Ühel kenal päeval, P, 19.04.2020 kell 20:20, kirjutas Mart Raudsepp:
> > Personally I would opt for global "appindicator" as it seems to be
> > more widely
> > used and I think it is a bit more self-explanatory :/
>
> So I assume we can
have*
> consensus here, so I'll start off with renaming it
Ühel kenal päeval, E, 06.04.2020 kell 15:23, kirjutas Pacho Ramos:
> El jue, 02-04-2020 a las 16:28 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I was reviewing about how to enable globally on my system the usage
> > of
> > libappindicator and I realized that we have multiple names for that
>
On 4/6/20 9:23 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El jue, 02-04-2020 a las 16:28 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I was reviewing about how to enable globally on my system the usage of
>> libappindicator and I realized that we have multiple names for that in the
>> tree.
>> "ayatana" is the only
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 9:23 AM Pacho Ramos wrote:
>
> El jue, 02-04-2020 a las 16:28 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I was reviewing about how to enable globally on my system the usage of
> > libappindicator and I realized that we have multiple names for that in the
> > tree.
> >
El jue, 02-04-2020 a las 16:28 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió:
> Hello,
>
> I was reviewing about how to enable globally on my system the usage of
> libappindicator and I realized that we have multiple names for that in the
> tree.
> "ayatana" is the only global one, while other packages are using
Hello,
I was reviewing about how to enable globally on my system the usage of
libappindicator and I realized that we have multiple names for that in the tree.
"ayatana" is the only global one, while other packages are using "indicator",
"libindicate", "appindicator"...
Personally I would merge
