Re: [gentoo-dev] package.mask-ed ebuilds

2010-04-09 Thread Michał Górny
it can become. If it just misses some polishes, it's acceptable -- as long as you're going to maintain it and fix all the known issues ASAP. Please notice that this is no official statement but only my personal opinion on the topic. -- Best regards, Michał Górny http://mgorny.alt.pl xmpp:mgo

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] RESTRICT=parallel for builds that can't be executed in parallel

2010-04-13 Thread Michał Górny
. But this, of course, would require a quite good solution for maintaining the lock and dropping it whenever build process is aborted/killed. -- Best regards, Michał Górny http://mgorny.alt.pl xmpp:mgo...@jabber.ru

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] RESTRICT=parallel for builds that can't be executed in parallel

2010-04-14 Thread Michał Górny
needs to be user-overridable. Else, we'll end up someday like Windows, forcing user to reboot the system and perform the merge on a dedicated runlevel. -- Best regards, Michał Górny http://mgorny.alt.pl xmpp:mgo...@jabber.ru signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Multiple emerges in parallel (was: [RFC] RESTRICT=parallel for builds that can't be executed in parallel)

2010-04-14 Thread Michał Górny
its ${WORKDIR} to force failure. -- Best regards, Michał Górny http://mgorny.alt.pl xmpp:mgo...@jabber.ru signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Multiple emerges in parallel (was: [RFC] RESTRICT=parallel for builds that can't be executed in parallel)

2010-04-14 Thread Michał Górny
-- or even aborting it before it is started (i.e. before it unpacks a load of files into ${PORTAGE_TMPDIR} without sufficient space). -- Best regards, Michał Górny http://mgorny.alt.pl xmpp:mgo...@jabber.ru signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] The /etc/portage/env profile.bashrc hack

2010-04-24 Thread Michał Górny
release supporting the feature (or upgrade his Portage version, if the removal is going to happen after the related rc-release) or implement it /etc/portage/bashrc-side. [1] http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/profiles/base/profile.bashrc?view=markup -- Best regards, Michał Górny http

[gentoo-dev] A policy to support random superuser account names

2010-04-30 Thread Michał Górny
that the numeric UID/GID should be always used for referencing the superuser account as they are fixed unlike the names. [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=315779 -- Best regards, Michał Górny http://mgorny.alt.pl xmpp:mgo...@jabber.ru signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] A policy to support random superuser account names

2010-05-03 Thread Michał Górny
use these variables (chown, find, install) support both numerical UIDs and usernames passed in the same way. -- Best regards, Michał Górny http://mgorny.alt.pl xmpp:mgo...@jabber.ru signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] showing file diffs as root

2010-05-30 Thread Michał Górny
, Michał Górny http://mgorny.alt.pl xmpp:mgo...@jabber.ru -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkwCjW0ACgkQnGSe5QXeB7uojwCg5bXcUVGR487tyuU+wnNDG5fA JMkAoKiqCHJXsmQz7aYGU+J+BzTPwQsn =lRtw -END PGP SIGNATURE-

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] toolchain-funcs.eclass: functions to call compiler

2010-05-31 Thread Michał Górny
to the calling syntax I used there, and I'm open to hear better ideas. I've decided to pass all additional arguments (flags) through environmental variables to allow user to intuitively supply long input file lists. -- Best regards, Michał Górny http://mgorny.alt.pl xmpp:mgo...@jabber.ru --- /usr/portage

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] toolchain-funcs.eclass: functions to call compiler

2010-06-02 Thread Michał Górny
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 03:16:12 -0400 Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: On Monday, May 31, 2010 15:12:46 Michał Górny wrote: There are many simple applications which come without neither a sophisticated build system or even a tiny Makefile. In some cases, such applications aren't even

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] toolchain-funcs.eclass: functions to call compiler

2010-06-05 Thread Michał Górny
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 17:56:38 -0400 Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wednesday, June 02, 2010 09:17:00 Michał Górny wrote: On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 03:16:12 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: use emake then and leverage make's implicit rules. The implicit make rules are less universal

Re: [gentoo-dev] Actions of python team, especially Arfrever wrt python eclass and python-3*

2010-06-06 Thread Michał Górny
dependant packages, and here it goes. -- Best regards, Michał Górny http://mgorny.alt.pl xmpp:mgo...@jabber.ru signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] toolchain-funcs.eclass: functions to call compiler

2010-06-06 Thread Michał Górny
of that within a single 'emake' call. -- Best regards, Michał Górny http://mgorny.alt.pl xmpp:mgo...@jabber.ru signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] app-editors/vim and USE=vim-with-x - Rename to USE=X?

2010-06-08 Thread Michał Górny
particular features. Additionally, user should be able then to explicitly disable loading particular libraries if they would cause segfaults or other problems afterwards. -- Best regards, Michał Górny http://mgorny.alt.pl xmpp:mgo...@jabber.ru signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] toolchain-funcs.eclass: functions to call compiler

2010-06-08 Thread Michał Górny
On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 18:44:55 -0400 Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sunday, June 06, 2010 03:45:51 Michał Górny wrote: Well, I've already covered one corner case myself, which is the zpaq ebuild. I would approve a comment on my idea here: http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/sunrise

[gentoo-dev] Moving unmaintained packages to Sunrise

2010-06-13 Thread Michał Górny
to their own overlay or abandon, users are advised to add 'sunrise' to their repository list and use the user-maintained ebuild. And then the move is almost transparent to current Sunrise users. -- Best regards, Michał Górny http://mgorny.alt.pl xmpp:mgo...@jabber.ru signature.asc Description: PGP

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Moving unmaintained packages to Sunrise

2010-06-13 Thread Michał Górny
. It even uses an alternate build system, allows to fine-tune the build like not many packages do. Do you consider that an 'abandoned ebuild'? -- Best regards, Michał Górny http://mgorny.alt.pl xmpp:mgo...@jabber.ru signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] New global USE flag: introspection

2010-06-21 Thread Michał Górny
and required by most users, so it will be enabled by default for all ebuilds. Won't it be better to enable it by default only in 'gnome' subprofile? I don't see a use for it elsewhere. -- Best regards, Michał Górny http://mgorny.alt.pl xmpp:mgo...@jabber.ru signature.asc Description: PGP

Re: [gentoo-dev] Six month major project on Gentoo

2011-12-18 Thread Michał Górny
upstream bash would be interested in converting bash into C++. I wouldn't be interested in running such a bash, for instance. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: deprecate /usr/share/doc/$PF

2011-12-18 Thread Michał Górny
EAPIs is adding new-style dodoc/dohtml analogues to an eclass. I think some of devs agree we should be allowed to fix past mistakes without waiting another 20 years till the tree is migrated to a new EAPI... -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: deprecate /usr/share/doc/$PF

2011-12-19 Thread Michał Górny
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 00:07:45 +0100 Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote: El dom, 18-12-2011 a las 23:02 +0100, Michał Górny escribió: [...] Q6: Why can't the dodoc/dohtml path be changed before EAPI-5? A6: Because the path where dodoc and dohtml install files is part of the PMS. Portage

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: deprecate /usr/share/doc/$PF

2011-12-19 Thread Michał Górny
, the most correct approach would be to have PM handle docmoves as well. But -- on the other hand -- there will be always some hardwired paths which will be updated only on real package rebuild... -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Six month major project on Gentoo

2011-12-22 Thread Michał Górny
to point out that (if there is enough memory) recent kernels manage much better parallelism, even excess of it, once reached the maximum load augmenting threads only bring minimal loss of real time. Does that include handling complete lack of memory and heavy swapping? -- Best regards, Michał

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH git-2.eclass 1/2] Clean up non-bare checkout before updating.

2011-12-23 Thread Michał Górny
Fixes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395247 --- eclass/git-2.eclass |2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/git-2.eclass b/eclass/git-2.eclass index f1ed79f..4f0b65b 100644 --- a/eclass/git-2.eclass +++ b/eclass/git-2.eclass @@ -344,6 +344,8 @@

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH git-2.eclass 2/2] When constructing storedir, strip trailing '/.git' directory.

2011-12-23 Thread Michał Górny
Fixes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386845 --- eclass/git-2.eclass |3 ++- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/git-2.eclass b/eclass/git-2.eclass index 4f0b65b..44e3476 100644 --- a/eclass/git-2.eclass +++ b/eclass/git-2.eclass @@ -278,7 +278,8 @@

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH git-2.eclass 1/2] Clean up non-bare checkout before updating.

2011-12-23 Thread Michał Górny
On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 22:09:26 +0100 Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote: On Fri, 23 Dec 2011, Michał Górny wrote: Fixes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395247 + git clean -d -f -x || die ${FUNCNAME}: failed to clean checkout dir + Why should there be untracked

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH autotools-utils] Support autoreconfiguring packages.

2011-12-29 Thread Michał Górny
Please note that this is an early sketch. It surely can be improved, especially with some help on autotools.eclass side which is currently really hard to co-operate with. It works very similarly to gnome-autogen.sh. This means that it automatically determines all the tools needed to run,

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: news item for app-backup/bacula

2011-12-30 Thread Michał Górny
of Bacula. ^ (probably) the 4. Run the appropriate upgrade script from /usr/libexec/bacula/updatedb/. 7. Start the new Bacula. It saved us two steps! -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: news item for app-backup/bacula

2011-12-30 Thread Michał Górny
On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 10:43:31 +0100 Thomas Beierlein tom...@gentoo.org wrote: 4. Run the appropriate upgrade script from /usr/libexec/bacula/updatedb/. 7. Start the new Bacula. You still miss steps 5 and 6 ;P. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr

2012-01-01 Thread Michał Górny
on IUSE. For the latter, it may be simpler to use '[install-to-usr=]' kind of dependencies. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr

2012-01-01 Thread Michał Górny
├── init ├── lib64 │   ├── klibc-MZ_9MGQEe6NFqmrPjRpy5i6WlV8.so │   └── libc.so - klibc-MZ_9MGQEe6NFqmrPjRpy5i6WlV8.so ├── newroot └── proc $ du -sh 176K. -- Best regards, Michał Górny init Description: Binary data signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr

2012-01-02 Thread Michał Górny
it. I believe dracut builds static binaries, so it mainly needs updating when you build a new kernel. AFAIK dracut doesn't build anything. It just copies files from the running system. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr

2012-01-02 Thread Michał Górny
, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr

2012-01-03 Thread Michał Górny
and they /deliberately/ placed or used some programs in /usr/bin instead /bin and requiring that /usr bee in the root partition. Please, explain to me, how did they do it? As far as I am aware, autotools installs files where it is told to. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr

2012-01-03 Thread Michał Górny
if anyone's interested. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr

2012-01-04 Thread Michał Górny
On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 13:06:11 +0100 Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote: Michał Górny schrieb: On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 01:47:38 +0100 Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote: 2. switching from udev to mdev (avoids required /usr of udev) 3. some wrapper script to mount /usr before udev starts

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr

2012-01-04 Thread Michał Górny
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 15:54:07 + Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote: On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 16:51:12 +0100 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: /bin/systemctl libdbus-1.so.3 = /usr/lib64/libdbus-1.so.3 Considering that I really thought about stripping that one because

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr

2012-01-04 Thread Michał Górny
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 17:33:15 +0100 Fabian Groffen grob...@gentoo.org wrote: On 04-01-2012 16:37:34 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: And this part was not about the movement to /usr at all, so why do you suggest another movement here? And while you answer that, please also tell us, why you want

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr

2012-01-04 Thread Michał Górny
On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 07:27:49 +1300 Kent Fredric kentfred...@gmail.com wrote: 2012/1/5 Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org On Wed, 4 Jan 2012, Michał Górny wrote: There's really nothing pointless or blurry about this separation. The FHS has a nice definition: The contents of the root

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr

2012-01-04 Thread Michał Górny
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 18:12:18 +0100 Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wed, 4 Jan 2012, Michał Górny wrote: What mistakes? The mistake of introducing a pointless separation based on a rule of thumb which becomes more and more blurry over time, and hacking packages just to make

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr

2012-01-04 Thread Michał Górny
of static and shared libraries. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr

2012-01-04 Thread Michał Górny
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 20:00:51 +0100 Fabian Groffen grob...@gentoo.org wrote: On 04-01-2012 19:50:24 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 18:12:18 +0100 Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wed, 4 Jan 2012, Michał Górny wrote: What mistakes? The mistake

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr

2012-01-05 Thread Michał Górny
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 19:30:07 +0100 Marc Schiffbauer msch...@gentoo.org wrote: * Olivier Crête schrieb am 04.01.12 um 18:40 Uhr: On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 15:54 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 16:51:12 +0100 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: /bin/systemctl

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr

2012-01-05 Thread Michał Górny
wanting to keep it that way, being able to use init=/bin/sh on the kernel command line itself, from grub or whatever. [...] That's low level. Looking at your definition of 'low level', it seems that OpenRC is high level as well. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr

2012-01-05 Thread Michał Górny
, simplicity, well defined behaviour, understandability and stability in order to implement questionable new shiny things. Are you talking about the /usr move, systemd or udev now? Or just throwing random nouns to prove some random point? -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP

[gentoo-dev] RFC: news item for sys-apps/systemd - /usr migration

2012-01-05 Thread Michał Górny
Hello, I'm going to move systemd completely to /usr soonish and thus I'd like to submit the following news item for review. I'd appreciate any comments and suggestions. -- NEWS ITEM FOLLOWS -- Title: systemd /usr migration Author: Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain Posted

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr

2012-01-06 Thread Michał Górny
up your rootfs. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr

2012-01-06 Thread Michał Górny
directories in the filesystem. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH autotools-utils 1/4] Support installing default docs, similarly to EAPI4.

2012-01-06 Thread Michał Górny
Fixes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397659 --- eclass/autotools-utils.eclass |9 + 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/autotools-utils.eclass b/eclass/autotools-utils.eclass index f2daa55..e5ce908 100644 --- a/eclass/autotools-utils.eclass

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH autotools-utils 2/4] Pass --docdir to configure, and install docs from it.

2012-01-06 Thread Michał Górny
As EAPI 2 support is intended, this requires configuring the build system to install docs into a temporary location and moving files from it. Due to the lack of 'dodoc -r', directories inside docdir are supported only with EAPI 4. Fixes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=350423 ---

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH autotools-utils 3/4] Disallow eautomake from calling eautoreconf unnecessarily.

2012-01-06 Thread Michał Górny
As we're running the complete set of commands for autoreconf, it is completely unnecessary for eautomake to conditionally run that. Thus, we need to set FROM_EAUTORECONF. --- eclass/autotools-utils.eclass |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH autotools-utils 4/4] Autoreconfigure packages when user patches need it.

2012-01-06 Thread Michał Górny
If (user) patches modify either configure.{ac,in} or Makefile.am files, autoreconfigure the package for user. --- eclass/autotools-utils.eclass | 16 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/autotools-utils.eclass b/eclass/autotools-utils.eclass

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr

2012-01-07 Thread Michał Górny
that as the root if something goes wrong with your real root. And busybox again. Busybox is awfully big even when all useless tools are disabled. klibc is the way to go if initramfs is not supposed to be completely functional. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr

2012-01-07 Thread Michał Górny
useful when everybody actually has identical machines. Also, there's '-mtune' switch in gcc. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH autotools-utils 1/4] Support installing default docs, similarly to EAPI4.

2012-01-07 Thread Michał Górny
On Sat, 7 Jan 2012 00:15:50 +0100 Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote: On Fri, 6 Jan 2012, Michał Górny wrote: if [[ ${DOCS} ]]; then dodoc ${DOCS[@]} || die dodoc failed + else + local f + # same list as in PMS + for f in README

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH autotools-utils 1/4] Support installing default docs, similarly to EAPI4.

2012-01-07 Thread Michał Górny
On Sat, 7 Jan 2012 11:05:09 +0100 Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sat, 7 Jan 2012, Michał Górny wrote: Why only similarly to EAPI 4 and not identical with it? The latter would follow the principle of least surprise. Well, the defaults are identical. And DOCS as non-array

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr

2012-01-08 Thread Michał Górny
of static linkage, this is definitely not insanity. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH autotools-utils] Pass --docdir to configure, and install docs from it.

2012-01-08 Thread Michał Górny
As EAPI 2 support is intended, this requires configuring the build system to install docs into a temporary location and moving files from it. Due to the lack of 'dodoc -r', directories inside docdir are supported only with EAPI 4. Fixes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=350423 ---

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr

2012-01-09 Thread Michał Górny
the freedom of having a clean rootfs and system free of random static executables needed to mount /usr with random filesystems. Static linking is IMHO worse than making _initramfs_ mandatory. Or maybe do you have method to force rebuilds of packages dependant on static libraries? -- Best regards, Michał

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr

2012-01-10 Thread Michał Górny
then put more work just to ensure that admin doesn't have to waste 15 minutes to recompile the kernel (if necessary), create an initramfs and add it to bootloader config? -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr

2012-01-10 Thread Michał Górny
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 12:56:11 -0600 Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote: Michał Górny wrote: On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:14:52 +0100 Enrico Weigeltweig...@metux.de wrote: * Micha?? Górnymgo...@gentoo.org schrieb: Does working hard involve compiling even more packages statically? I guess

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr

2012-01-10 Thread Michał Górny
when I get the chance and know that this init crap isn't going to break my rig. It's not being awesome either. Remind me of a single good reason. Last time I heard those were mostly hacks and laziness. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr

2012-01-11 Thread Michał Górny
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 10:34:34 -0600 Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote: Michał Górny wrote: On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:40:01 -0600 Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote: I keep hoping that all the smart people involved in this will see the mess it is creating. I'm not the sharpest tool in the shed

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr

2012-01-11 Thread Michał Górny
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 09:44:31 +0100 Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, Michał Górny wrote: I think it is more like people do that when they have a good reason to do so. I plan to put mine on /usr when I get the chance and know that this init crap isn't going

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFD: split out some functions from eutils.eclass?

2012-01-11 Thread Michał Górny
for f in ${CDROM_CHECK_1//:/ } ; do ((++CDROM_SET)) More when I get replies on these ones. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH xorg-2] Reuse autoreconf feature from autotools-utils.

2012-01-16 Thread Michał Górny
autotools-utils is now capable of autoreconfiguring packages, and the patch-trigger may cause packages to be reconfigured twice. After the update, xorg-2 will just trigger autoreconf in autotools-utils rather than repeating it. --- xorg-2.eclass | 10 ++ 1 files changed, 6

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH autotools-utils] Autoreconf on user patches only.

2012-01-16 Thread Michał Górny
Right now, any patch which modifies common autotools source files triggers autoreconf. In some cases, this causes the package to be reconfigured twice -- once by the eclass, and the second time by the ebuild. To avoid that, trigger autoreconfiguration only when user patches modify these files.

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr

2012-01-17 Thread Michał Górny
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 21:38:26 -0600 Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote: Michał Górny wrote: On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:14:52 +0100 Enrico Weigeltweig...@metux.de wrote: * Micha?? Górnymgo...@gentoo.org schrieb: Does working hard involve compiling even more packages statically? I guess

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr

2012-01-18 Thread Michał Górny
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 01:20:03 -0600 Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote: Michał Górny wrote: On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 21:38:26 -0600 Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote: Michał Górny wrote: On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:14:52 +0100 Enrico Weigeltweig...@metux.de wrote: * Micha?? Górnymgo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFD: split out some functions from eutils.eclass?

2012-01-18 Thread Michał Górny
root at ... -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFD: split out some functions from eutils.eclass?

2012-01-18 Thread Michał Górny
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 09:48:59 -0500 Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wednesday 18 January 2012 08:39:04 Michał Górny wrote: On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 06:22:24 -0500 Mike Frysinger wrote: # now we see if the user gave use CD_ROOT ... # if they did, let's just believe

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFD: split out some functions from eutils.eclass?

2012-01-18 Thread Michał Górny
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:29:27 -0500 Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wednesday 18 January 2012 14:11:14 Michał Górny wrote: On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 09:48:59 -0500 Mike Frysinger wrote: On Wednesday 18 January 2012 08:39:04 Michał Górny wrote: On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 06:22:24 -0500 Mike

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFD: split out some functions from eutils.eclass?

2012-01-18 Thread Michał Górny
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:16:02 -0500 Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wednesday 18 January 2012 15:14:05 Michał Górny wrote: On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:29:27 -0500 Mike Frysinger wrote: On Wednesday 18 January 2012 14:11:14 Michał Górny wrote: On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 09:48:59 -0500 Mike

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFD: split out some functions from eutils.eclass?

2012-01-18 Thread Michał Górny
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:39:24 -0500 Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wednesday 18 January 2012 15:28:45 Michał Górny wrote: On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:16:02 -0500 Mike Frysinger wrote: On Wednesday 18 January 2012 15:14:05 Michał Górny wrote: On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:29:27 -0500 Mike

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-libs/glibc: glibc-2.14.1-r2.ebuild glibc-2.12.2.ebuild glibc-9999.ebuild glibc-2.15.ebuild glibc-2.10.1-r1.ebuild glibc-2.14.1-r1.ebuild

2012-01-19 Thread Michał Górny
/locale.alias' not found: No such file or directory [ !! ] -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-libs/glibc: glibc-2.14.1-r2.ebuild glibc-2.12.2.ebuild glibc-9999.ebuild glibc-2.15.ebuild glibc-2.10.1-r1.ebuild glibc-2.14.1-r1.ebuild

2012-01-19 Thread Michał Górny
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 03:42:14 +0100 Michael Weber x...@gentoo.org wrote: Um, what happend to the policy to not f*** around with stable ebuilds? I don't think such a rule has any meaning considering that those ebuilds are mostly contained in an eclass. -- Best regards, Michał Górny

Re: [gentoo-dev] doubtful about libjpeg-turbo vs. libjpeg binary compatibility

2012-01-19 Thread Michał Górny
-incompatible versions); we don't really want to go the Debian way, keeping our own SONAME cycles. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr

2012-01-21 Thread Michał Górny
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 06:28:54 -0600 Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote: Michał Górny wrote: On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 01:20:03 -0600 Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote: Michał Górny wrote: On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 21:38:26 -0600 Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote: Michał Górny wrote: On Tue, 10

Re: [gentoo-dev] Free Gentoo

2012-01-21 Thread Michał Górny
I want to be funny too. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr

2012-01-21 Thread Michał Górny
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 15:34:39 -0600 Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote: Michał Górny wrote: On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 06:28:54 -0600 Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote: Michał Górny wrote: On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 01:20:03 -0600 Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote: Michał Górny wrote: On Tue, 17

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH autotools-utils] Determine need of autoreconf through checksums, not mtimes.

2012-01-22 Thread Michał Górny
Fixes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=399641 --- autotools-utils.eclass | 15 +-- 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/autotools-utils.eclass b/autotools-utils.eclass index 7ed6856..5d2a987 100644 --- a/autotools-utils.eclass +++

Re: [gentoo-dev] How to handle x86/amd64 only packages on other arches

2012-01-25 Thread Michał Górny
some kind of portage-capable cross-toolchain for that package. I'd suggest you *DEPEND on it through: || ( sys-apps/seabios sys-apps/seabios-bin ) so that x86 users could still choose the binary package for some reason. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP

Re: [gentoo-dev] useless set*id binaries

2012-01-28 Thread Michał Górny
to be able to do this? Doesn't passing dev=... directly work? -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] unpacker.eclass

2012-02-01 Thread Michał Górny
to subtle differences. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] unpacker.eclass

2012-02-01 Thread Michał Górny
intended to generate an useless DEPEND or you have to reset src_unpack() to default to make the archives actually extractable. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] unpacker.eclass

2012-02-01 Thread Michał Górny
On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 15:55:46 -0500 Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wednesday 01 February 2012 15:51:52 Michał Górny wrote: On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 15:44:14 -0500 Mike Frysinger wrote: # @USAGE: [archives that we will unpack] # @RETURN: Dependencies needed to unpack all

Re: [gentoo-dev] unpacker.eclass

2012-02-02 Thread Michał Górny
On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 19:33:54 -0500 Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wednesday 01 February 2012 18:12:02 Michał Górny wrote: On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 15:55:46 -0500 Mike Frysinger wrote: On Wednesday 01 February 2012 15:51:52 Michał Górny wrote: On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 15:44:14 -0500 Mike

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Application name in metadata.xml

2012-02-11 Thread Michał Górny
think we already expand the name in DESCRIPTION whenever it is ambiguous. Could you please mention some Gentoo examples which would benefit from the proposed change? -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Application name in metadata.xml

2012-02-12 Thread Michał Górny
ebuild name. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC patch for obs-service.eclass

2012-02-21 Thread Michał Górny
/suse-build|g' {} + -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo Janitor scripts

2012-02-22 Thread Michał Górny
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 09:48:52 +0100 Corentin Chary corentin.ch...@gmail.com wrote: From that output we can easilly find out new entries to thirdpartymirrors, for example: gentoo-devhttp://dev.gentoo.org Mirrors shouldn't be used as a dumb URL shortener. -- Best regards, Michał Górny

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD: EAPI specification in ebuilds

2012-03-08 Thread Michał Górny
or making ebuilds PM-centric? -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD: EAPI specification in ebuilds

2012-03-08 Thread Michał Górny
, without having to lookup random variables, functions etc. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD: EAPI specification in ebuilds

2012-03-08 Thread Michał Górny
On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 10:56:21 -0500 Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.com wrote: On 03/08/2012 07:03 AM, Michał Górny wrote: Someone suggested using a standard shebang the last time this came up, and if I remember correctly it was one of the least-disagreeable solutions proposed. We could

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD: EAPI specification in ebuilds

2012-03-08 Thread Michał Górny
, or disregarding backwards compatibility with older package managers for no actual benefit. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] eselect repository moved to git

2012-03-08 Thread Michał Górny
you just do the ultimately ugly thing of having two repos in one, as two completely diverged branches? -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD: EAPI specification in ebuilds

2012-03-08 Thread Michał Górny
to requiring a specific EAPI=4 format, but does allow you to do stupid things like x=`seq 4 4`; eapi $x; if you want. What advantage does it give us? We still can't change ebuild syntax in global scope because bash will barf. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] media-optical, net-zope, sgml, text-markup herds are empty

2012-03-09 Thread Michał Górny
drop that herds, assign packages to maintainer-needed and wait developers to grab whatever they want For net-zope, I'd prefer dropping it. We decided to get rid of Zope, removed almost all relevant packages, so there's no point in keeping the herd. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD: EAPI specification in ebuilds

2012-03-09 Thread Michał Górny
On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 00:35:14 -0500 Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.com wrote: On 03/09/2012 12:04 AM, Michał Górny wrote: This is of course isomorphic to requiring a specific EAPI=4 format, but does allow you to do stupid things like x=`seq 4 4`; eapi $x; if you want. What

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >