Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal to undeprecate EGO_SUM

2022-09-28 Thread John Helmert III
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 05:28:00PM +0200, Florian Schmaus wrote: > I would like to continue discussing whether we should entirely deprecate > EGO_SUM without the desire to offend anyone. > > We now have a pending GitHub PR that bumps restic to 0.14 [1]. Restic is > a very popular backup

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 06/15] unpacker.eclass: Use lowercase in unpacker_src_uri_depends

2022-09-25 Thread John Helmert III
On Sun, Sep 25, 2022 at 04:04:07PM -0500, John Helmert III wrote: > On Sun, Sep 25, 2022 at 08:23:08PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > > Transform the URIs to lowercase in unpacker_src_uri_depends() for > > consistency with the behavior of _unpacker(). > > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 06/15] unpacker.eclass: Use lowercase in unpacker_src_uri_depends

2022-09-25 Thread John Helmert III
On Sun, Sep 25, 2022 at 08:23:08PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > Transform the URIs to lowercase in unpacker_src_uri_depends() for > consistency with the behavior of _unpacker(). > > Signed-off-by: Michał Górny > --- > eclass/unpacker.eclass | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/3] glep-0074: Specify the format of size and checksum fields

2022-09-24 Thread John Helmert III
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 04:03:54PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > Signed-off-by: Michał Górny > --- > glep-0074.rst | 13 + > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/glep-0074.rst b/glep-0074.rst > index 54bf216..bfbe092 100644 > --- a/glep-0074.rst > +++ b/glep-0074.rst >

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: virtual/dbus

2022-09-07 Thread John Helmert III
On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 04:56:37PM +0100, Marek Szuba wrote: > Dear everyone, > > I wonder if we should create a virtual package to allow our users - or > at least those who run systemd anyway - to choose between sys-apps/dbus > and sys-apps/dbus-broken as D-Bus implementation for their

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Encouraging using hardening options in systemd units

2022-08-22 Thread John Helmert III
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 02:10:47PM -0400, Kenton Groombridge wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I noticed that there are many systemd units which are shipped by various > packages which could be hardened, some further than they are currently and > some > that could use some hardening in general. > > For

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: media-gfx/gif2apng

2022-08-16 Thread John Helmert III
# John Helmert III (2022-08-16) # Multiple vulnerabilities, unmaintained upstream, EAPI 6. Removal in 30 # days, bug #830138 media-gfx/gif2apng signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-servers/thttpd

2022-08-16 Thread John Helmert III
# John Helmert III (2022-08-16) # Vulnerable, unmaintained upstream, maintainer says it's time for it to # go. Removal in 30 days, bug #769758 www-servers/thttpd signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-crypt/keybase

2022-08-15 Thread John Helmert III
# John Helmert III (2022-08-14) # Vulnerable, unmaintained in Gentoo, EAPI6. Removal in 30 days, # bug #772209 app-crypt/keybase signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Up for grabs: app-shells/thefuck

2022-08-14 Thread John Helmert III
app-shells/thefuck is up for grabs after the inactivity retirement of its proxied maintainer. I've gone ahead and cleaned up its many duplicate/obsolete bugs and cleaned up for a security bug, so it has one test failure bug open. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: x11-terms/mrxvt

2022-08-14 Thread John Helmert III
# John Helmert III (2022-08-14) # Remote code execution vulnerability, dead upstream. Removal in 30 # days, bug #791004. x11-terms/mrxvt signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: media-libs/libaacplus

2022-08-14 Thread John Helmert III
# John Helmert III (2022-08-14) # Dead upstream, vulnerable, no revdeps except a usedep. Removal in 30 # days, bug #618000 media-libs/libaacplus signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: sys-cluster/slurm

2022-08-14 Thread John Helmert III
# John Helmert III (2022-08-14) # Many vulnerabilities (including code execution and root privilege # escalation), effectively unmaintained. Removal in 30 days, bugs # #631552, #790296, #842789 sys-cluster/slurm signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: calico-cni-plugin, calicoctl

2022-08-14 Thread John Helmert III
# John Helmert III (2022-08-14) # Vulnerable and unmaintained for years, many open bugs, no revdeps, # EAPI 6. Removal in 30 days, bug 733354 net-misc/calico-cni-plugin net-misc/calicoctl signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-analyzer/smokeping

2022-08-14 Thread John Helmert III
# John Helmert III signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-analyzer/sguil-sensors

2022-08-10 Thread John Helmert III
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 11:01:27PM -0500, John Helmert III wrote: > # John Helmert III (2022-08-10) > # Root privilege escalation vulnerability, many open bugs. Removal in 30 > # days, bug 630752 > net-analyzer/sguil-sensors Sorry, that's net-analyzer/sguil-sensor, without a

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-analyzer/sguil-sensors

2022-08-10 Thread John Helmert III
# John Helmert III (2022-08-10) # Root privilege escalation vulnerability, many open bugs. Removal in 30 # days, bug 630752 net-analyzer/sguil-sensors signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-admin/logcheck

2022-08-10 Thread John Helmert III
# John Helmert III (2022-08-10) # Root privilege escalation vulnerability, unmaintained since the git # transition, multiple open bugs. Removal in 30 days, bug 630752 app-admin/logcheck signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Switching default password hashes from sha512 to yescrypt

2022-07-25 Thread John Helmert III
On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 03:59:59PM -0400, Joshua Kinard wrote: > On 7/25/2022 15:30, Joshua Kinard wrote: > [snip] > > > > > Some really quick looking around, I'm not finding any substantive > > discussions on why yescrypt is better than argon2. It so far seems that it > > just got implemented

Re: [gentoo-dev] Switching default password hashes from sha512 to yescrypt

2022-07-25 Thread John Helmert III
On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 03:30:08PM -0400, Joshua Kinard wrote: > On 7/25/2022 14:44, Sam James wrote: > > > > > >> On 22 Jul 2022, at 20:10, Mikhail Koliada wrote: > >> > >> Hello! > >> > >> This idea has been fluctuating in my head for quite a while given that the > >> migration had happened

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: large amount of unmaintained dev-haskell/* package

2022-07-23 Thread John Helmert III
On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 08:34:26AM -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On Sat, 2022-07-23 at 02:49 +0100, Sam James wrote: > > # Sam James (2022-07-22) > > # Monolithic mask for dev-haskell/* packages which have no reverse > > dependencies, > > # are broken, or severely out of date. The aim is to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Create an index for all qa notices

2022-07-16 Thread John Helmert III
On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 08:42:39PM +0200, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > Hello all, > > I noticed that we have many people that, after received a bug report, ask for > what the > reported 'qa notice' means. > > Sometimes there is a tracker and people can take an hint from the resolved > bugs but

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] glep-0076: Require real name instead of legal name

2022-07-11 Thread John Helmert III
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 05:28:36AM +0500, Anna Vyalkova wrote: > This patch uses more friendly language towards potential transgender > and plural contributors. > > No other projects require to use a legal name, e.g. Linux says to use > your real name[0]. I'm not sure there are *none*, but

Re: [gentoo-dev] Looking for co-maintainers for number of packages

2022-07-05 Thread John Helmert III
On Sun, Jul 03, 2022 at 09:03:04PM -0700, Georgy Yakovlev wrote: > I've been rather busy lately and can't keep up with all of my packages. > There are pending bumps, some bugs, but nothing too crazy or hard.  > So I'm looking for someone to co-maintain (or even take over if you > insist) the

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-libs/libvterm-neovim

2022-06-18 Thread John Helmert III
# John Helmert III (2022-06-19) # Untouched by maintainer since Git transition. No reverse dependencies, # unused by upstream, vulnerable. Removal in 30 days. Bug #678705 dev-libs/libvterm-neovim signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs (gui-apps/wf-recorder)

2022-06-15 Thread John Helmert III
gui-apps/wf-recorder has been dropped to maintainer-needed due to its proxied maintainer being retired. I've gone ahead and bumped it to 0.3.0, fixing the only open bug against it. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: sys-cluster/csync2

2022-06-15 Thread John Helmert III
# John Helmert III (2022-06-15) # Open security bug with patches for years. Upstream seems dead since # 2020. Removal on 2022-07-15. Bug #718550. sys-cluster/csync2 signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] About EGO_SUM

2022-06-09 Thread John Helmert III
On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 07:49:04PM +0200, Sebastian Pipping wrote: > On 08.06.22 22:42, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > EGO_SUM vs dependency tarballs: > > [..] > > - EGO_SUM is verifiable/reproducible from Upstream Go systems > > Let's be explicit, there is a _security_ threat here: as a user of an

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Security Bug Assignment Change

2022-04-23 Thread John Helmert III
On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 03:49:32PM +0300, Joonas Niilola wrote: > On 15.4.2022 4.38, John Helmert III wrote: > > Hi all! Currently all security bugs are assigned to security@g.o, > > always. This can easily lead to some confusion about who needs to do > > something about a

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] Security Bug Assignment Change

2022-04-14 Thread John Helmert III
Hi all! Currently all security bugs are assigned to security@g.o, always. This can easily lead to some confusion about who needs to do something about a given bug; right now this is generally tracked by whiteboard magic strings that probably not many people outside of the Security Project

Re: [gentoo-dev] proposal: use only one hash function in manifest files

2022-04-04 Thread John Helmert III
I don't really have any strong opinion, but I'll note this was discussed here last year, too: https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/a51ef62765b577dccfde67d5d2d727ae On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 01:41:50AM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to propose the following for

Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecating repoman

2022-03-10 Thread John Helmert III
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 04:53:10PM -0500, Joshua Kinard wrote: > On 3/10/2022 14:44, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > >>> > >>> I wouldn't block anyone from doing this, but it's not something I'm > >>> personally interested in pursuing. I see very little value here. > >> > >> First, you're trying to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecating repoman

2022-03-10 Thread John Helmert III
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 12:07:40PM -0600, William Hubbs wrote: > On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 09:29:59AM -0800, Matt Turner wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 11:09 PM Joonas Niilola wrote: > > > > > > On 9.3.2022 23.00, Matt Turner wrote: > > > > I'd like to deprecate and ultimately remove repoman. I

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: sys-apps/hwids

2021-12-24 Thread John Helmert III
On Sat, Dec 25, 2021 at 01:51:36AM -0500, Philip Webb wrote: > 211224 Mike Gilbert wrote: > > # Mike Gilbert (2021-12-24) > > # Replaced by sys-apps/hwdata. Removal on 2021-01-23. > > sys-apps/hwids > > It seems to be a requirement for my system : > > root:515 ~> emerge -cpv hwids >

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] mount-boot.eclass: support EAPI 8

2021-12-12 Thread John Helmert III
Signed-off-by: John Helmert III --- eclass/mount-boot.eclass | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/mount-boot.eclass b/eclass/mount-boot.eclass index 2b07160231a6..3111d9dcb9b5 100644 --- a/eclass/mount-boot.eclass +++ b/eclass/mount-boot.eclass @@ -4,7

[gentoo-dev] Re: Aisha's packages up for grabs

2021-11-21 Thread John Helmert III
On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 08:59:57AM +0200, Joonas Niilola wrote: > Hey, > > the following are up for grabs: > > acct-group/greetd > acct-user/greetd > gui-libs/greetd I'll take these. Very happy to comaintain if anyone else is interested, of course. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: mail-client/cone

2021-11-12 Thread John Helmert III
# John Helmert III (2021-11-13) # Unmaintained in Gentoo, open security bug, many unfixed otther # bugs. Removal on 2021-12-13, bug #764719. mail-client/cone signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-apps/websvn

2021-11-11 Thread John Helmert III
# John Helmert III (2021-11-12) # Unfixed code execution bug, unmaintained in Gentoo. # Removal on 2021-11-11, bugs #672352, #794511. www-apps/websvn signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-emulation/firecracker

2021-11-11 Thread John Helmert III
# John Helmert III (2021-11-11) # Unmaintained and vulnerable. # Removal on 2021-12-11. Bugs #735978, #794907 app-emulation/firecracker signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] You currently cannot smoothly upgrade a 4 months old Gentoo system

2021-11-03 Thread John Helmert III
On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 12:09:28AM +, Sam James wrote: > On 4 Nov 2021, at 00:02, Sam James wrote: > >> On 3 Nov 2021, at 23:53, Aaron Bauman wrote: > >> Is that where the policy belongs? > >> If so, shouldn't the council update it based on their decisions? > >> "patches are welcome" doesn't

Re: [gentoo-dev] You currently cannot smoothly upgrade a 4 months old Gentoo system

2021-11-03 Thread John Helmert III
On Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 05:51:49PM +0100, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > On 2021-11-03 17:44, John Helmert III wrote: > >> | Upgrade path for old systems > >> | > >> | Vote (unanimous): The ebuild tree must provide an upgrade path to a &g

Re: [gentoo-dev] You currently cannot smoothly upgrade a 4 months old Gentoo system

2021-11-03 Thread John Helmert III
On Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 05:34:16PM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > On Wed, 03 Nov 2021, Rich Freeman wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 11:03 AM Thomas Deutschmann > > wrote: > >> > >> This is not about finding solution to upgrade the system (in this case > >> it was enough to force

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] 2021-10-27-upgrade-to-net-news_rssguard-4_0: add news item

2021-10-27 Thread John Helmert III
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 10:53:10AM +0500, Anna Vyalkova wrote: > Signed-off-by: Anna Vyalkova > --- > Related to this version bump and unmask: > https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-proxy-maint/message/d86352b4ebad8c4ddd14fcd8ce37162f > > ...27-upgrade-to-net-news_rssguard-4_0.en.txt | 29

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Removing separate "security supported" arch list

2021-10-27 Thread John Helmert III
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 10:05:20AM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > Hello, > > Splitting from the discussion in [1] (moving more arhitectures to > ~arch), I'd like to propose that we remove the "security supported" > architecture list from [2] and instead level security support with > the general

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Moving more architectures to ~arch only

2021-10-17 Thread John Helmert III
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 02:25:47AM +0200, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > On 2021-10-14 15:40, Marek Szuba wrote: > > WDYT? > > Could you please elaborate what you are expecting from this change? > > I.e. will this solve any problem (please name it)? Will it allow us to > move forward where we are

Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilization Detached from Security Bugs

2021-08-27 Thread John Helmert III
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 08:58:35AM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > On Thu, 2021-08-26 at 19:11 -0500, John Helmert III wrote: > > In the past, stabilization for security bugs would be handled directly > > in that security bug. After some discussion on the gentoo-dev mail

[gentoo-dev] Stabilization Detached from Security Bugs

2021-08-26 Thread John Helmert III
Hi all, In the past, stabilization for security bugs would be handled directly in that security bug. After some discussion on the gentoo-dev mailing list [1], there was some consensus on modifying this workflow to separate stabilization from security bugs. Going forward, separate bugs should be

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/1] kernel-2.eclass: Add cpio dependency

2021-08-23 Thread John Helmert III
On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 06:55:57PM -0400, Mike wrote: > Add cpio dependency to kernel-2.eclass > > Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/731666 > > Signed-off-by: Mike Pagano > --- > eclass/kernel-2.eclass | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/eclass/kernel-2.eclass

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Decoupling stabilization from security bugs

2021-08-12 Thread John Helmert III
The benefits definitely seem to outweigh the added work here, sounds good to me! signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-portage/{deltup,getdelta}

2021-07-25 Thread John Helmert III
# John Helmert III (2021-07-26) # Open security bug, service backing it seems to be dead, making these # packages useless. Old EAPIs. Removal on 2021-08-26. Bug #630814 app-portage/getdelta app-portage/deltup signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-text/lout

2021-07-25 Thread John Helmert III
# John Helmert III (2021-07-26) # Maintained needed, open security bug, uninterested upstream. # No revdeps. Removal on 2021-08-26. Bug #752408. app-text/lout signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: dev-python/imread

2021-07-23 Thread John Helmert III
On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 07:42:48PM +0200, Dennis Lamm wrote: > Hello, > > Package up for grabs due to to no consumer in 3dprint project and other > portage package: > dev-python/imread > > It has 1 open bug and a version bump pending according to Repology. > > IMHO: this should be removed from

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2] bash-completion-r1.eclass: Add EAPI 8 support

2021-07-16 Thread John Helmert III
On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 05:33:24PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > Signed-off-by: Michał Górny > --- > eclass/bash-completion-r1.eclass | 13 + > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/eclass/bash-completion-r1.eclass > b/eclass/bash-completion-r1.eclass >

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-proxy/polipo

2021-07-14 Thread John Helmert III
# John Helmert III (2021-07-14) # Dead upstream, unfixed security issue. # Removal on 2021-08-13. Bugs #755896, #781467. net-proxy/polipo signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-misc/netkit-rsh

2021-06-19 Thread John Helmert III
# John Helmert III (2021-06-19) # Unmaintained, open security bug. # Removal on 2021-07-19. Bug #717794. net-misc/netkit-rsh signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] [pre-GLEP] Repository configuration file (layout.conf)

2021-05-20 Thread John Helmert III
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 02:32:27PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, > > Please review the pre-GLEP inlined below. Its purpose is to formally > define the format of layout.conf. It's pretty much inevitable these > days, so we should specify it. However, it doesn't really fit into PMS, > and

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs: innoextract, emech, tigervnc, urxvtconfig

2021-02-21 Thread John Helmert III
On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 03:54:39PM +0200, Joonas Niilola wrote: > Hey, > > here are some packages up-for-grabs due to retirement of their maintainers. > b = bugs open, v = version bump available. > > app-arch/innoextract > net-irc/emech (b) > net-misc/tigervnc (b) Note that this one has a

Re: [gentoo-dev] GTK:2 EOL and incoming migration to GTK:3

2021-02-08 Thread John Helmert III
On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 02:59:45PM +, Peter Stuge wrote: > Hanno Böck wrote: > > > "It does mean, however, that GTK 2 has reached the end of its life. > > > We will do one final 2.x release in the coming days, and we encourage > > > everybody to port their GTK 2 applications to GTK 3 or 4." >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Discontinuing LibreSSL support?

2020-12-29 Thread John Helmert III
On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 02:57:12PM +0100, m1027 wrote: > > > On 29 Dec 2020, at 09:13, Marcel Schilling > > > wrote: > > > > > > I just want to comment that I switched to LibreSSL on several > > > Gentoo systems years ago and never had any major issues. I run > > > both desktop and server

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] profiles/targets/desktop: Do not enable ldap USE flag by default

2020-09-10 Thread John Helmert III
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 11:59:31AM +0300, Mikle Kolyada wrote: > > On 10.09.2020 08:35, Hans de Graaff wrote: > > On Wed, 2020-09-09 at 13:35 +0300, Mikle Kolyada wrote: > >> Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/741380 > > Could you provide a rationale for removing this? The bug only has a > > single

Re: [gentoo-dev] Crypto/GPG-related packages up for grabs

2020-09-07 Thread John Helmert III
On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 07:44:33PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, > > The following packages are up for grabs due to their maintainer being > MIA. > > acct-group/monkeysphere > acct-user/monkeysphere > app-crypt/ekeyd > app-crypt/monkeysphere > app-crypt/nasty > app-crypt/pinentry >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Bug #733802, USE 'scp' now defaults to off in net-misc/openssh

2020-07-25 Thread John Helmert III
On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 08:05:14PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 7:40 PM Joshua Kinard wrote: > > > > This seems like something that needs a news entry, or > > at least a "heads up" on the mailing list? > > Definitely not a "heads up" on the mailing list - that is not an >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last-rites: dev-util/cutter

2020-07-24 Thread John Helmert III
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 02:06:56PM +0300, Joonas Niilola wrote: > # Unmaintained in Gentoo, broken, multiple bugs open. > # Removal in ~30 days. #733324 Hi, I've opened a PR to take this. The newest version fixes the build issue present with the version we have in-tree and it seems that like most

Re: [gentoo-dev] */*: Mask Py2 only packages

2020-06-25 Thread John Helmert III
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 07:32:04AM -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 2020-06-24 16:08, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > $ git grep -l mgo...@gentoo.org '**/metadata.xml' | cut -d/ -f1-2 | > > xargs gpy-py2 2>/dev/null > > > > The big problem with this is that it misses any aliases (like graphics@)

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Anti-spam for goose

2020-05-22 Thread John Helmert III
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 12:53:03PM -0700, Brian Dolbec wrote: > We cannot exclude overlays which will have cat/pkg not in the main > gentoo repo. So, we should not excludea submission that includes a few > of these. To avoid this problem, even if imperfectly, it should be possible to track what

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item v2: Python 3.7 to become the default target

2020-04-21 Thread John Helmert III
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 07:56:16AM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > Display-If-Installed: dev-lang/python:3.6 > > On 2020-05-06 (or later), Python 3.7 will replace Python 3.6 as one > of the default Python targets for Gentoo systems. The new default > values will be: > >