> On Wed, 16 May 2007, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> You end up with this:
> /usr/portage/packages/All/emacs-21.4-r12
> /usr/portage/packages/All/emacs-21
> When you go to merge your virtual, it will always merge the package,
> even if you're *trying* to merge an emacs alternative.
This is no l
On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 19:52 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 May 2007, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
>
> >> virtual/emacs
>
> > You made a new-style virtual with the same name as a package? This
> > can cause problems with binary package usage, as you will now end up
> > with two package
> On Wed, 16 May 2007, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
>> virtual/emacs
> You made a new-style virtual with the same name as a package? This
> can cause problems with binary package usage, as you will now end up
> with two packages with the same "name" but different versions.
There are several other
On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 15:25 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 May 2007, Jakub Moc wrote:
>
> >> virtual/emacs
> >> virtual/flim
>
> > Oh, and naming the new-style virtuals the same as the real thing
> > kills binpkgs. :/
>
> Sorry, I don't get your point here.
>
> The "real thing"
On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 12:44 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> The Emacs team has converted the following virtual packages:
>
>virtual/emacs
You made a new-style virtual with the same name as a package? This can
cause problems with binary package usage, as you will now end up with
two packages w
> On Tue, 15 May 2007, Jakub Moc wrote:
>> virtual/emacs
>> virtual/flim
> Oh, and naming the new-style virtuals the same as the real thing
> kills binpkgs. :/
Sorry, I don't get your point here.
The "real thing" is, e.g., emacs-21.4-r12 and the virtual is emacs-21.
How is this not sufficie
Ulrich Mueller napsal(a):
> The Emacs team has converted the following virtual packages:
>
>virtual/emacs
>virtual/flim
>
> to new-style (aka GLEP 37) virtuals.
Oh, and naming the new-style virtuals the same as the real thing kills
binpkgs. :/
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMA
> On Tue, 15 May 2007, Jakub Moc wrote:
> Leaving the old-style virtuals in place leaves the new style ones
> non-fuctional, so you'd better remove them right now. ;)
> On Tue, 15 May 2007, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Wait. Are you saying that currently you have identically named new and
>
> On Tue, 15 May 2007, Petteri Räty wrote:
>> I could not find any official guidelines for keywording of virtual
>> packages.
> They are keyworded as any other packages. You can't make them stable
> if they have ~arch only dependencies. When one provider is stable,
> they are fine to go stabl
On Tue, 15 May 2007 12:44:56 +0200
Ulrich Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Emacs team has converted the following virtual packages:
>
>virtual/emacs
>virtual/flim
>
> to new-style (aka GLEP 37) virtuals. If there are no objections,
> I will remove the old virtuals from the profile
Ulrich Mueller napsal(a):
> The Emacs team has converted the following virtual packages:
>
>virtual/emacs
>virtual/flim
>
> to new-style (aka GLEP 37) virtuals. If there are no objections,
> I will remove the old virtuals from the profiles one week from now
> (22 May 2007).
Leaving the o
The Emacs team has converted the following virtual packages:
virtual/emacs
virtual/flim
to new-style (aka GLEP 37) virtuals. If there are no objections,
I will remove the old virtuals from the profiles one week from now
(22 May 2007). Affected are:
profiles/base
profiles/embedded
12 matches
Mail list logo
