Mike Frysinger wrote:
we should really rename build to stage1, bootstrap to stage2, and
then have catalyst add USE=stage3 during the stage3 step ... that would
allow packages to automatically key off of the environment
That sounds clean too. You could use install to make the transition
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 17:45 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
the compromise is simple: catalyst runs --config at the end of stage3 for
appropriate packages, but as to what those things actually do is left in
the ebuilds.
I've already stated my preference for not doing
On Sat, 2007-09-22 at 08:01 +0100, Steve Long wrote:
I've already stated my preference for not doing *anything* outside of
merging packages in the stages.
With respect, this is a little confusing. I didn't get past the learning
curve for catalyst, but it's clearly not the same as simply
On Friday 21 September 2007, Duncan wrote:
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Thu, 20 Sep
2007 12:34:41 -0400:
we know that someone taking a stage3 has never configured anything
before and so we can safely put defaults into /root/.
Just to
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 21 Sep
2007 03:16:49 -0400:
On Friday 21 September 2007, Duncan wrote:
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Thu, 20 Sep
2007 12:34:41 -0400:
we know that someone
On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 04:23 +, Duncan wrote:
Just to point out... I've seen people mention overlaying a stage-3 on an
existing installation for recovery reasons, generally broken gcc or (on
amd64) switching back to multilib from 64-bit only profiles, so it
/cannot/ be rightly assumed
John R. Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Thu, 20 Sep 2007 07:18:46 -0400:
But, hasn't anyone realized that bash is _broken_ if this file doesn't
exist? Quoting from the upstream-provided man page, When an
interactive shell that is not a login shell is
Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Thu,
20 Sep 2007 09:19:31 -0700:
While I would normally agree, there's nothing wrong with having sensible
defaults. After all, we install a bunch of stuff into /home/$user
thanks to /etc/skel, so how is this
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Thu, 20 Sep
2007 12:34:41 -0400:
we know that someone taking a stage3 has never configured anything
before and so we can safely put defaults into /root/.
Just to point out... I've seen people mention overlaying a
