On giovedì 22 aprile 2021 15:45:11 CEST Theo Anderson wrote:
> Hi Agostino,
>
> After some discussion in IRC we've agreed to have the maintainer of
> the respective packages be assigned to the bug with guru@g.o be CC'd.
> Where no maintainer exists for a package guru@g.o remains as the
>
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 01:45:11PM +, Theo Anderson wrote:
> After some discussion in IRC we've agreed to have the maintainer of
> the respective packages be assigned to the bug with guru@g.o be CC'd.
> Where no maintainer exists for a package guru@g.o remains as the
> assignee. If you could
> On 22 Apr 2021, at 14:31, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
>
> Thanks for all feedback.
>
> Please discuss all points internally (branch, email, trackers and so on) and
> send me an email with all changes you would like to have.
As an aside, I do appreciate the CI and it’s turned out to be pretty
On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:30:10 +0200
Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> On giovedì 22 aprile 2021 12:22:00 CEST Theo Anderson wrote:
> > On the subject of many bugs, there are now almost 150 open bugs
> > assigned to g...@gentoo.org. With this has come quite an email
> > avalanche for which I think people
Thanks for all feedback.
Please discuss all points internally (branch, email, trackers and so on) and
send me an email with all changes you would like to have.
Agostino
> On 22 Apr 2021, at 13:59, Ionen Wolkens wrote:
> [snip]
> And, even if you don't see it like that, someday someone may want
> to go on a fixing spree using those trackers (may it be for ::guru
> or ::gentoo) but will keep seeing them mixed up together.
Yes, this is particularly apt for me.
On giovedì 22 aprile 2021 14:59:00 CEST Ionen Wolkens wrote:
> And, even if you don't see it like that, someday someone may want
> to go on a fixing spree using those trackers (may it be for ::guru
> or ::gentoo) but will keep seeing them mixed up together.
You can do it as wel by doing a
On 22/04/2021 14:39, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
On giovedì 22 aprile 2021 12:02:20 CEST Michał Górny wrote:
Well, I suppose scanning the dev branch would be preferable over
the master branch. In reality, they are usually only a few hours apart
but it might be useful to know of new breakage in dev
On Thu, 2021-04-22 at 14:39 +0200, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> On giovedì 22 aprile 2021 12:02:20 CEST Michał Górny wrote:
> > Well, I suppose scanning the dev branch would be preferable over
> > the master branch. In reality, they are usually only a few hours apart
> > but it might be useful to
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 8:39 AM Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
>
> On giovedì 22 aprile 2021 12:02:20 CEST Michał Górny wrote:
> > Well, I suppose scanning the dev branch would be preferable over
> > the master branch. In reality, they are usually only a few hours apart
> > but it might be useful to
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 02:39:02PM +0200, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> On giovedì 22 aprile 2021 12:02:20 CEST Michał Górny wrote:
> > One more thing: might be a good idea to consider splitting some
> > of the 'big' trackers (like CFLAGS) between Gentoo and GURU. I think
> > solving these bugs in
On giovedì 22 aprile 2021 12:02:20 CEST Michał Górny wrote:
> Well, I suppose scanning the dev branch would be preferable over
> the master branch. In reality, they are usually only a few hours apart
> but it might be useful to know of new breakage in dev before it's merged
> to master.
>
> It
On giovedì 22 aprile 2021 12:22:00 CEST Theo Anderson wrote:
> On the subject of many bugs, there are now almost 150 open bugs
> assigned to g...@gentoo.org. With this has come quite an email avalanche
> for which I think people must have set up mail filters by now. I
> imagine this means that
On giovedì 22 aprile 2021 12:25:50 CEST Michał Górny wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-04-22 at 11:59 +0200, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I would like to let you know that the CI is now able to work with
> > overlays.
> >
> > Since Guru is pretty active I took advantage of this situation to
>
On Thu, 2021-04-22 at 11:59 +0200, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to let you know that the CI is now able to work with overlays.
>
> Since Guru is pretty active I took advantage of this situation to implement
> and test the CI
>
> Atm it has been configured to work with
On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 11:59:21 +0200
Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to let you know that the CI is now able to work with
> overlays.
>
> Since Guru is pretty active I took advantage of this situation to
> implement and test the CI
Thank you for implementing this, it certainly
On Thu, 2021-04-22 at 11:59 +0200, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to let you know that the CI is now able to work with overlays.
>
> Since Guru is pretty active I took advantage of this situation to implement
> and test the CI
>
> Atm it has been configured to work with
Hello,
I would like to let you know that the CI is now able to work with overlays.
Since Guru is pretty active I took advantage of this situation to implement
and test the CI
Atm it has been configured to work with master branch.
I don't know how much is useful scan the dev branch since a
18 matches
Mail list logo
