Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: adding GOPATH to ENV_UNSET in base profile

chellh/go-homedir@v1.1.0: open /home/rafael/dev/git/go/pkg/mod/cache/download/ github.com/mitchellh/go-homedir/@v/v1.1.0.ziphash: permission denied > Thanks, > > William > > [1] > https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/163010f83ae7819d80c0cfdf797cbfe0 > Thanks,

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-dns/dnsimple-dyndns

# Rafael G. Martins (2020-03-27) # Python 2 only. Uses old version of DNSimple API. # Removal in 30 days. Bug #712960 net-dns/dnsimple-dyndns -- Rafael

[gentoo-dev] packages up for grabs

app-emulation/qemu-init-scripts app-text/txt2tags dev-lua/luadoc dev-lua/luaexpat dev-lua/luafilesystem dev-lua/luarocks dev-lua/luasec dev-lua/toluapp dev-vcs/mercurial-server www-apps/trac-accountmanager www-apps/trac-mercurial www-apps/trac-tags -- Rafael

Re: [gentoo-dev] Signed push & clock drift rejection

ld box and git push takes 20-40 seconds, while this > is within your limits, the margin is not safe. > > What if someone needs to commit via 2G GPRS or similar slow network > link? Afaik we have developers on quite slow and unstable links. > > Just set this limit to 5 minutes to make it a sane protection of a > stale push. > > Best regards, > Andrew Savchenko -- Rafael Goncalves Martins Gentoo Linux developer http://rafaelmartins.eng.br/

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-vcs/blogc-git-receiver, www-server/blogc-runserver

# Rafael G. Martins (30 Apr 2016) # Packages merged upstream with app-text/blogc. Please install # app-text/blogc with USE=git and USE=httpd instead. Removal in 30 days. dev-vcs/blogc-git-receiver www-server/blogc-runserver -- Rafael Goncalves Martins Gentoo Linux developer http

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gitolite with WebHooks: testers wanted

On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 2:27 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > Hi all, > > Amongst Git migration preparations, one of the previously mentioned > items was that GitHub's webhooks were very useful for many tasks. > > The QA team is already using them on the gentoo-portage-rsync-mirror > repo, to trigger

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] luajit global useflag

On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 6:46 PM, Rafael Goncalves Martins wrote: > On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov > wrote: >> В письме от Вс, 1 марта 2015 20:36:03 пользователь Ben de Groot написал: >>> >>> Or maybe one of the other lua package maintainer

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] luajit global useflag

ility between different versions and interpreters. Creating static libraries is something that distributions want (and is generally the best approach), but the upstream developers don't care about this at all. That said, if you want to go that way, you are in your own, upstream isn'

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making more repoman checks fatal

t: > https://bugs.gentoo.org/405017 > https://bugs.gentoo.org/488836 > https://bugs.gentoo.org/533460 > -mike I think that just the last bug is still valid. []s -- Rafael Goncalves Martins Gentoo Linux developer http://rafaelmartins.eng.br/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 6:49 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > Due ferringb retirement the following packages are up for grabs: > ... > dev-util/diffball > I'll take it. -- Rafael Goncalves Martins Gentoo Linux developer http://rafaelmartins.eng.br/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: dev-libs/fcgi

On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Rafael Goncalves Martins < rafaelmart...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Hans de Graaff wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I thought I already dropped maintainership of this package a long time >> ago, since I haven&

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: dev-libs/fcgi

his up if you > still use fastcgi. > > dev-libs/fcgi > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=469794 is the one open bug about > the AM_CONFIG_HEADER macro. > > Hans > > > I'm still using it. will get it if nobody gets until tomorrow :) -- Rafael Goncalves Martins Gentoo Linux developer http://rafaelmartins.eng.br/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Automagic pax-mark

w this thread. Disable xattr isn't a very common use case, but it is still valid. I don't want to have my builds falling at install phase just because the binary can't be pax-mark'ed, when I clearly don't care about PaX. If we don't want the automagic behavior, we should allow users to explicitly disable it. -- Rafael Goncalves Martins Gentoo Linux developer http://rafaelmartins.eng.br/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: media-tv/tvtime

tv hw anymore. I'd like to avoid it being treecleaned, but without the hw, it is just impossible. -- Rafael Goncalves Martins Gentoo Linux developer http://rafaelmartins.eng.br/

[gentoo-dev] Lastrite: www-client/xxxterm

# Rafael G. Martins (31 Jan 2013) # Renamed to xombrero. Please install www-client/xombrero (bug #417555) # The package was not pkg-moved to fix the upstream versioning mess. # Removal in 30 days www-client/xxxterm -- Rafael Goncalves Martins Gentoo Linux developer http://rafaelmartins.eng.br/

Re: [gentoo-dev] stabilization candidates rss feed & html pages

idates into > the pkgs status reports it does. > > Second reason, I believe it is getting or already has deployment on > gentoo infra servers. > > I pinged `fox` in #-www about it, Corentin wasn't online there > at the time. cc'ing them here. I think that euscan would benefit of this feature, but the your arguments against ruby/paludis aren't valid IMO. If the euscan guys want to integrate the feature, nice. If not, lets just stick with this script. It is simple enough that even ruby n00bs like me can understand what it does :P BR. -- Rafael Goncalves Martins Gentoo Linux developer http://rafaelmartins.eng.br/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Switching order of packages in virtual/pkgconfig

didn't have issues with the pkg-config bootstrap > either. there is no circular deps either. > > lose-lose situation for the switch, so over my commit access ;-) > I agree with you. The original implementation should be our default. People interested in get rid of the glib dependency should be able to replace pkg-config with pkgconf manually. No need to make an "unofficial" implementation the default. Regards, -- Rafael Goncalves Martins Gentoo Linux developer http://rafaelmartins.eng.br/

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: change of the default value for EHG_REVISION (mercurial.eclass)

the change. >> >> -- >> Christoph Junghans >> http://dev.gentoo.org/~ottxor/ >> > > Sounds good to me; using "tip" never made sense to me either. > +1 -- Rafael Goncalves Martins Gentoo Linux developer http://rafaelmartins.eng.br/

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs: prosody + lua deps

ted! Feel free to add yourself as co-maintainer of any of these packages that I'm listed as maintainer, and to ask questions related to lua on IRC. I should be around, even if not very active on package maintenance. BR, -- Rafael Goncalves Martins Gentoo Linux developer http://rafaelmartins.eng.br/

Re: [gentoo-dev] udev-ng? (Was: Summary Council meeting Tuesday 13 November 2012)

On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Rafael Goncalves Martins wrote: > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Rafael Goncalves Martins >> wrote: >>> Yeah, but I think that there's a big difference about any developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] udev-ng? (Was: Summary Council meeting Tuesday 13 November 2012)

On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Rafael Goncalves Martins > wrote: >> Yeah, but I think that there's a big difference about any developer >> being allowed to create a project under the gentoo umbrella and create >&

Re: [gentoo-dev] udev-ng? (Was: Summary Council meeting Tuesday 13 November 2012)

On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Rafael Goncalves Martins > wrote: >> If these organizations aren't governed by Gentoo they should have some >> disclaimers, saying that the projects hosted there aren't sponsored

Re: [gentoo-dev] udev-ng? (Was: Summary Council meeting Tuesday 13 November 2012)

ewer. > We should definitely put it into agenda. You really want to compare pornview, that was dead and someone kindly resurrected, with udev, that is actively maintained and the quality of the fork is questionable? :( >> And if that is the decision of the council, I would expect the ability >> to have some type of discussion about it, wouldn't you? >> >> Also, the whole issue with the copyrights is very serious, for the >> reasons I've stated before. Don't mess with copyrights, developers, and >> companies, take them very serious, as they are the basis for our >> licenses. >> >> thanks, >> >> greg k-h >> > > > -- Rafael Goncalves Martins Gentoo Linux developer http://rafaelmartins.eng.br/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: CIA replacement

icity of the CIA stats, and currently uses an almost always outdated git clone of our cvs tree to gather the stats. -- Rafael Goncalves Martins Gentoo Linux developer http://rafaelmartins.eng.br/

Re: [gentoo-dev] CIA replacement

On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Rafael Goncalves Martins > wrote: >> Maybe someone with good cvs knowledge can contribute a hook for irker >> [1], so we can have #gentoo-commits flooding our irc clients again! :) > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] CIA replacement

.html > 2: http://www.donarmstrong.com/posts/switching_to_kgb/ Maybe someone with good cvs knowledge can contribute a hook for irker [1], so we can have #gentoo-commits flooding our irc clients again! :) [1] http://www.catb.org/esr/irker/ Best regards. -- Rafael Goncalves Martins Gentoo Li

Re: [gentoo-dev] A friendly reminder: Ciaran McCreesh is not a Gentoo dev

position of Gentoo development team. > > Right. Doesn't that make me more important than you? > > https://lwn.net/Articles/501815/ > > -- > Ciaran McCreesh This thread is totally useless, but that lwn link made my day. Thank you. -- Rafael Goncalves Martins Gentoo Linux developer http://rafaelmartins.eng.br/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver

-1 -- Rafael Goncalves Martins Gentoo Linux developer http://rafaelmartins.eng.br/

Re: [gentoo-dev] have portage be quiet by default

=n > in their default emerge opts. Then why not you and the other 2 guys that approved this change here (and are the only people I saw approving this, TBH), add --quiet-build=y to your default emerge opts and avoid this kind of change? Regards, -- Rafael Goncalves Martins Gentoo Linux developer http://rafaelmartins.eng.br/

Re: [gentoo-dev] have portage be quiet by default

to view the log while > building. > > Please consider reverting it and let users set it with EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS > if they want it less noisy. +1 -- Rafael Goncalves Martins Gentoo Linux developer http://rafaelmartins.eng.br/

Re: [gentoo-dev] FEATURES="stricter" as a default in developer profile not the best idea

On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 9:42 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > TLDR: Let's remove FEATURES="stricter" from developer profile, I bet > most people have it disabled anyway and it doesn't seem useful. > Really, I disabled it. +1 Regards, -- Rafael Goncal

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: splitting virtual/

>>>> Maybe they could be transformed into 'perl-virtual/*'? >>> >>> why? >> >> Because I like categories much more than I do prefixes. >> > > But right now all virtuals are easily recognizable and nicely grouped > into one category. From my point of view that's the best categorization > we could ask for ... what would we gain from changing it? > Nothing IMO. +1 to keep virtuals as they are now. Regards, -- Rafael Goncalves Martins Gentoo Linux developer http://rafaelmartins.eng.br/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ohloh statistics updated

the likely cause. > > Each user can setup an ignore list from the ohloh interface. don't know if there's a way to ignore files project-side. Regards, -- Rafael Goncalves Martins Gentoo Linux developer http://rafaelmartins.eng.br/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Turning eclasses upside down with new EAPIs (the python eclasses)

f the > possible upcoming retirement of Arfrever :-/). What is preventing python > team to merge eclass from overlay? > AFAIK, the EAPI4 support in the overlay is EAPI 4-python, that almost certainly will never come to gx86, and some guys are trying to port the functionality to raw EAPI4, IIRC. Regards, -- Rafael Goncalves Martins Gentoo Linux developer http://rafaelmartins.eng.br/

[gentoo-dev] anion3 - an ion3 fork

-- Rafael Goncalves Martins Gentoo Linux developer http://rafaelmartins.eng.br/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New category for Lua related packages

Looks like the new category is created and the packages are moved! If you have some issue with the pkgmoves, please reopen the tracker bug,open a new bug and make the tracker depends on it. Thanks guys! :) -- Rafael Goncalves Martins Gentoo Linux developer http://rafaelmartins.eng.br/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New category for Lua related packages

I've just created a tracker bug [1] and CC'd the affected maintainers. [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=344229 Best regards, -- Rafael Goncalves Martins Gentoo Linux developer http://rafaelmartins.eng.br/

Re: [gentoo-dev] New category for Lua related packages

On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > On 08:09 Tue 02 Nov     , "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: >> On 11/2/10 4:24 AM, Rafael Goncalves Martins wrote: >> > I think that a first step should be create a new category, maybe >> > called dev-lua, for

Re: [gentoo-dev] New category for Lua related packages

On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 5:09 AM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > On 11/2/10 4:24 AM, Rafael Goncalves Martins wrote: >> I think that a first step should be create a new category, maybe >> called dev-lua, for all the Lua related stuff. > > Just checking: how many packag

[gentoo-dev] New category for Lua related packages

think that a first step should be create a new category, maybe called dev-lua, for all the Lua related stuff. Are any of you against the creation of this new category? [1] http://rafaelmartins.eng.br/en-us/post/lua-libraries-on-gentoo/ [2] http://www.lua.org/ Best regards, -- Rafael Goncalves Ma

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in server profiles

will mostly use > apache or something different. And especially for minimal setups, i dont > think that apache will be > the first choice, so i agree with the removal of those USE flags from default > IUSE. > The profile is intended to have a minimal set of flags, i would call apache > an additional optional > flag, not a default option for minimal server setups. > Totally agreed! Best regards. -- Rafael Goncalves Martins Gentoo Linux developer http://rafaelmartins.eng.br/