On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 08:26:15AM +0200, Joonas Niilola wrote: > On 7.11.2022 8.07, Oskari Pirhonen wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 06, 2022 at 11:37:24 +0100, Piotr Karbowski wrote: > >> I would be in favour of stepping up the social contract and actually > >> prohibiting this kind of things, we had that before too, the nattka you > >> mgorny wrote is replacement for old bugzilla bot that was ... > >> closedsource and perished, though nattka now have way more features than > >> the old thing ever had. > > > > As a user, I think it would be really cool if there was a requirement > > that all infra and infra-adjacent stuff was free software. > > > > I feel like I've read that Debian already has something like this. While > > doing some quick searches I didn't find a full-on requirement, but all > > their infra bits I did find were powered by free software. The most > > relevant ones being buildd [1] and debci [2]. Additionally, the debci > > docs has inctructions on reproducing tests yourself [3] which is a nice > > extra IMO. > > > > [1] https://buildd.debian.org > > [2] https://ci.debian.net > > [3] https://ci.debian.net/doc/file.MAINTAINERS.html > > > > - Oskari > > I _believe_ ago's tinderbox isn't being paid by the GF _anymore_ due to > this reason, but he keeps it running with his own expenses. I don't mind > this as long as the results are desirable and not phony. I still see a > lot of value in most of ago's work.
He's not using infra's AWS resources anymore, but he's still using the devbox.amd64.dev.gentoo.org VM. > It is unfortunate we don't get to see the engine behind and copy it, > since I'd be really interested in using his automated bug search / > report tool. Even tattoo (https://github.com/arthurzam/tattoo) lacks > that at the moment. > > -- juippis
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
