On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 05:42:19PM -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> We now have IUSE="+cracklib" in sys-apps/shadow, sys-auth/pambase, and
> sys-libs/pam (thanks robbat2).
>
> Does that address everyone's concerns?
>
> Enough so that I can revert the revert without anyone reverting the
> revert
We now have IUSE="+cracklib" in sys-apps/shadow, sys-auth/pambase, and
sys-libs/pam (thanks robbat2).
Does that address everyone's concerns?
Enough so that I can revert the revert without anyone reverting the
revert revert?
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Nils Freydank wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 27. Dezember 2017, 22:33:03 CET schrieb R0b0t1:
>> On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 10:32 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
>> > As he said, he contactedd the maintainers in ample time, so I would say
Am Mittwoch, 27. Dezember 2017, 22:33:03 CET schrieb R0b0t1:
> On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 10:32 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > As he said, he contactedd the maintainers in ample time, so I would say
> > that since they didn't respond he went ahead in good faith. I'll get the
> >
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 10:32 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> As he said, he contactedd the maintainers in ample time, so I would say
> that since they didn't respond he went ahead in good faith. I'll get the
> link later, but as I recall, the dev manual recommends a 2-4 week wait
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 05:42:04PM +0200, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> On K, 2017-12-27 at 09:57 -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> > > 2) What you plan to do to have USE=cracklib enabled by default. Two
> > > people suggested you should keep this (one way or another) but
> > instead
> > > everyone is now
On 12/27/2017 10:42 AM, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> If you want to make such a base profile change, then I believe you
> should contact the maintainers and see which one wants it default
> disabled, and which default enabled; do the default enabled changes
> and only afterwards you can touch a base
On K, 2017-12-27 at 09:57 -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> > 2) What you plan to do to have USE=cracklib enabled by default. Two
> > people suggested you should keep this (one way or another) but
> instead
> > everyone is now without it enabled by default.
>
> I plan to do nothing, because I
On 12/27/2017 05:49 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> OK, let me explain again.
>
> In #gentoo we give a lot of attention and support to people who want to
> set up full disk encryption, tor, VPNs, and other security mechanisms,
> and this tells me that they actually want security. By saying that "some
On Fri, 22 Dec 2017 12:30:35 -0500
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 12/21/2017 02:27 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> > On Thu, 21 Dec 2017 10:10:30 -0500
> > Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> >
> >> The "cracklib" USE flag ... this commit removes it from
> >>
On 12/21/2017 02:27 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Dec 2017 10:10:30 -0500
> Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>
>> The "cracklib" USE flag ... this commit removes it from base/make.defaults.
>>
>> Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/635698
>
> As there:
>> ...
>
> Let me (easily)
On Thu, 21 Dec 2017 10:10:30 -0500
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> The "cracklib" USE flag has long (since 2007ish) been enabled by
> default for all profiles. But, the features that it provides are not
> critical for any of the packages that use it: typically, the library
> is used
12 matches
Mail list logo