.
> |
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 09:57:39PM -0700, Ryan Tandy wrote:
> Peter Gordon wrote:
> >Zac Medico wrote:
> >>The difference with use.force is that it prevents flags, that are deemed
> >>extremely important, from being accidentally disabled by the user.
> >
> >If they were so "extremely important" the
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 08:31:55PM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > I read the portage-dev discussion, and I'm still not seeing how this is
> > superior to make.defaults.
>
> The difference with use.force is that it prevents flags, that are
> deemed extremely important, from
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 09:54:18AM +0200, Simon Stelling wrote:
> Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> >For example: mplayer
> >It has it's gui-less player and an gtk-based frontend in one package.
> >We should split this into two packages: mplayer and gmplayer.
> >The chances to get this done in the upstream *
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 10:27:04PM -0500, Lance Albertson wrote:
> Brian Harring wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 08:05:15PM +0200, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
>
> >> Local overlays are fine as the user exactly knows what he does in his
> >> private
> >>
d provide a perfect refresher of the definition).
> I'd appreciate, if you would try to have a controversial
> discussion, without starting to loose your manners.
And I'd appreciate a less condescending tone.
> On Wednesday 02 August 2006 03:39, Brian Harring wrote:
> &g
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 02:24:17AM +0200, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
> On Monday 31 July 2006 07:05, Seemant Kulleen wrote:
> > OK, let's start with: what exactly is the problem?
> 1) Please reread my replies in the first sunrise thread. Points are:
1) no security,
Suggest you read their responses, an
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 02:47:46PM +0200, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 12:19:28 +0100
> Stuart Herbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Just adding an alias
> > into a second category makes the tree more of a mess - not less.
>
> The alias, once setup, can be left alone forever. As
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 06:04:10PM +0200, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 01:05:20 -0700
> Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > >Unfortunately the category system is deeply embedded in portage
> > > >and the tree, so chan
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 08:44:35AM +0100, Stuart Herbert wrote:
> In fact, categories do not give us the complete ability to have two
> packages with the same upstream name in the tree ... because binary
> packages do not support category names at all.
B.
They do actually- the bintree *re
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 09:39:14PM +0200, Luca Longinotti wrote:
> John Jawed wrote:
> > Below is a link to an "enhanced input" eclass as well as a screenshot.
> > This eclass was made to simplify interacting with the user at
> > pkg_config().
>
> This is a good idea imo, it could really simplify
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 08:41:46PM +0200, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 00:37:47 -0700
> Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 09:05:03AM +0200, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> > > On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 17:15:38 +0100
> >
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 09:05:03AM +0200, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 17:15:38 +0100
> Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 08:57:32 +0200 "Kevin F. Quinn"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > | Things that package moves cause:
> > | 1) Dependencies th
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 04:31:52PM -0700, Tuan Van wrote:
> Jakub Moc wrote:
> > Ser Gio wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Why does x11-libs/gtk+-2.8.19 has the "X" useflag? The ebuild doesn't
> >> look like it's using it.
> >>
> >> thanks,
> >> Sérgio
> >
> > Because virtualx.eclass has it in IUSE and
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 02:24:49PM +0200, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 02:08 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> > On Friday 07 July 2006 01:54, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > > | No, we never spent years telling them not to use your so-called
> > > | "CFLAGS hacks" that are ra
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 10:04:08AM -0500, Lance Albertson wrote:
> Brian Harring wrote:
>
> >> don't see why we need to have a public system setup as long as we can
> >> provide the source when asked. As far as a I know, the GPL doesn't
> >> dicat
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 08:38:42AM -0500, Lance Albertson wrote:
> Brian Harring wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 09:00:29AM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 18:34 +0300, Marius Mauch wrote:
> >>> Patrick McLean schrieb:
> >>&g
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 09:00:29AM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 18:34 +0300, Marius Mauch wrote:
> > Patrick McLean schrieb:
> > > I have absolutely zero experience with catalyst, but couldn't it be made
> > > to create a source CD ISO when it is generating the binary one?
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 11:49:58AM +1000, Daniel wrote:
> On Sunday 11 June 2006 12:50, Brian Harring wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 05:08:23PM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 16:19 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > On Thursday 08
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 09:58:01PM +0100, Stephen Bennett wrote:
> Many things were discussed in the last round of this thread (Paludis
> and Profiles, in case anyone missed it), and many useful points raised.
> One of these, which seems to have been largely missed in amongst the
> other noise, for
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 05:08:23PM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 16:19 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Thursday 08 June 2006 21:08, Brian Harring wrote:
> > > One additional to this- the location for the file in the tree *should*
> > > be
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 08:16:32AM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 02:49 +0200, Markus Ullmann wrote:
> > > This is a bug for an ebuild that the user does not think is related to
> > > the pam_skey. Go back and read what I wrote.
> > >
> >
> > it was agreed upon that we do
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 02:54:08AM +0200, Ioannis Aslanidis wrote:
> On 6/9/06, Grant Goodyear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >So, what would people think of moving herds.xml from gentoo/misc into
> >the portage tree, with the rationale being that local tools could use
> >that information for various
Resurrecting this issue (yet another round) since FEATURES=debug-build
was shoved in...
Background info-
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/35202/focus=35212
Quick summary, there needs to be an easy way to flag on essentially
"leave the symbols intact/don't mangle the code too muc
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 11:14:45AM +0200, Harald van Dijk wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 01:54:08AM -0700, Brian Harring wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 10:19:41AM +0200, Harald van Dijk wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 03:45:50AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > &g
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 10:19:41AM +0200, Harald van Dijk wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 03:45:50AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Monday 05 June 2006 02:07, Harald van Dijk wrote:
> > > Some gnustep stuff inherits cvs, but uses -D in the cvs options to
> > > always download exactly the same t
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 03:00:13PM -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> Paul de Vrieze wrote: [Thu Jun 01 2006, 02:44:39PM CDT]
> > I would like the council to discuss GLEP 49 as has been discussed on
> > the list some weeks ago. It is about the package manager requirements.
>
> Incidentally, I drafted
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 09:14:01AM +0200, Danny van Dyk wrote:
> Hello Mike,
>
> Am Dienstag, 30. Mai 2006 05:29 schrieb Mike Kelly:
> > I'm Mike Kelly, one of the SoC-ers. I'll be working on GLEP 27 for
> > the summer. Right now I'm looking for some basic feedback on my
> > proposal.
> >
> > In p
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 06:24:31PM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 15:05 -0700, Brian Harring wrote:
> > On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 05:46:09PM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > > I completely understand this. However, in most cases the reason the
> &
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 05:46:09PM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> I completely understand this. However, in most cases the reason the
> older packages are still in the tree is because *somebody* doesn't have
> it stable yet.
Strictly stable, or unstable?
What about profiles, which to account
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 04:51:06PM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 16:22 -0400, Ned Ludd wrote:
> > And now per arch breakdowns.
> > http://gentooexperimental.org/~ferringb/reports/arch-vulnerabilities/
>
> No offense, but that isn't exactly useful in its current form. For
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 04:22:30PM -0400, Ned Ludd wrote:
> And now per arch breakdowns.
> http://gentooexperimental.org/~ferringb/reports/arch-vulnerabilities/
Couple more reports generated (in the parent dir, dropped keywords,
imlate, packages that have just ~arch, ebuild metadata verification,
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 11:54:25AM -0400, Stephen P. Becker wrote:
> > Am I missing something obvious?
> >
> > -g2boojum-
>
> Probably just the blatant Ciaran hate, and the realization that people
> will have to suck it up and deal with him if his package manager ever
> becomes official for Gento
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 02:59:03PM +0200, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> On Monday 22 May 2006 10:47, Thomas Cort wrote:
> > I definitely agree that Gentoo needs a team of people to deal with the
> > primary package manager, it is one of the most important tools in a
> > Linux system. It is especially imp
No need to cc, I'm on the ml (realize the norm is to cc, but no point
in spamming me twice ;)
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 10:25:12PM -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 11:02:22PM -0400, Ned Ludd wrote:
> > ferringb took the time to write a parser and setup a cronjob
> > (every
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 12:10:40PM +0900, Georgi Georgiev wrote:
> Just two points:
>
> - standards should not be set by the primary package manager
> - the primary package manager does not have to be developed by Gentoo.
>
> More about it below:
>
> maillog: 20/05/2006-14:54:18(+0200): Paul de
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 09:58:02PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 18 May 2006 22:39:20 +0200 Paul de Vrieze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> | > | What he is driving it at is that either paludis is an alternative
> | > | (yet on disk compatible) primary, or it's a secondary- you keep
> | > | debating
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 07:33:27PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 18 May 2006 20:18:24 +0200 Paul de Vrieze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | > * An alternative to Portage.
> | >
> | > Paludis itself is distribution agnostic. It can be used on a Gentoo
> | > system or on a non-Gentoo system
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 08:04:36PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 18 May 2006 11:51:16 -0700 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 07:34:16PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> | > On Thu, 18 May 2006 20:20:29 +0200 Carsten Loh
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 07:34:16PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 18 May 2006 20:20:29 +0200 Carsten Lohrke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | On Thursday 18 May 2006 20:02, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> | >It's kinda like this:
> |
> | Stop making such odd and wrong comparisons. The package man
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 08:50:32PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 17 May 2006 12:06:09 -0700 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | Clarify on virtuals please. Unless you're mangling the data for
> | sym/dir, that's an unmerge time decisio
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 07:44:16PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 17 May 2006 11:13:09 -0700 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | > Paludis can read a Portage-generated VDB. Portage can't read a
> | > Paludis-generated VDB, because Paludis has
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 05:32:38PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 17 May 2006 11:23:19 +0200 Wernfried Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | We really should figure that stuff out before we start integrating an
> | externally written package manager we have no influence on whatsoever
>
>
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 04:26:28PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 17 May 2006 17:11:04 +0200 Paul de Vrieze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | Let me clarify my statement. I don't care about candy spinners.
> | Paludis (or any other package manager that is to be integrated into
> | gentoo) s
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 02:57:05PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 17 May 2006 12:04:33 +0200 Paul de Vrieze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | - Paludis must be able to handle a standard portage /var/db/pkg tree.
> | This means that paludis can read it, and write it. Enabling mixing
> | port
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 12:11:34PM +0100, Stephen Bennett wrote:
> On Wed, 17 May 2006 12:14:37 +0200
> Paul de Vrieze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Using the normal profiles would also establish paludis as a possible
> > replacement of portage as primary package manager. Refraining from
> > d
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 03:56:38PM -0700, Brian Harring wrote:
> If your parent parsing implementation handled N parents on a single
> line (rather then parent per line as you do now), portage would
> explode rather then silently use the left most. Your implementation
> isn&
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 07:07:05PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Tue, 16 May 2006 10:33:56 -0700 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | > What eapi=0 standard? We emulate Portage internals where it's found
> | > to be necessary, and don't otherwise.
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 06:28:41PM +0100, Stephen Bennett wrote:
> Brian Harring wrote:
> >The gain of the profile is that you can do a few new tricks for folks
> >doing boostrapping experiments- why not just introduce an ebuild that
> >sets up the new profile in a temp
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 05:47:42PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Tue, 16 May 2006 09:16:18 -0700 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | 1) changes to the eapi=0 ebuild standard; renaming of vars
> | (PORTAGE_* -> PALUDIS_* namely)
>
> What eapi=0 s
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 04:15:49PM +0100, Stephen Bennett wrote:
> If noone has any strong reasonable objections, I'd like to add a
> Paludis profile to the tree. This would use Paludis as the default
> provider for virtual/portage (which is a less than ideal name, but that
> is another discussion
Hola all-
Well looky here, we've got another new portage dev to report- Zac
Medico (zmedico). Areas of focus thus far are general stable work,
and work on the rewrite (you can thank him and marienz for the test
framework work).
Additionally, Zac is the maintainer of two external projects-
htt
Hola all-
We've got a new portage dev; Alec Warner, aka antarus- aside from
doc work, he'll be doing repoman work and the usual random bug
squashing.
His words-
I work at The Division of Engineering Computing Services at Michigan
State University. I serve primarily as an undergraduate web
de
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 06:06:02PM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 January 2006 17:43, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > Jason Stubbs wrote:
> > > I'm not exactly sure what you mean by "broken" in the first paragraph nor
> > > how a check can help with unmaintained (=no commits, no?) package
401 - 500 of 735 matches
Mail list logo
