Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: eudev project announcement

Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote: On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 09:29:26AM -0500, Richard Yao wrote: As I said in an earlier email, Lennart Poettering claims that it does not work. We are discussing some of the things necessary to make it work. Just to repeat: In this thread it was claimed that a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: eudev project announcement

On Mon, December 17, 2012 22:31, Greg KH wrote: On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 09:03:40PM +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote: Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote: On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 09:29:26AM -0500, Richard Yao wrote: As I said in an earlier email, Lennart Poettering claims that it does not work. We

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: eudev project announcement

On Wednesday, December 19, 2012 09:13:28 AM Greg KH wrote: On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 08:21:36AM +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote: On Mon, December 17, 2012 22:31, Greg KH wrote: On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 09:03:40PM +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote: Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote: On Mon, Dec 17

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: eudev project announcement

On Thursday, December 20, 2012 09:31:36 AM Michał Górny wrote: On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 00:27:26 +0100 J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote: On Wednesday, December 19, 2012 09:13:28 AM Greg KH wrote: On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 08:21:36AM +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote: On Mon, December 17, 2012

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: eudev project announcement

On Thursday, December 20, 2012 07:02:06 AM Rich Freeman wrote: On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 6:21 AM, Richard Yao r...@gentoo.org wrote: No one has proposed moving everything to /usr. At the minimum, we would still have /etc and /var in /, as well as various mountpoints. If we do move those to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: eudev project announcement

On Friday, December 21, 2012 09:57:25 AM Michał Górny wrote: On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 09:10:22 +0100 J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote: On Thursday, December 20, 2012 09:31:36 AM Michał Górny wrote: On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 00:27:26 +0100 J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: eudev project announcement

On Friday, December 21, 2012 12:02:34 PM Michał Górny wrote: On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 11:24:45 +0100 J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote: On Friday, December 21, 2012 09:57:25 AM Michał Górny wrote: Just let me know when you have to maintain a lot of such systemd and upgrade, say, glibc

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: eudev project announcement

On Friday, December 21, 2012 12:42:23 PM Michał Górny wrote: On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 12:31:28 +0100 J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote: On Friday, December 21, 2012 12:02:34 PM Michał Górny wrote: On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 11:24:45 +0100 J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: eudev project announcement

On Friday, December 21, 2012 08:51:09 AM Ian Stakenvicius wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 21/12/12 03:10 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote: An init* needs to be kept in sync with the rest of the system as well. Just to be clear, by init* you mean {initrd,initramfs

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: eudev project announcement

On Friday, December 21, 2012 08:52:00 AM Dale wrote: J. Roeleveld wrote: On Friday, December 21, 2012 08:51:09 AM Ian Stakenvicius wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 21/12/12 03:10 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote: An init* needs to be kept in sync with the rest

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: eudev project announcement

On Friday, December 21, 2012 09:38:36 AM Rich Freeman wrote: On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote: On 21/12/12 03:10 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote: An init* needs to be kept in sync with the rest of the system as well. Just to be clear, by init* you mean

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: eudev project announcement

Stelian Ionescu sione...@cddr.org wrote: On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 12:48 +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote: On Friday, December 21, 2012 12:42:23 PM Michał Górny wrote: On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 12:31:28 +0100 J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote: On Friday, December 21, 2012 12:02:34 PM Michał Górny

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: eudev project announcement

Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote: J. Roeleveld wrote: However, it is, in my opinion, a workaround for a problem that has been forced upon me. As soon as eudev is stable enough, I will dump udev. [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/441004 Strange, I use a current-stable version of genkernel, /usr

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: eudev project announcement

On Friday, December 21, 2012 12:20:45 PM William Hubbs wrote: On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 06:36:05PM +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote: On Friday, December 21, 2012 10:21:02 AM William Hubbs wrote: On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 04:04:31PM +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote: On Friday, December 21, 2012 09:38:36 AM

Re: [gentoo-dev] Half of the firmware packages in tree install to wrong directory

Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote: On Fri, 8 Feb 2013, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: 2013/2/8 Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu: I would say that we might want to review linux-firmware, and if the newest firmware _is_ there, just get rid of the split one. That should be probably the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Half of the firmware packages in tree install to wrong directory

Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: On 09/02/13 11:11, J. Roeleveld wrote: Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote: On Fri, 8 Feb 2013, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: 2013/2/8 Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu: I would say that we might want to review linux-firmware, and if the newest

Re: Graveyard overlay (was: Re: [gentoo-dev] last rites: games-strategy/x2, games-strategy/x2-demo)

On Thursday 14 February 2013 08:53:45 Florian Philipp wrote: Am 14.02.2013 08:26, schrieb Michael Weber: On 02/14/2013 06:09 AM, Ben de Groot wrote: I need two things: 1. Users volunteering some time to keep this running 2. Agreement on a place to host tarballs no longer hosted

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Making systemd more accessible to normal users

Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote: Am Sonntag, 19. Mai 2013, 14:59:21 schrieb Michael Mol: On 05/18/2013 03:23 PM, Carlos Silva wrote: Is the real problem just the god damn unit/init files?! Damn, who cares about 2KiB files in the age of GiBs?! You can install 1000 of them that

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Making systemd more accessible to normal users

(Late reply due to busy week, just want to clarify a small detail) On Sun, May 19, 2013 16:34, Peter Stuge wrote: J. Roeleveld wrote: I don't see how this will avoid the issue of a limited amount of inodes. That is what I usually run out of before the disk is full when storing lots

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Making systemd more accessible to normal users

On Tue, May 21, 2013 09:03, Alan McKinnon wrote: I don't like gnu info files. Neither me nor anyone I know can figure out how to drive info. This reminded me of my experience with info-files. Don't know how long ago it was that I used them as I find google to be a much more useful resource.

Re: [gentoo-dev] eselect init

On Sat, May 25, 2013 15:38, Tom Wijsman wrote: On Sat, 25 May 2013 11:54:48 +0200 Luca Barbato lu_z...@gentoo.org wrote: SNIPPED there's one option we forget about here though, EFI users can build a second smaller minimally adjusted defconfig kernel that ends up loading the default init

Re: [gentoo-dev] eselect init

On Sat, May 25, 2013 21:55, Tom Wijsman wrote: On Sat, 25 May 2013 21:09:47 +0200 J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote: How will the stop/start part of services/init-scripts/... be done? Not sure what you mean here; if you keep init function the same as the init you boot with, this should

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: UPower upstream (git master) and 0.99 release - No sys-power/pm-utils support anymore

On Saturday, May 31, 2014 02:17:32 PM Samuli Suominen wrote: On 31/05/14 05:47, Steven J. Long wrote: On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 09:57:01AM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: On 27/05/14 08:34, Michał Górny wrote: Dnia 2014-05-26, o godz. 23:15:34 Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: UPower upstream (git master) and 0.99 release - No sys-power/pm-utils support anymore

On Tuesday, June 03, 2014 04:46:18 PM Samuli Suominen wrote: On 03/06/14 16:40, Tom Wijsman wrote: On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 16:28:47 +0300 Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: On 03/06/14 16:20, Tom Wijsman wrote: Ehm, no, version 0.9.23-r3 controls that with a systemd USE flag;

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: UPower upstream (git master) and 0.99 release - No sys-power/pm-utils support anymore

On Tuesday, June 03, 2014 04:45:36 PM Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: Samuli Suominen schrieb: On 03/06/14 16:53, Rich Freeman wrote: So, I get why you did it, but my concern is that when you tell portage that non-systemd users shouldn't use this package, portage helpfully solves that

[gentoo-dev] Help needed with ebuilds for pear.horde.org

Hi All, I am trying to create an ebuild for Egroupware 14.1. (released this month) To find out the dependencies, I am going through the setup check and am stuck with the following: ** Checking PEAR pear.horde.org/Horde_Imap_Client (2.16.0) is installed: False PEAR::Horde_Imap_Client is needed

Re: [gentoo-dev] systemd profiles

On Friday, August 29, 2014 10:41:51 PM Rich Freeman wrote: On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Jauhien Piatlicki jauh...@gentoo.org wrote: Hi all, I have a simple question: why do we have systemd subprofiles only in gnome and kde profiles? Could we add systemd subprofiles also to

Re: [gentoo-dev] systemd profiles

On Saturday, August 30, 2014 01:41:26 PM Michał Górny wrote: Dnia 2014-08-30, o godz. 13:27:08 J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org napisał(a): On Friday, August 29, 2014 10:41:51 PM Rich Freeman wrote: On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Jauhien Piatlicki jauh...@gentoo.org wrote: Hi

Re: [gentoo-dev] maintainer-needed@ packages need you!

On Saturday, August 30, 2014 01:46:20 PM Michał Górny wrote: Hello, Right now, we have 1262 packages assigned to maintainer-needed@. Only a few of them have a large number of bugs, many have just version bump requests. 953 packages have no bug open. Please consider adopting some of the

Re: [gentoo-dev] maintainer-needed@ packages need you!

On Saturday, August 30, 2014 04:51:35 PM Michał Górny wrote: Dnia 2014-08-30, o godz. 14:35:20 J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org napisał(a): On Saturday, August 30, 2014 01:46:20 PM Michał Górny wrote: Hello, Right now, we have 1262 packages assigned to maintainer-needed@. Only

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: maintainer-needed@ packages need you!

On Sunday, September 07, 2014 01:16:57 AM Andrew Savchenko wrote: Hello, On Mon, 01 Sep 2014 07:15:53 +0800 Patrick Lauer wrote: On Sunday 31 August 2014 11:39:22 hasufell wrote: Martin Vaeth: hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote: On 08/30/2014 02:35 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote

OT - My last one to this thread - Skype + Tox - Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: maintainer-needed@ packages need you!

On Tuesday, September 09, 2014 08:59:41 PM Andrew Savchenko wrote: My last response to this, as it is getting too OT Hello, On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 17:51:46 +0200 J. Roeleveld wrote: It probably works, provided all your contacts also use it. As long as the vast majority of my contacts use

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: trimming the @system set [was: adding sys-apps/iproute2 to the @system set]

On Sunday, September 07, 2014 05:57:57 PM Joshua Kinard wrote: On 09/07/2014 17:04, Rich Freeman wrote: On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Joshua Kinard ku...@gentoo.org wrote: snipped As for Parallel builds, do you make make -jX? Or running concurrent emerges in different shells? I

Re: [gentoo-dev] Anti-spam changes: proposal to drop spammy mail

On 11 May 2015 15:59:40 CEST, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 9:37 AM, C Bergström cbergst...@pathscale.com wrote: Sorry to shoot and run, but I think you're trying to tackle this problem in the wrong way. The problem isn't to drop the mail. The solution is to

Re: [gentoo-dev] news item: OpenRC 0.18 changes to localmount and netmount

On Tuesday, September 29, 2015 04:52:51 PM Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 29/09/2015 16:29, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > > On 28/09/15 06:58 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > >> Also, we are dropping the use of the -O switch for mount/umount > >> -a. This is being dropped because it is util-linux specific and >

Re: [gentoo-dev] news item: OpenRC 0.18 changes to localmount and netmount

On 1 October 2015 17:49:15 CEST, Mike Gilbert wrote: >On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Ian Stakenvicius >wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >> On 01/10/15 09:41 AM, William Hubbs wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 11:13:09AM

Re: [gentoo-dev] news item: OpenRC 0.18 changes to localmount and netmount

On 1 October 2015 17:49:15 CEST, Mike Gilbert wrote: >On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Ian Stakenvicius >wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >> On 01/10/15 09:41 AM, William Hubbs wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 11:13:09AM

Re: [gentoo-dev] usr merge

On Saturday, April 09, 2016 05:15:08 PM James Le Cuirot wrote: > On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 12:09:38 -0400 > > waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote: > > > I never really got the mentality that using an initramfs is a > > > burden. > > > > > One more piece of software that can go wrong. You have to > > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] usr merge

On Saturday, April 09, 2016 09:07:46 PM Rich Freeman wrote: > On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 8:09 PM, J. Roeleveld <jo...@antarean.org> wrote: > > I actually write my own initramfs because neither dracut not genkernel end > > up with a convenient boot system. > > > > I ha

Re: [gentoo-dev] usr merge

On Monday, April 11, 2016 01:10:15 AM Raymond Jennings wrote: > Please don't do this. I want my system left alone. Please don't top-post, I want to have a logical flow of the text. > On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 11:41 PM, J. Roeleveld <jo...@antarean.org> wrote: > > On Sunday, Ap

Re: [gentoo-dev] usr merge

On Sunday, April 10, 2016 10:04:42 AM James Le Cuirot wrote: > On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 02:09:35 +0200 > > "J. Roeleveld" <jo...@antarean.org> wrote: > > I actually write my own initramfs because neither dracut not > > genkernel end up with a convenient boot

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-apps/egroupware

On Thursday, June 30, 2016 10:30:07 PM Aaron Bauman wrote: > # Aaron Bauman (30 Jun 2016) > # Unpatched security vulnerability per bug #509920. > # Removal in 30 days > www-apps/egroupware Why is this bug being used to treeclean egroupware? Why is bug 461212 not being used to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: www-apps/egroupware

On Thursday, July 07, 2016 06:37:09 AM Duncan wrote: > J. Roeleveld posted on Wed, 06 Jul 2016 20:22:57 +0200 as excerpted: > > On Thursday, June 30, 2016 10:30:07 PM Aaron Bauman wrote: > >> # Aaron Bauman <b...@gentoo.org> (30 Jun 2016) > >> # Unpatched secur

Re: [gentoo-dev] why is the security team running around p.masking packages

On Wednesday, July 06, 2016 11:13:55 PM Andrew Savchenko wrote: > On Wed, 06 Jul 2016 20:23:46 +0900 Aaron Bauman wrote: . > Please understand me correctly: I'm not blaming you or security > team for this or that issue. But it looks like security team indeed > needs to review some policies

Re: [gentoo-dev] Help wanted with www-client/chromium

On Tuesday, December 13, 2016 06:00:25 PM Mike Gilbert wrote: > Keeping up with the frequent Chromium releases is quite a chore. > Recently, phajdan.jr has been slacking on the masked dev channel > updates due a hardware problem, so I have been spending additional > time on them. > > If there are

Re: [gentoo-dev] Help wanted with www-client/chromium

On December 14, 2016 2:40:45 PM GMT+01:00, Andrey Utkin wrote: >On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 06:00:25PM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> Keeping up with the frequent Chromium releases is quite a chore. >> Recently, phajdan.jr has been slacking on the masked dev channel >>