Re: [gentoo-dev] coordination on JetBrains IDEs?

2021-08-04 Thread Mathy Vanvoorden
bbling together an updated ebuild for Webstorm. -- Met vriendelijke groeten, Best regards, Mathy Vanvoorden

Re: [gentoo-dev] Value of Continuous integration vs Code Review / Pull Requests

2020-06-03 Thread Mathy Vanvoorden
Op di 2 jun. 2020 om 19:51 schreef Alec Warner : > > The conclusion was that the software needed to be released under an open > license (preferably FSF / OSI approved.) So for example, Gitlab CE is OK > (its an OSI approved licensed) but Gitlab EE is not. The source for Gitlab > EE is open (I can

Re: [gentoo-dev] Value of Continuous integration vs Code Review / Pull Requests

2020-06-02 Thread Mathy Vanvoorden
Op di 2 jun. 2020 om 10:47 schreef Michał Górny : > 1. This is not free software. > It was not clear for me if this was a requirement or not. The license is free for open source projects. I don't see the difference between companies offering CE versions of their commercial products, they also

Re: [gentoo-dev] Value of Continuous integration vs Code Review / Pull Requests

2020-06-02 Thread Mathy Vanvoorden
Hi, Sorry I'm a bit late to the party here but was behind on my emails. Op wo 27 mei 2020 om 05:25 schreef Alec Warner : > The TL;DR is that a crack team of infra-folks[0] have been putting > together demos of CI services and things like gitlab / gitea / gerrit and > so on. > > I didn't see in

Re: [gentoo-dev] Migrate away from python-2 or not

2019-11-29 Thread Mathy Vanvoorden
> I tried removing python2 on a handful of test systems over the last week > ... it's back everywhere. > > I attempted the same over the last couple of days as I was thinking "It's going anyway, why not get a head start?". I had to do the following: * Remove metagen * Remove rr * Update kodi and

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] multiversion ebuilds

2018-05-15 Thread Mathy Vanvoorden
2018-05-12 14:20 GMT+02:00 Gerion Entrup : just an idea for now. But what you think about multiversion ebuilds? > Technically this could be realized with the following line in the ebuild > itself: > ``` > VERSIONS=( 3.0.11 3.0.12 3.1 ) > ``` > I like the idea of

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Update bitcoin eclass to default to knots

2017-03-08 Thread Mathy Vanvoorden
> I don't have time nor the familiarity to properly maintain bitcoins > myself. Every time Luke wants to make a change, I get nothing but > negative advice - what not to do, but not what to do. If there were an > unpopular package I would just drop it to maintainer-needed. But do we > really

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Update bitcoin eclass to default to knots

2017-03-06 Thread Mathy Vanvoorden
2017-03-06 15:53 GMT+01:00 Anthony G. Basile : > Bitcoin Knots includes a number of enhancements users may find useful. I > think it would be a good idea to make it the default for Bitcoin > ebuilds (net-p2p/bitcoin-qt, net-p2p/bitcoind, and dev-util/bitcoin-tx). > As a

Re: [gentoo-dev] New Project: Gentoostats

2017-01-02 Thread Mathy Vanvoorden
If you need a hand testing, let me know, I'm willing to run it on my box. -- Met vriendelijke groeten, Best regards, Mathy Vanvoorden 2017-01-02 18:27 GMT+01:00 Gokturk Yuksek <gokt...@gentoo.org>: > Alexander Shorin: > > Hi! > > > > Thanks for sharing. Would be n

Re: [gentoo-dev] Request for help: distributed pull request CI (pkgcheck)

2016-12-07 Thread Mathy Vanvoorden
Hi, I have some experience with CI and am willing to help out, I'll talk to you on IRC. Mathy On Dec 7, 2016 19:57, "Michał Górny" wrote: > Hello, everyone. > > TL;DR: I'm looking for some help to get pull-request CI running > distributed, i.e. on multiple hosts. > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2016-11-25 Thread Mathy Vanvoorden
> > AFAIK they are not intended to be installed as compiled code at all. > You are supposed to bundle them, or otherwise compile them from sources > along with your project. > > You are correct, apparently they changed their stance on this some time ago as you can read here:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2016-11-25 Thread Mathy Vanvoorden
Hi, I use them so I don't mind (proxy) maintaining them. gr, Mathy -- Met vriendelijke groeten, Best regards, Mathy Vanvoorden 2016-11-25 16:06 GMT+01:00 Thomas Kahle <to...@gentoo.org>: > Hi, > > I'd like to pass on maintainership of > > dev-cpp/gtest > dev-cpp/gm

[gentoo-dev] Re: Proposal to fix distutils_install_for_testing to install proper egg-info

2016-11-14 Thread Mathy Vanvoorden
This was merged to master by mgorny in commit 733fbcdcf08b74153bb6c3786e8f79ba031cb339 -- Met vriendelijke groeten, Best regards, Mathy Vanvoorden 2016-11-09 10:13 GMT+01:00 Mathy Vanvoorden <ma...@vanvoorden.be>: > Hi, > > As requested in this PR I submit this patch to gentoo

[gentoo-dev] Proposal to fix distutils_install_for_testing to install proper egg-info

2016-11-09 Thread Mathy Vanvoorden
-Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=524322 -- Met vriendelijke groeten, Best regards, Mathy Vanvoorden From 5a073983287a8fa097c5fbc60826e49aef45004b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mathy Vanvoorden <ma...@vanvoorden.be> Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2016 00:01:51 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] distut