On Saturday 27 August 2005 03:38 pm, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
On Sat, 2005-08-27 at 15:11 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 27 August 2005 02:58 pm, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
Which reminds me .. anybody going to scream if I update elibtoolize()
to be able to check if it was already
On Sun, 2005-08-28 at 01:59 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 27 August 2005 03:38 pm, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
On Sat, 2005-08-27 at 15:11 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 27 August 2005 02:58 pm, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
Which reminds me .. anybody going to scream if I
On Sunday 28 August 2005 07:28 am, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
On Sun, 2005-08-28 at 01:59 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 27 August 2005 03:38 pm, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
On Sat, 2005-08-27 at 15:11 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 27 August 2005 02:58 pm, Martin Schlemmer
On Sun, 2005-08-28 at 12:50 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sunday 28 August 2005 07:28 am, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
On Sun, 2005-08-28 at 01:59 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 27 August 2005 03:38 pm, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
On Sat, 2005-08-27 at 15:11 -0400, Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 28 August 2005 01:43 pm, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
On Sun, 2005-08-28 at 12:50 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sunday 28 August 2005 07:28 am, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
On Sun, 2005-08-28 at 01:59 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 27 August 2005 03:38 pm, Martin Schlemmer
On Sun, 2005-08-28 at 13:54 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sunday 28 August 2005 01:43 pm, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
On Sun, 2005-08-28 at 12:50 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sunday 28 August 2005 07:28 am, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
On Sun, 2005-08-28 at 01:59 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
I was wondering last night with az about the handling of autotools.
They not always require to be re-run by scratch, but when you have to run
aclocal you usually have to run everything after that.
Every ebuild handles them in a different way, some ebuilds run them in a
list and then || die,
On Sat, 2005-08-27 at 14:00 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
I was wondering last night with az about the handling of autotools.
They not always require to be re-run by scratch, but when you have to run
aclocal you usually have to run everything after that.
Every ebuild handles them in
On Sat, 2005-08-27 at 16:24 +0200, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
On Sat, 2005-08-27 at 14:00 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
I was wondering last night with az about the handling of autotools.
They not always require to be re-run by scratch, but when you have to run
aclocal you usually
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 04:24:40PM +0200, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
I still think a autoreconf is usually enough, except for cases where
that do not work,
And what is not work in this case?
- fails with an error so it's impossible to miss as a dev, or
- fails to do things properly, causing
On Sat, 27 Aug 2005 14:00:06 +0200 Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Attached there's an autotools eclass, it's basically a way to give
| more information to the user while providing an epatch-like die
| message. the eauto* calls are directly calls to the original command,
|
On Saturday 27 August 2005 17:53, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
I don't like it. It removes the ability to DEPEND (which you spelt
wrong, btw) upon the correct auto* version.
Yeah I know I typoed.
About the version.. well you just can't depend upon a specified version
anyway.
When you depend on
On Sat, 27 Aug 2005 18:05:19 +0200 Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Saturday 27 August 2005 17:53, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| I don't like it. It removes the ability to DEPEND (which you spelt
| wrong, btw) upon the correct auto* version.
| Yeah I know I typoed.
| About the
On Saturday 27 August 2005 18:11, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
The circular autothing - wrapper dependency will be phased out at
some point in the future once all auto* deps properly specify versions.
The aim is to remove the need to install certain obscure auto* slots
that are becoming rarer and
On Sat, 2005-08-27 at 17:51 +0200, Maurice van der Pot wrote:
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 04:24:40PM +0200, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
I still think a autoreconf is usually enough, except for cases where
that do not work,
And what is not work in this case?
- fails with an error so it's
On Saturday 27 August 2005 08:00 am, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
eautoreconf() {
local aclocal_opts
[[ -n ${M4DIR} ]] aclocal_opts=-I ${M4DIR}
eaclocal $aclocal_opts
eautoconf
eautoheader
eautomake
gnuconfig_update
On Sat, 2005-08-27 at 14:37 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 27 August 2005 08:00 am, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
eautoreconf() {
local aclocal_opts
[[ -n ${M4DIR} ]] aclocal_opts=-I ${M4DIR}
eaclocal $aclocal_opts
eautoconf
On Saturday 27 August 2005 02:58 pm, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
On Sat, 2005-08-27 at 14:37 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 27 August 2005 08:00 am, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
eautoreconf() {
local aclocal_opts
[[ -n ${M4DIR} ]] aclocal_opts=-I ${M4DIR}
On Sat, 2005-08-27 at 15:11 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 27 August 2005 02:58 pm, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
On Sat, 2005-08-27 at 14:37 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 27 August 2005 08:00 am, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
eautoreconf() {
local
19 matches
Mail list logo
