Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-devel/gcc::mgorny up for testing

On 2014-12-07 11:37, Michał Górny wrote: Hello, developers and users. As some of you know, the toolchain packages in Gentoo suffer from lack-of-sanity issues and their maintainers are completely unwilling to improve things. I have finally decided to start working on a fork of the sys-devel/gcc

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: www-apps/egroupware

On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 8:50 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote: > On Thursday, July 07, 2016 06:37:09 AM Duncan wrote: > > J. Roeleveld posted on Wed, 06 Jul 2016 20:22:57 +0200 as excerpted: > > > On Thursday, June 30, 2016 10:30:07 PM Aaron Bauman wrote: > > >> # Aaron Bauman

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

These packages are now up for grabs: dev-python/httmock dev-python/jenkins-autojobs dev-python/jenkins-webapi dev-python/jenkinsapi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: stable gcc 5.4.0 ??

On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Jörg Schaible < joerg.schai...@bpm-inspire.com> wrote: > Hi Tomas, > > Tomas Mozes wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Jörg Schaible < > > joerg.schai...@bpm-inspire.com> wrote: > > > >> Hi, &

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: stable gcc 5.4.0 ??

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 8:25 PM, Walter Dnes wrote: > > It is stable. Even there are open bugs, arches started stabilizing it. > > Is gcc-5.4.0 built "--with-default-libstdcxx-abi=gcc4-compatible"? > On the Pale Moon linux sub-forum, there were crashing issues with the >

Re: [gentoo-dev] stable gcc 5.4.0 ??

On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Jörg Schaible < joerg.schai...@bpm-inspire.com> wrote: > Hi, > > according the logs, gcc 4.5.0-r3 is stable for amd64: > https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/log/sys-devel/gcc?showmsg=1 > > However, after synching the tree, this version is still unstable for

Re: [gentoo-dev] stable gcc 5.4.0 ??

On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Jörg Schaible < joerg.schai...@bpm-inspire.com> wrote: > Hi, > > according the logs, gcc 4.5.0-r3 is stable for amd64: > https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/log/sys-devel/gcc?showmsg=1 > > However, after synching the tree, this version is still unstable for

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: stable gcc 5.4.0 ??

On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 3:12 PM, Jörg Schaible < joerg.schai...@bpm-inspire.com> wrote: > Tomas Mozes wrote: > > [snip] > > > As mentioned by others, bugs on packages.gentoo.org will not affect your > > portage tree. I've just installed gcc 5.4.0-r3 on amd64, so try

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: stable gcc 5.4.0 ??

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 9:31 AM, Jörg Schaible < joerg.schai...@bpm-inspire.com> wrote: > Tomas Mozes wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Jörg Schaible < > > joerg.schai...@bpm-inspire.com> wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Fixing elasticsearch maintainer

On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 6:50 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote: > I tried removing proxy-maint from metadata after multiple discussions > failed. Extra happiness towards monsieurp "but the GH PR is over 3 days > old, I have to commit" and gokturk "Yes I understand. I commit anyway" > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Fixing elasticsearch maintainer

On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote: > > I "was" package maintainer and relied on these versions. > > If I as maintainer have no control over such things, why am I maintainer, > and why do I need an overlay? > > > ... that sounds exquisitely confused, I have

Re: [gentoo-dev] Fixing elasticsearch maintainer

On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote: > For some strange reason I was listed there as maintainer, but since no one > wanted to listen to my ideas I guess I wasn't. So now last person who > touched it gets stuck with it. > For elasticsearch, you added

[gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: dev-util/yuicompressor

The following package is up for grabs: dev-util/yuicompressor It's a js/css minifier written in Java

Re: [gentoo-dev] Is there any way I can help with pull requests?

You can review the PRs and try to remove common errors before the devs check it. Then they don't have to correct the same mistakes again. I don't mean you do the corrections, you just suggest them to the PR authors so they probably won't repeat them again. Common stuff like: - using latest eapi

[gentoo-dev] RFC: UID/GID assignment for logstash (270)

I would like to reserve UID/GID 270 for logstash (app-admin/logstash-bin). I haven't found the ID in other databases. Pending PR: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/12375 Thanks, Tomas

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: UID/GID assignment for logstash (270)

On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 3:31 PM Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 8/8/19 3:37 AM, Tomas Mozes wrote: > > > > Pending PR: > > https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/12375 > > > > Is the group-writability really needed here? > > > ACCT_USER_HOME_PERMS=0770 >

[gentoo-dev] RFC: UID/GID assignment for kibana (269)

I would like to reserve UID/GID 269 for kibana (www-apps/kibana-bin). The uid/gid used in Arch for kibana is taken by qmail in Gentoo. Pending PR: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/12984 Thanks, Tomas

[gentoo-dev] RFC: UID/GID assignment for elasticsearch (183)

I would like to reserve UID/GID 183 for elasticsearch (app-misc/elasticsearch). It's the same as in Fedora. Pending PR: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/12983 Thanks, Tomas

[gentoo-dev] RFC: UID/GID assignment for mongodb (481)

Hello, I'd like to reserve UID/GID 481 for dev-db/mongodb. UID/GID from fedora is already taken, so allocating the next free. Pending PR: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/13529 Thanks, Tomas

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-mail/pflogsumm

On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 11:22 AM Michał Górny wrote: > # Michał Górny (2019-11-06) > # Unmaintained. EAPI 0. Last revdep gone. > # Removal in 30 days. Bug #699438. > net-mail/pflogsumm > > -- > Best regards, > Michał Górny > > I'll take it: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/13567

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Last rites: net-analyzer/zabbix

On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 11:13 AM Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote: > I'm using zabbix, but I can't sign up as the single active maintainer, > although, I'd be happy to co-maintain it with somebody else. > > BTW, @mgorny, as I see, Patrick already fixed the issue, so can we talk > about > unmasking

[gentoo-dev] RFC: UID/GID assignment for redis (75)

Hello, Redis allocated UID/GID 75 via the user eclass, converting to acct-user/group in PR: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/13619 Tomas

Re: [gentoo-dev] acct-{group,user}/minetest request for ID 481

On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 4:50 AM Joonas Niilola wrote: > > On 11/4/19 1:37 AM, William Breathitt Gray wrote: > > Hello, > > > > `games-action/minetest` creates a "minetest" user and group with random > > respective IDs, used for running the Minetest server daemon. The latest > > version bump PR

[gentoo-dev] RFC: UID/GID assignment for graylog (478)

Hello, I'd like to reserve gid/uid 478 for graylog. Haven't found in other databases, this seems like the next free id. https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/13727 Thanks, Tomas

Re: [gentoo-dev] UID/GID assignment for kibana

On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 6:36 PM Joonas Niilola wrote: > Hey, > > > On 9/20/19 7:12 PM, Tomas Mozes wrote: > > Hi there, > > while trying to implement glep 81 for kibana I found out that Arch > > Linux uses uid 183 for it, but it's taken by qmail.eclass. Should a &g

[gentoo-dev] UID/GID assignment for kibana

Hi there, while trying to implement glep 81 for kibana I found out that Arch Linux uses uid 183 for it, but it's taken by qmail.eclass. Should a new uid/gid be taken or it's safe to assume no one will mix kibana with qmail? Thanks, Tomas

Re: [gentoo-dev] automated build failure bugs

On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 9:46 AM Jaco Kroon wrote: > Hi All, > > Example: https://bugs.gentoo.org/710484 > > Relates to the dropping of my_bool from mysql-connector-c. > > This has been addressed upstream and a ~ ebuild has been pushed. > > My question is simple: Is that good enough to close

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-admin/ngxtop

On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 2:04 PM Michał Górny wrote: > # Michał Górny (2020-04-19) > # Unmaintained. Stuck on Python 3.6. Last upstream activity in 2015. > # Removal in 30 days. Bug #718184. > app-admin/ngxtop > > -- > Best regards, > Michał Górny > > I know it's old, but it works with python

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Anti-spam for goose

On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 10:47 AM Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, > > TL;DR: I'm looking for opinions on how to protect goose from spam, > i.e. mass fake submissions. > > > Problem > === > Goose currently lacks proper limiting of submitted data. The only > limiter currently in place is based on

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Anti-spam for goose

On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 12:10 PM Michał Górny wrote: > On Thu, 2020-05-21 at 11:48 +0200, Tomas Mozes wrote: > > On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 10:47 AM Michał Górny wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > TL;DR: I'm looking for opinions on how to protect goose f

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Bootloader use in eclean-kernel

On Friday, May 22, 2020, Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, everyone. > > I've finally found some time to revive eclean-kernel, and I'm having > some doubts about the way bootloaders are used (in ek1). I'd like to > hear your opinion on whether the old behavior should be kept or removed > in favor of

Re: [gentoo-dev] nginx: slot mainline

On Friday, May 22, 2020, Samuel Bernardo wrote: > Hi, > > I realize today that nginx ebuild have a new slot mainline. The current > ebuild stable version 1.17 came from mainline. Anyone knows if this > means that is not the stable version of nginx? > > After reading the following blog post I

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: switching default udev provider for new systems to udev

On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 8:51 PM William Hubbs wrote: > All, > > I would like to propose that we switch the default udev provider on new > systems from eudev to udev. > > This is not a lastrites, and it will not affect current systems since > they have to migrate manually. Also, this change can be

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: dev-python/elasticsearch-curator and dev-python/elasticsearch-py

Hello, seems like elasticsearch-curator is lacking behind as it went from a full-time job project to a hobby weekend project. https://bugs.gentoo.org/714860 There is a new release, however it still depends on an older click version. I've replaced it with a simple bash script. Tomas

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: app-benchmarks/sysbench

Hello, dropping myself as maintainer on these packages: app-benchmarks/sysbench (https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/18350) dev-db/percona-xtrabackup (https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/18349) sysbench is dropping to m-n. Tomas

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] 2021-07-07-systemd-tmpfiles: add news item

On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 4:38 AM Georgy Yakovlev wrote: > Signed-off-by: Sam James > Signed-off-by: Georgy Yakovlev > --- > .../2021-07-07-systemd-tmpfiles.en.txt| 48 +++ > 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Call for testing from toolchain team: glibc-2.34

On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 1:39 AM Sam James wrote: > Hi, > > toolchain@ would appreciate if folks could keyword glibc-2.34 locally > on non-production machines to help root out any bugs. > > The tracker bug is doing pretty well at this point with most remaining > issues being in last-rited

[gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: app-admin/graylog

Hello the following package is up for grabs app-admin/graylog https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/app-admin/graylog Tomas

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs (elastic)

Seems like I won't be using these packages in version >7, while there is version 8.1 out now: - app-admin/filebeat - app-admin/logstash-bin - app-misc/elasticsearch - www-apps/kibana-bin Please consider adding yourself to maintainers if you use them. Tomas

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Last rites:

On Monday, January 23, 2023, David Seifert wrote: > # David Seifert (2023-01-23) > # EOL branch, switch to mariadb-10.4/galera-26.4, removal on 2023-02-22. > > Mariadb 10.3 will be supported until May 2023, any reason to drop it now?