not appear to line-wrap.
Cheers,
- --
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFF3JDxdKvgdVioq28RAoFiAJ9zwbp02+R2NXui2mRcvggQPxeU7QCbBBWq
QoJHc/OPnat3SJfYZqDeQ4A=
=OgS1
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
, but
that burning hole in your committing pocket can wait.
Cheers,
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
at least give us a bug indicating why you
felt the need to drop our keywords from a revision or version bump of a
package.
Not to be a hard ass, but repeat offenders will be reported to both the QA
and DevRel teams.
Cheers,
- --
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
,
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Linux/SPARC normally does try to handle Security
issues before others if the others aren't critical.
Cheers,
- --
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFR3IBdKvgdVioq28RArMdAJ49AsBl3DjtA5n22atL7FpY0jYwVACeLeV7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
To whomever added the oracle use flag,
Please mask it on all architectures Oracle doesn't support on Linux. Or
better yet, mask it everywhere and only unmask it on the architectures
that support Oracle.
Thanks,
- --
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc
Consider yourself warned. Violation of any of these will cause the
jforman death goat squad to be dispatched to your location for a discreet
hit. For repeat offenders, public executions will be had, with Spanky
hosting.
Thanks :)
- --
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
-BEGIN PGP
.
Cheers,
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
opinion but your own :-P
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
then they would not be optional,
and hence not even be USE flags at all, no? Or am I missing something?
This could allow for us to get rid of the nofoo use flag nomenclature that
folks have been doing for functionality that is highly suggested to be on
by default.
Cheers,
- --
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc
flag
enabled but only on arch bar, arch bar can mask it but no other arches
are affected).
Cheers,
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 19:56:01 -0400
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
huh ? i think you're thinking of per-package use.mask, not
per-package use defaults
Oh yeah good call.
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
. For us it would be very very handy to be able to do this rather than
lots of stuff like foo? (!arch bar baz) and the like as well as printing
out additional ewarns to note that this use flag doesn't work on this arch
for this package that no one ever sees.
Cheers,
- --
Jason Wever
Gentoo
as it's already ridiculously long ...
Thanks for the nomination! :) However I don't feel that I currently
have the time to put towards this that it needs.
Here is hoping towards next year :)
Cheers,
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
did this, why didn't you attempt to let us know when
exactly you were doing this so we could have some working alternative in
place?
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
,
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
and if you ever happen to come across
a soft ice cream machine for the dev lounge...
Cheers,
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
and are thinking that this email is really for the birds,
please consult your friendly neighborhood developer handbook as this is
all in there too.
Remember, only you can save the goats from jforman.
Thanks,
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 13:39:15 -0800
Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Latest list:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/broken_modular/broken_modular_maintainers.txt.20060202
Returns a 404
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
here, but breaking the portage tree
should never be an acceptable answer.
Cheers,
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
a lot of us non-x86
arch monkeys have a lot of work on our hands.
Cheers,
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
in testing keywords yet in the
non-testing profiles.
Cheers,
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
today and is now marked unstable.
Is there any particular reason that the utf8 use flag was re-introduced
rather than using the unicode use flag like everything else does (and was
standardized on)?
Regards,
- --
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Co-Team Lead
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version
the maintainer wants to mark it stable,
right?
Mostly us needing to stabilize sooner, but in some cases the opposite is
true as well (for instance cases where it works for some but not
others).
Cheers,
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
pgprD5XNtoZFc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
in Bugzilla as normal.
I've filed notes in the tracker bug you put in the Gentoo Bugzilla but
other than your initial response, I haven't gotten any feedback on them.
Cheers,
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
pgpjcekTCVegI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
in the case
where earlier versions are broken.
This is not entirely uncommon to see packages that used to compile with
stable keywords no longer compile after a period of time.
Cheers,
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
pgp7aZ5u0rxVe.pgp
Description: PGP signature
,
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
pgpNWIIeP2Vm3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
are using a non-gentoo bug system to work on
this? It seems a bit redundant and un-needed in my layman's
perspective.
Cheers,
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
pgp5hCWdFPPqk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
for any
architectures when you do this cleanup.
Thanks,
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
pgpj72TsQGbdV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
added it for.
Thanks! :)
- --
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Co-Team Lead
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFC/+WcdKvgdVioq28RAh9JAJ9MEkIARHmkFq6nZ/hUa+46ergbcgCgsab4
i157VQ04ba6/iPcyaIorblc=
=lZN5
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
from this list but have
notified the SPARC team in the past about an ability to keyword or if
you need to update what information is on the list.
Thanks,
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
pgpPYIrbu4zLK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
is
thwarting their use flag preferences (unless the arch monkey is nice
enough to put in some einfo love).
Cheers,
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Co-Team Lead
pgpd1g1t86sYO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
, the PPC team is very good at arbitrarily marking things stable
whenever they feel like it, and often times before the maintainer does.
Cheers,
- --
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Co-Team Lead
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux
for the maintainer arch.
- --
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Co-Team Lead
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCpxtqdKvgdVioq28RAjm7AJ9psRHMb8LYB6KqAhdi/jAzKj2j8ACglq3s
s8L6J7Ims/ZPt6upqMrgtlU=
=M1Z0
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
to ensure you get the testing and verification you want on this
is to file a bug, assign it to yourself or your herd, and CC the relevant
arches.
Thanks,
- --
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Co-Team Lead
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux
== works for
you if we want to have some level of Q in QA.
Cheers,
- --
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Co-Team Lead
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCjkP3dKvgdVioq28RAqw+AJ9yuqHTVZSsdnfyFt9PgJSm3jt+2QCdEjwE
TS+flVWEr60GwuMEdWIqV/g=
=xrIF
-END PGP SIGNATURE
On Sun, 15 May 2005 22:54:20 +0200
Danny van Dyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
net-im/bitlbee
Fixed.
Cheers,
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
pgpcThbNhS88K.pgp
Description: PGP signature
37 matches
Mail list logo