[gentoo-dev] links between anoncvs.g.o and sources.g.o

2008-12-20 Thread Jonas Bernoulli
Hi May I suggest that you add links so that anoncvs.g.o and sources.g.o link to one another. Users might find one of those pages and think that's all there is to it. However both of the pages contain information not available on the other. anoncvs.g.o mentions git and rsync, and sources.g.o allow

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: bzr.eclass into Portage

2008-10-05 Thread Jonas Bernoulli
bazaar DSCM (distributed source control management system). # The eclass was originally derived from the git eclass. +# Shared repository support added by Jonas Bernoulli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. # # Note: Just set EBZR_REPO_URI to the url of the branch and the src_unpack # this eclass provide

Re: [gentoo-dev] new portage categories

2008-02-04 Thread Jonas Bernoulli
On 2/4/08, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 20:11 Mon 04 Feb , Jonas Bernoulli wrote: > > Thinking about it again I would say tags and categories just fulfill > > different purposes. Tags can not replace categories but might be a > > useful extension

Re: [gentoo-dev] new portage categories

2008-02-04 Thread Jonas Bernoulli
On 2/4/08, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sounds like what you really want are tags, not categories ... Yes and no. tags would definitely be better than subcategories. But for some packages a new category would probably still make sense like app-scm ( http://www.mail-archive.com/ge

[gentoo-dev] new portage categories

2008-02-04 Thread Jonas Bernoulli
Hello Recently I started to exclude parts of the portage tree for various reasons. One of them is that I play with the thought of creating my own minidistro/livecd based on Gentoo. So keep in mind that I don't think that it is in general useful to trim the portage tree to the extend that I have.