Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > dev-python/hachoir-core > dev-python/hachoir-parser > dev-python/hachoir-regex > dev-python/pycountry > dev-python/pywebdav I think the python herd will take these. Cheers, Dirkjan

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/02/2013 07:02 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > Due c1pher lack of time the following packages are now up for grabs: > net-analyzer/ostinato > net-wireless/mdk I'll take these. - -Zero -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Co

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On 06/02/2013 07:02 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: Due c1pher lack of time the following packages are now up for grabs: app-benchmarks/ramspeed I'm the last person to have done some maintenance on ramspeed. I can take care of it. -- Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] E-Mail

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Sat, 23 Mar 2013 10:52:00 +0100 Martin Dummer wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > If I manage one day to achieve the gentoo dev status then I am willing > to pick up maintainership of > > > app-laptop/nvidiabl > > but

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Sat, 23 Mar 2013 10:52:00 +0100 Martin Dummer wrote: > If I manage one day to achieve the gentoo dev status then I am willing > to pick up maintainership of > > > app-laptop/nvidiabl > > but until then? What about proxy-maintainership? Luis signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 If I manage one day to achieve the gentoo dev status then I am willing to pick up maintainership of > app-laptop/nvidiabl but until then? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

On 02/16/2013 08:08 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: Due pva lack of time the following packages are now up for grabs: net-firewall/xtables-addons (proxy maintained) net-misc/ipv6calc I can take care of these two. I use both. -- Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] E-Mail: bl

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

Am Samstag, 16. Februar 2013, 14:08:06 schrieb Pacho Ramos: > Due pva lack of time the following packages are now up for grabs: > app-emulation/e-uae > app-emulation/uae AFAIK both are long dead. The current actively developed uae variant is PUAE, but I'd say it is not ready for a wider audience

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

Peter Stuge schrieb: > linux-firmware is okey but not great. The high resolution is there, which was > my main concern, but it's not so easy to know how to create a savedconfig without installing the package. Just create a text file /etc/portage/savedconfig/sys-kernel/linux-firmware with the desi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

Diego Elio Pettenò schrieb: > On 16/02/2013 14:08, Pacho Ramos wrote: >> sys-firmware/iwl3945-ucode >> sys-firmware/iwl4965-ucode > > Are these included in linux-firmware (i.e. could we just remove them) or > not? These are included in linux-firmware. And because Intel has EOL'ed the chipsets, it

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 12:09:22 +0200 Samuli Suominen wrote: > On 17/02/13 12:05, Michał Górny wrote: > > savedconfig is a cheap hack. It lacks all the features USE flags have. > > Really. We're talking here about replacing well-organized packages with > > one cheap hack for the laziness of a few de

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

On 17/02/13 12:05, Michał Górny wrote: savedconfig is a cheap hack. It lacks all the features USE flags have. Really. We're talking here about replacing well-organized packages with one cheap hack for the laziness of a few developers. But that's how Gentoo worked for a long time. This is how yo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 00:06:19 -0500 "Rick \"Zero_Chaos\" Farina" wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 02/16/2013 10:11 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > Can we please stop removing individual firmware packages until > > sys-k

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/16/2013 10:11 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> On Sat, 16 Feb 2013, Diego Elio Petten￲ wrote: > >> On 16/02/2013 15:41, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote: >>> >>> Yup, we sure can remove them, and if no one beat me to it I will do >>> that now. >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

On 2013-02-16 Sat 05:08, Pacho Ramos wrote: Due pva lack of time the following packages are now up for grabs: net-libs/libmnl Added to netmon herd. Tim pgpHn4U3M2RcW.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > Look into the WHENCE file and be horrified. Taking just the first ten > items (of a total 114): > >Unknown license (3 times) >GPL, but without source (3 times) >"All rights reserved" >BSD, without source >Right for redis

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

> On Sat, 16 Feb 2013, Mike Gilbert wrote: > I'm sure I'm not the only one who really doesn't care about having > ACCEPT_LICENSE work properly for a package full of binary blobs. It > seems like a rather insignificant reason to split the package up. Nobody has suggested to split it up. But un

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> On Sat, 16 Feb 2013, Rick \"Zero Chaos\" Farina wrote: > >>> Huh? Savedconfig isn't a solution for the license issue. > >> If he doesn't agree to the license he can use savedconfig to not >> install those firmware packages. > > Yes, bu

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

> On Sat, 16 Feb 2013, Rick \"Zero Chaos\" Farina wrote: >> Huh? Savedconfig isn't a solution for the license issue. > If he doesn't agree to the license he can use savedconfig to not > install those firmware packages. Yes, but ACCEPT_LICENSE wouldn't work. It would still be necessary to inc

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > > Please don't. I think it would suck to lose the higher resolution. > > Use savedconfig linux-firmware is okey but not great. The high resolution is there, which was my main concern, but it's not so easy to know how to create a savedconfig without installing the packa

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

On 16/02/2013 16:08, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > Huh? Savedconfig isn't a solution for the license issue. Which Peter's remark is not about. I do feel we need to fix the license issue, but I don't think this is compounding anything to clear up the tree first. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flame

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/16/2013 10:08 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> On Sat, 16 Feb 2013, Diego Elio Petten￲ wrote: > >>> Please don't. I think it would suck to lose the higher resolution. > >> Use savedconfig and stop wasting our collective time for your >> persona

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

> On Sat, 16 Feb 2013, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > On 16/02/2013 15:41, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote: >> >> Yup, we sure can remove them, and if no one beat me to it I will do >> that now. > Go for it. Please don't. Can we please stop removing individual firmware packages until sys-kerne

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

> On Sat, 16 Feb 2013, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: >> Please don't. I think it would suck to lose the higher resolution. > Use savedconfig and stop wasting our collective time for your > personal lazyness. Huh? Savedconfig isn't a solution for the license issue. Ulrich

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

On 16/02/2013 15:41, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote: > > Yup, we sure can remove them, and if no one beat me to it I will do that > now. Go for it. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/16/2013 08:44 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > On 16/02/2013 14:08, Pacho Ramos wrote: >> sys-firmware/iwl3945-ucode >> sys-firmware/iwl4965-ucode > > Are these included in linux-firmware (i.e. could we just remove them) or > not? > ozzie firmw

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

El mié, 06-02-2013 a las 18:17 +0800, Dennis Lan (dlan) escribió: > Hi ALL: > I'd like to help with following packages (will proxy via tomka) > > dev-libs/libev >which I see one open bug, but trivial to fix #429526 > > net-misc/ofono >need version bump (current 1.10, upstream release 1.1

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

On 16/02/2013 14:59, Peter Stuge wrote: > Please don't. I think it would suck to lose the higher resolution. Use savedconfig and stop wasting our collective time for your personal lazyness. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ signature.asc Desc

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

On 16/02/13 15:59, Peter Stuge wrote: Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: sys-firmware/iwl3945-ucode I want this installed on my system. sys-firmware/iwl4965-ucode But not this. could we just remove them Please don't. I think it would suck to lose the higher resolution. Having separate ebuil

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > > sys-firmware/iwl3945-ucode I want this installed on my system. > > sys-firmware/iwl4965-ucode But not this. > could we just remove them Please don't. I think it would suck to lose the higher resolution. On the plus side it seems that these particular packages w

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

On 16/02/2013 14:08, Pacho Ramos wrote: > sys-firmware/iwl3945-ucode > sys-firmware/iwl4965-ucode Are these included in linux-firmware (i.e. could we just remove them) or not? -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ signature.asc Description: OpenP

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

On Saturday 16 February 2013 14:08:06 Pacho Ramos wrote: > Due pva lack of time the following packages are now up for grabs: > app-dicts/stardict-freedict-eng-rus > app-doc/gimp-help > app-emulation/e-uae > app-emulation/uae > app-text/cuneiform (proxy maintained) > app-text/mathtex > app-text/yagf

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

On Sat, 16 Feb 2013 14:08:06 +0100 Pacho Ramos wrote: > dev-util/oprofile Took this one, bumped the version and did some small fixes. With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D signature.asc Description: PGP signatu

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

Hi ALL: I'd like to help with following packages (will proxy via tomka) dev-libs/libev which I see one open bug, but trivial to fix #429526 net-misc/ofono need version bump (current 1.10, upstream release 1.12) If any developer willing to hel

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

On Mon, 04 Feb 2013 09:16:32 +0800 Patrick Lauer wrote: > On 02/03/2013 09:45 PM, Ralph Sennhauser wrote: > > On Sun, 03 Feb 2013 13:46:52 +0100 > > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > > >> dev-libs/boehm-gc > > > > Will take this one in a few days if no one else grabs it first. > > > Since it's a depende

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

On 13:46 Sun 03 Feb 2013, Pacho Ramos wrote: > Due matsuu lack of time the following packages are up for grabs: > dev-cpp/gtest I'll take this one. Cheers, Thomas -- Thomas Kahle http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 02/03/2013 02:27 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > Due leio lack of time the following packages are up for grabs: > app-benchmarks/gtkperf mine. just fixed https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428652 - -- Michael Weber Gentoo Developer web: https://

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

El mar, 05-02-2013 a las 19:28 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: [...] > media-sound/dbmeasure [...] Ford Prefect will still take care of this one signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

On 5 February 2013 23:58, Pacho Ramos wrote: [...] > media-sound/dbmeasure [...] I'll keep this one. Cheers, -- Arun Raghavan http://arunraghavan.net/ (Ford_Prefect | Gentoo) & (arunsr | GNOME)

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs for dagger lack of time

On 5 February 2013 12:57, Pacho Ramos wrote: > sys-apps/paludis I'll take this one (paludis) (currently at work, can't edit metadata for ~7 hours)

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

03.02.2013 16:46, Pacho Ramos wrote: > dev-libs/confuse I will pick up this one. I use it in one of my projects -- Best regards, Sergey Popov Gentoo Linux Developer Desktop-effects project lead signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 02/03/2013 09:56 PM, Tim Harder wrote: > On 2013-02-03 Sun 04:46, Pacho Ramos wrote: >> net-dns/ldns-utils net-dns/unbound net-libs/ldns > > I'll help maintain these. > > Tim @Tim: you can add me there, too. Michael - -- Michael Weber Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

On 02/04/2013 09:54 AM, Theo Chatzimichos wrote: > On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Matthew Thode > wrote: >> On 02/03/2013 01:18 PM, Matthew Thode wrote: >>> On 02/03/2013 12:46 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: Due matsuu lack of time the following packages are up for grabs: app-admin/augeas

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Matthew Thode wrote: > On 02/03/2013 01:18 PM, Matthew Thode wrote: >> On 02/03/2013 12:46 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: >>> Due matsuu lack of time the following packages are up for grabs: >>> app-admin/augeas >>> app-admin/puppet >>> dev-ml/ocaml-augeas >>> dev-python/py

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 02/03/2013 12:44 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > Due tester lack of time the following packages are up for grabs: > app-admin/tmpreaper mine. - -- Michael Weber Gentoo Developer web: https://xmw.de/ mailto: Michael Weber -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

On 02/03/2013 09:45 PM, Ralph Sennhauser wrote: > On Sun, 03 Feb 2013 13:46:52 +0100 > Pacho Ramos wrote: > >> dev-libs/boehm-gc > > Will take this one in a few days if no one else grabs it first. > Since it's a dependency of one package I maintain (dev-lang/opendylan) I have a marginal interes

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

On 2013-02-03 Sun 04:46, Pacho Ramos wrote: net-dns/ldns-utils net-dns/unbound net-libs/ldns I'll help maintain these. Tim pgpVlqSDEz0M6.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 5:28 AM, Matthew Thode wrote: > On 02/03/2013 01:18 PM, Matthew Thode wrote: >> On 02/03/2013 12:46 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: >>> Due matsuu lack of time the following packages are up for grabs: >>> app-admin/augeas >>> app-admin/puppet >>> dev-ml/ocaml-augeas >>> dev-python/py

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

On 03/02/13 13:44, Pacho Ramos wrote: Due tester lack of time the following packages are up for grabs: media-libs/libgpod this should have been under the pda herd all along, i'll add the missing herd to metadata.xml thanks!

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

Le dimanche 03 février 2013 à 12:44 +0100, Pacho Ramos a écrit : > Due tester lack of time the following packages are up for grabs: > app-dicts/verbiste I am taking this. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue Gentoo signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

On Sun, 03 Feb 2013 13:46:52 +0100 Pacho Ramos wrote: > dev-libs/boehm-gc Will take this one in a few days if no one else grabs it first. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

On 02/03/2013 01:18 PM, Matthew Thode wrote: > On 02/03/2013 12:46 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: >> Due matsuu lack of time the following packages are up for grabs: >> app-admin/augeas >> app-admin/puppet >> dev-ml/ocaml-augeas >> dev-python/python-augeas >> dev-ruby/facter >> dev-ruby/hiera >> > > taki

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

On 02/03/2013 12:46 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > Due matsuu lack of time the following packages are up for grabs: > app-admin/augeas > app-admin/puppet > dev-ml/ocaml-augeas > dev-python/python-augeas > dev-ruby/facter > dev-ruby/hiera > taking these :D -- -- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire) sign

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > Due matsuu lack of time the following packages are up for grabs: > app-backup/dar I'll take this one. Looks like most of the open bugs should be trivial to fix. Rich

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

On 13:11 Sat 02 Feb 2013, Pacho Ramos wrote: > app-emulation/vov > app-text/rtf2html > net-misc/directvnc Those will be maintained by Dennis (dlan) Lan and I will proxy. I updated metadata.xml. Cheers, Thomas -- Thomas Kahle http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/ signature.asc Description: Digital

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due caster lack of time

On 2013-02-02, at 7:20 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > After talking with him we agreed to have the following packages up for > grabs: > sci-geosciences/googleearth > media-gfx/picasa (will probably be treecleaned as upstream dropped linux > suppport time ago) > I just tried installing picasa two da

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due spock retirement

On 1/20/13 11:09 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > dev-python/pycuda Sci is taking this. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 12:57 AM, Panagiotis Christopoulos < pchr...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On 22:52 Thu 20 Dec , Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Due araujo no longer taking care of them: > > dev-lang/gnu-smalltalk > > ... > > I'm taking this one. > > -- > Panagiotis Christopoulos ( pchrist ) > ( Gent

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On 22:52 Thu 20 Dec , Pacho Ramos wrote: > Due araujo no longer taking care of them: > dev-lang/gnu-smalltalk > ... I'm taking this one. -- Panagiotis Christopoulos ( pchrist ) ( Gentoo Lisp Project ) pgpJt1_yi2GXq.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On 20 December 2012 16:52, Pacho Ramos wrote: > Due araujo no longer taking care of them: > dev-lang/pike I've got this one :)

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due nelchael retirement

2012/12/16 Pacho Ramos : > net-misc/openntpd I take this. -- Christoph Junghans http://dev.gentoo.org/~ottxor/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due nelchael retirement

On 2012-12-16 Sun 06:22, Pacho Ramos wrote: dev-libs/protobuf I'll take this since I already maintain protobuf-c. Tim pgpgjSAUrAAzt.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due nelchael retirement

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/16/2012 09:22 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > net-misc/openntpd This one's easy, I could proxy-maintain it. These two are also maintainer-needed: * app-doc/djbdns-man I'm maintaining djbdns, so I suppose I should have this one too. On the o

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due nelchael retirement

On 16 December 2012 14:22, Pacho Ramos wrote: > sys-power/hibernate-script I can take that, but if anyone else wants to help, feel free to do so -- Regards, Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due nelchael retirement

On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 15:22:25 +0100 Pacho Ramos wrote: > dev-python/python-gflags The Python team will take care of that one. But if someone's taking gflags itself, feel free to add yourself as well. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due beandog retirement

19.11.2012 02:33, Pacho Ramos wrote: > app-misc/dailystrips > app-misc/gramps > dev-php/PEAR-PEAR > dev-php/pear > games-misc/fortune-mod-mormon > games-misc/fortune-mod-scriptures > media-libs/libbluray > media-tv/ivtv-utils > media-tv/ivtv > media-video/mplayer-resume > sys-fs/mhddfs > x11-themes

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lavajoe retirement

Tomáš Chvátal schrieb: > Bundling few libs and bundling 40 of them is bit of difference, will YOU do > the audit? > Also other teams actively work on the unbundling, while there is track of no > will to actually make it buildable with system libs. > > Also the security is not the only problem he

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lavajoe retirement

On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 7:32 AM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > Bundling few libs and bundling 40 of them is bit of difference, will YOU do > the audit? We don't require security audits for packages to be in portage. Any package can have a security problem, whether it is in a bundled lib or otherwise. B

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lavajoe retirement

Dne So 1. prosince 2012 06:42:13, Rich Freeman napsal(a): > On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > > Dne Pá 30. listopadu 2012 20:37:22, Pacho Ramos napsal(a): > >> media-sound/logitechmediaserver-bin -> this package is "special", it's > >> maintained by a proxy maintainer but it

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lavajoe retirement

On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > Dne Pá 30. listopadu 2012 20:37:22, Pacho Ramos napsal(a): >> media-sound/logitechmediaserver-bin -> this package is "special", it's >> maintained by a proxy maintainer but it was reassigned to >> maintainer-needed instead of proxy-maint herd

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lavajoe retirement

Dne Pá 30. listopadu 2012 20:37:22, Pacho Ramos napsal(a): > media-sound/logitechmediaserver-bin -> this package is "special", it's > maintained by a proxy maintainer but it was reassigned to > maintainer-needed instead of proxy-maint herd. Was reviewing to reassign > it when I saw: > https://bugs.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due apache herd removal

On 11/28/12 15:25, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 11/27/2012 02:43 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: >> After discussing it at: >> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/262834 > >> ... > > > Apache itself is in need of some attention these days. The ChangeLog > shows only Patrick committing in th

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due apache herd removal

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/27/2012 02:43 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > After discussing it at: > http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/262834 > > ... > Apache itself is in need of some attention these days. The ChangeLog shows only Patrick committing in the last

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due apache herd removal

On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > www-apache/mod_fastcgi > www-apache/mod_fastcgi_handler app-admin/apachetop Took these 3. Cheers, -- Jesus Rivero (Neurogeek) Gentoo Developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due mobile herd removal

El lun, 19-11-2012 a las 19:13 -0500, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina escribió: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 11/18/2012 06:52 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Please be more careful declaring packages as "up for grabs". I am > personally maintainer of a number of these packages an

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due mobile herd removal

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/18/2012 06:52 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: Please be more careful declaring packages as "up for grabs". I am personally maintainer of a number of these packages and I will be extremely unhappy to be removed from such, even more unhappy with someone t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

El dom, 28-10-2012 a las 18:13 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: > After talking with cedk, he decided to leave the following package up > for grabs: > app-laptop/macbook-backlight > Could be treecleaned as talked with upstream (cedk): It's no longer developed and app-laptop/pommed is a good replaceme

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On 10/28/2012 10:08 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: As talked with Kumba, he will leave this packages up for grabs: dev-util/comparator net-mail/mhonarc Thanks for taking them I'll take dev-util/comparator since I've used it. -- Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] E-Mail: b

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due spatz retirement

07.10.2012 14:31, Pacho Ramos wrote: > app-text/lodgeit > media-plugins/gimp-resynthesizer > net-analyzer/namebench > x11-themes/pulse-glass > > Feel free to get them > > Thanks > > > netmon will take care of net-analyzer/namebench -- Best regards, Sergey Popov Gentoo Linux Developer Desktop-eff

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due wormo taking care of bug wrangling only

On 06/17/12 at 12:02AM +0200, Christian Ruppert wrote: > On 06/16/12 at 11:39AM +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > app-admin/ulogd > > app-arch/pdv > > > > > > > > Feel free to get them > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > I'll take app-admin/ulogd. > > -- > Regards, > Christian Ruppert > Role: Gent

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due wormo taking care of bug wrangling only

On 06/16/12 at 11:39AM +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote: > app-admin/ulogd > app-arch/pdv > > > > Feel free to get them > > Thanks > > > I'll take app-admin/ulogd. -- Regards, Christian Ruppert Role: Gentoo Linux developer, Bugzilla administrator and Infrastructure member Fingerprint: EEB1 C341 7

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due cla retirement

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/16/2012 10:13 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > net-misc/balance i'll take this one - -- - -- Gentoo Dev http://xmw.de/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.or

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due volkmar being unable to maintain them because of lack of time

On 16 June 2012 03:52, Pacho Ramos wrote: > The following packages are now orphan: > app-emulation/playonlinux > app-emulation/vboxgtk > dev-libs/xmlrpc-epi > dev-util/bam > media-libs/pnglite > media-video/miro > net-misc/plowshare > > Feel free to get them > > Thanks > > media-video/miro taken

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due dang concentrating in gnome work

On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 03:06:52PM +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote: > app-admin/logrotate > > Feel free to get them I'll take this one if nobody else wants to maintain it. Thanks. pgpvqZPluCrrO.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due gmsoft concentrating in hppa work

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 05/15/2012 12:33 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > [..] net-misc/dibbler I will take it - -- Regards, Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJPsp59AAoJE

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due gmsoft concentrating in hppa work

Excerpts from Pacho Ramos's message of 2012-05-15 13:33:04 +0200: > net-misc/aiccu I can take this one. -- Amadeusz Żołnowski signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due mrness retirement

On 04/06/2012 06:02 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > net-misc/openswan I'll take this; I use it to connect to a Microsoft L2TP server for work. If anyone wants to co-maintain you are welcome to do so. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 09:54:26PM +0100, Christoph Mende wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm currently lacking time for some packages, so I'm looking for >> someone to take over a few, most notably: >> >> - net-misc/curl >> - net-dns/c-ares (preferably both t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 11:44:16AM -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > On 03/24/2012 11:27 AM, Greg KH wrote: > >On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 09:54:26PM +0100, Christoph Mende wrote: > >>Hi, > >> > >>I'm currently lacking time for some packages, so I'm looking for > >>someone to take over a few, most nota

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On 03/24/2012 11:27 AM, Greg KH wrote: On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 09:54:26PM +0100, Christoph Mende wrote: Hi, I'm currently lacking time for some packages, so I'm looking for someone to take over a few, most notably: - net-misc/curl - net-dns/c-ares (preferably both together) I can take curl, b

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 09:54:26PM +0100, Christoph Mende wrote: > Hi, > > I'm currently lacking time for some packages, so I'm looking for > someone to take over a few, most notably: > > - net-misc/curl > - net-dns/c-ares (preferably both together) I can take curl, but I don't know what c-ares

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 03/23/2012 08:54 PM, Christoph Mende wrote: > Hi, > > - media-gfx/shotwell I will take this - -- Regards, Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgA

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On 03/23/2012 04:54 PM, Christoph Mende wrote: Hi, I'm currently lacking time for some packages, so I'm looking for someone to take over a few, most notably: - net-misc/curl - net-dns/c-ares (preferably both together) I'm at about my limit, but if no one else wants them, I'll take care of th

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due www-server herd removal

On 03/21/2012 07:26 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: www-servers/thttpd I can take care of this one -- Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 8040 5A4D 8709 21B1 1A88 33CE 979C AF40 D045 5535 GnuPG ID : D0455535

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due www-server herd removal

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:26:12PM +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote: > As discussed in "[gentoo-dev] www-servers herd is empty" thread, > we agreed with dropping this herd and let people get what they want > to maintain. This is the list of orphan packages: ... > www-servers/lighttpd This is not an orphan

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due www-server herd removal

On 03/21/12 19:26, Pacho Ramos wrote: > As discussed in "[gentoo-dev] www-servers herd is empty" thread, > we agreed with dropping this herd and let people get what they want > to maintain. This is the list of orphan packages: > www-servers/pound > www-servers/varnish I'm a gonna take those two

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due jokey retirement

El lun, 19-03-2012 a las 22:41 -0500, Paul Varner escribió: > On 3/19/12 2:26 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > El lun, 19-03-2012 a las 10:56 -0500, Paul Varner escribió: > >> On 03/18/12 13:50, Pacho Ramos wrote: > >>> Due his retirement the following packages need a new maintainer: > >>> > >>> app-port

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due jokey retirement

On 3/19/12 2:26 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: El lun, 19-03-2012 a las 10:56 -0500, Paul Varner escribió: On 03/18/12 13:50, Pacho Ramos wrote: Due his retirement the following packages need a new maintainer: app-portage/maintainer-helper Thanks for taking them I've added app-portage/maintainer-h

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due iluxa retirement

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: > On 03/19/2012 11:00 PM, David Leverton wrote: >> >> On 19 March 2012 06:05, Samuli Suominen  wrote: >>> >>> dev-cpp/cppserv would need working dev-cpp/sptk and we have none: >>> >>> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402149#c9 >>> >>> t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due iluxa retirement

On 03/19/2012 11:00 PM, David Leverton wrote: On 19 March 2012 06:05, Samuli Suominen wrote: dev-cpp/cppserv would need working dev-cpp/sptk and we have none: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402149#c9 the only working versions got marked as "obsolete" by upstream due to "undisclosed re

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >