On 12/20/2017 06:17 PM, Nils Freydank wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 20. Dezember 2017, 17:48:54 CET schrieb kuzetsa:
>> On 12/16/2017 10:14 AM, Nils Freydank wrote:
>>> Am Dienstag, 5. Dezember 2017, 23:41:45 CET schrieb kuzetsa:
On 12/05/2017 05:18 PM, Nils Freydank wrote:
> 5. Reasons for warnin
On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
> According to Merriam-Webster:
>
> self-evident
> adjective | self-ev·i·dent | ˌself-ˈe-və-dənt , -ˌdent
> evident without proof or reasoning
>
The version I used is taken from http://dd.pangyre.org/s/self-evident.html.
> You have been
On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Nils Freydank wrote:
> There is a specific RFC about splitting the mailing list because of a
> problematic style of conversation.
>
Well, yes - but what is problematic? Certain parties keep vaguely
alluding to past actions, which is what I am inquiring about.
>
Am Mittwoch, 20. Dezember 2017, 17:48:54 CET schrieb kuzetsa:
> On 12/16/2017 10:14 AM, Nils Freydank wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 5. Dezember 2017, 23:41:45 CET schrieb kuzetsa:
> >> On 12/05/2017 05:18 PM, Nils Freydank wrote:
> >>> 5. Reasons for warnings and bans
> >>> --
On 12/16/2017 10:14 AM, Nils Freydank wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 5. Dezember 2017, 23:41:45 CET schrieb kuzetsa:
>> On 12/05/2017 05:18 PM, Nils Freydank wrote:
>>> 5. Reasons for warnings and bans
>>>
>> --snip--
>>
>>> c) spamming, i.e. flooding discussions with lots o
Am Dienstag, 5. Dezember 2017, 23:41:45 CET schrieb kuzetsa:
> On 12/05/2017 05:18 PM, Nils Freydank wrote:
> > 5. Reasons for warnings and bans
> >
>
> --snip--
>
> > c) spamming, i.e. flooding discussions with lots of messages in a row
> > d) constant postings o
Am Freitag, 15. Dezember 2017, 17:59:59 CET schrieb Anton Molyboha:
> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 5:18 PM, Nils Freydank wrote:
> > [snip]
> >
> >
> >
> > 3. Moderation
> > -
> > The moderation team has to consist of at least two developers. The
> > moderators
> > have to do join the mod
Am Freitag, 15. Dezember 2017, 23:37:48 CET schrieb R0b0t1:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Nils Freydank wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > with regards to the current mailing list (ML) split discussion, and one
> > specific message deep down there by mgorny asked for someone provi
On 2017-12-15 16:37, R0b0t1 wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Nils Freydank wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > with regards to the current mailing list (ML) split discussion, and one
> > specific message deep down there by mgorny asked for someone providing
> > moderator rules,
Hello,
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Nils Freydank wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> with regards to the current mailing list (ML) split discussion, and one
> specific message deep down there by mgorny asked for someone providing
> moderator rules, I would like to propose the following ruleset for g
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 5:18 PM, Nils Freydank wrote:
> [snip]
>
> 3. Moderation
> -
> The moderation team has to consist of at least two developers. The
> moderators
> have to do join the moderation team voluntarily.
>
> "have to do join" should probably be "have to join"
> [snip]
On 12/05/2017 05:18 PM, Nils Freydank wrote:
> 5. Reasons for warnings and bans
>
--snip--
> c) spamming, i.e. flooding discussions with lots of messages in a row
> d) constant postings off topic, i.e. disrupting discussions with unrelated
> questions
> (co
Hello everyone,
with regards to the current mailing list (ML) split discussion, and one
specific message deep down there by mgorny asked for someone providing
moderator rules, I would like to propose the following ruleset for gentoo-dev
Right now the situation escalated in a way that forces to
13 matches
Mail list logo
