On Thursday 15 June 2006 20:17, Marcus D. Hanwell wrote:
>
> I have to agree that I have never understood the need for the distinction
> between herd and team. It does not seem to add anything, I guess some
> people do not like being referred to as a herd may be? It really doesn't
> bother me. I th
On Thursday 15 June 2006 12:34, Jakub Moc wrote:
> Marcus D. Hanwell wrote:
> > I don't know if this is a really unpopular viewpoint, but for a lot of
> > stuff I maintain I put myself as maintainer and the herd I am acting as
> > part of in herd. My intention there is to say primarily I am taking
On Thursday 15 June 2006 08:59, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 15 June 2006 02:33, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> > We could require that a herd mail alias be maintained for every herd,
> > with the same name as the herd, such that the herd alias lists the
> > maintainers of all packages in the herd.
On Sat, 2006-06-17 at 14:00 +, Ferris McCormick wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sat, 17 Jun 2006, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
>
> > On Saturday 17 June 2006 04:51, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
> >> How exactly does one go about maintaining our developers? ;)
> >
> > It
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 17 Jun 2006, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
On Saturday 17 June 2006 04:51, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
How exactly does one go about maintaining our developers? ;)
It's devrel's cursed job. Ask them. :)
Carsten
Um, whips and chains. But we'r
On Saturday 17 June 2006 04:51, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
> How exactly does one go about maintaining our developers? ;)
It's devrel's cursed job. Ask them. :)
Carsten
pgpDHDEmEDUMI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, 2006-06-17 at 12:55 +0200, Jan Kundrát wrote:
> Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 00:26 -0500, Lance Albertson wrote:
> >> Alec Warner wrote:
> >>> So apparently they suck, anyone have a new shiny idea on how to group
> >>> packages and maintaining developers?
> >
> > Ho
Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 00:26 -0500, Lance Albertson wrote:
>> Alec Warner wrote:
>>> So apparently they suck, anyone have a new shiny idea on how to group
>>> packages and maintaining developers?
>
> How exactly does one go about maintaining our developers? ;)
"develop
Alec Warner wrote:
So apparently they suck, anyone have a new shiny idea on how to group
packages and maintaining developers?
Sure -- take the current herds implementation, and rename it to 'gaggle'! Then
we can call things the base-system gaggle, the toolchain gaggle, etc...
Even metadata.
On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 00:26 -0500, Lance Albertson wrote:
> Alec Warner wrote:
> > So apparently they suck, anyone have a new shiny idea on how to group
> > packages and maintaining developers?
How exactly does one go about maintaining our developers? ;)
> I suggest we create a murder of develope
On Thursday 15 June 2006 14:17, Marcus D. Hanwell wrote:
>
> I don't see why it matters so much...
agreed
-mike
pgpEISahsw3VX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 22:01 +0200, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 15:22:31 -0400
> Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I would much
> > rather see something like sunrise (but not necessarily sunrise
> > itself) used to put packages which are no longer maintained, but wer
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 15:22:31 -0400
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would much
> rather see something like sunrise (but not necessarily sunrise
> itself) used to put packages which are no longer maintained, but were
> once in the tree.
sunset.overlays.g.o :)
--
Kevin F. Quinn
s
On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 20:43 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
> And again, what's this distinction good for? Well, it's useless unless
> you are trying to enforce something like what you've suggested here
> before, i.e.
>
>
> I see nothing wrong with listing perl as the herd, *only* if
> they have themselv
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 17:43 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
>>> Say it with me.
>>>
>>> Herd == packages
>>> Team == people
>> There's no such thing like in metadata.xml, that's what we've
>> been talking about for ~1 day now.
>
> Maybe it's what you erroneously have been trying
On Thursday 15 June 2006 14:56, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 00:31:41 -0400 Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> | So apparently they suck, anyone have a new shiny idea on how to group
> | packages and maintaining developers?
>
> Herds the way they operate in practice are fi
> On Thursday 15 June 2006 00:31, Alec Warner wrote:
> So apparently they suck, anyone have a new shiny idea on how to group
> packages and maintaining developers?
As Mike says:
> they work just fine for me
--
Sandro (sanchan)
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 15 June 2006 09:04, George Prowse wrote:
>> On 15/06/06, Kevin F. Quinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 00:31:41 -0400 Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So apparently they suck, anyone have a new shiny idea on how to group
packag
On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 17:43 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
> > Say it with me.
> >
> > Herd == packages
> > Team == people
>
> There's no such thing like in metadata.xml, that's what we've
> been talking about for ~1 day now.
Maybe it's what you erroneously have been trying to say that I've been
sayin
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
>
> *sigh*
Indeed...
> No. You've gone and changed the practices we have in place now to make
> it more complicated.
No, I didn't. If games herd wants any game dumped onto games herd, then
do it. Most other people probably don't want unknown stuff dumped on them.
> Say
On Thursday 15 June 2006 09:04, George Prowse wrote:
> On 15/06/06, Kevin F. Quinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 00:31:41 -0400 Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > So apparently they suck, anyone have a new shiny idea on how to group
> > > packages and maintaining deve
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 00:31:41 -0400 Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| So apparently they suck, anyone have a new shiny idea on how to group
| packages and maintaining developers?
Herds the way they operate in practice are fine. The issue is the old
metastructure definition, which a) encourag
On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 12:34 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
> Marcus D. Hanwell wrote:
> > I don't know if this is a really unpopular viewpoint, but for a lot of
> > stuff I
> > maintain I put myself as maintainer and the herd I am acting as part of in
> > herd. My intention there is to say primarily I
On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 02:59 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 15 June 2006 02:33, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> > We could require that a herd mail alias be maintained for every herd,
> > with the same name as the herd, such that the herd alias lists the
> > maintainers of all packages in the he
On 15/06/06, Kevin F. Quinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 00:31:41 -0400Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> So apparently they suck, anyone have a new shiny idea on how to group> packages and maintaining developers?
We could be boring and change "herd" to "packagegroup".--Kevin
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 12:34:42PM +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
> :=) If a general consent is (games left apart ;) that is a backup
> for cases when maintainer is unavailable/goes MIA, and a primary
> maintainer if there's no tag in metadata.xml, let's just
> leave it at that, be done with it and save
On 6/15/06, Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So apparently they suck, anyone have a new shiny idea on how to group
packages and maintaining developers?
Herds are fine ... just seems to be some differing ideas about how
they are managed. That's inevitable, given our collective reluctance
Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
>>
>> - same name as herd requirement doesn't work for stuff like
>> cron/mysql/postgresql/apache... i.e., system accounts.
>
> Herd aliases could be named "herd-", perhaps.
Current practice for these aliases is -bugs in most of the cases.
Examples - apache-bugs, php-bugs, c
Marcus D. Hanwell wrote:
> I don't know if this is a really unpopular viewpoint, but for a lot of stuff
> I
> maintain I put myself as maintainer and the herd I am acting as part of in
> herd. My intention there is to say primarily I am taking care of this and
> have taken responsibility but if
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 11:57:21 +0200
Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Thursday 15 June 2006 02:33, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> >> We could require that a herd mail alias be maintained for every
> >> herd, with the same name as the herd, such that the herd alias
> >> li
On Thursday 15 June 2006 10:57, Jakub Moc wrote:
> > On Thursday 15 June 2006 02:33, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> >> We could require that a herd mail alias be maintained for every herd,
> >> with the same name as the herd, such that the herd alias lists the
> >> maintainers of all packages in the herd.
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 15 June 2006 02:33, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
>> We could require that a herd mail alias be maintained for every herd,
>> with the same name as the herd, such that the herd alias lists the
>> maintainers of all packages in the herd.
>
> this would be useful regardle
On Thursday 15 June 2006 02:33, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> We could require that a herd mail alias be maintained for every herd,
> with the same name as the herd, such that the herd alias lists the
> maintainers of all packages in the herd.
this would be useful regardless
-mike
pgpNaJsppizDH.pgp
De
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 00:31:41 -0400
Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So apparently they suck, anyone have a new shiny idea on how to group
> packages and maintaining developers?
We could be boring and change "herd" to "packagegroup".
We could require that a herd mail alias be maintained f
On Thursday 15 June 2006 00:31, Alec Warner wrote:
> So apparently they suck, anyone have a new shiny idea on how to group
> packages and maintaining developers?
they work just fine for me
-mike
pgpyOk8hXaUzk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Alec Warner wrote:
> So apparently they suck, anyone have a new shiny idea on how to group
> packages and maintaining developers?
I suggest we create a murder of developers! Then we can be cool and not
suck! :-)
/me goes back into lurking mode
--
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Infra
So apparently they suck, anyone have a new shiny idea on how to group
packages and maintaining developers?
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
37 matches
Mail list logo
