Re: [gentoo-dev] New category for (libre)office extensions: office-ext?
On Sun, 6 May 2012 18:06:35 +0200 Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote: I've collected information and the extensions (should) work with any office variant, openoffice and libreoffice. To be more precise, they should work with anything that uses the so-called uno bridge. uno-plugins/* jer
Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] New category for (libre)office extensions: office-ext?
On Sun, 6 May 2012, Andreas K Huettel wrote: I've collected information and the extensions (should) work with any office variant, openoffice and libreoffice. To be more precise, they should work with anything that uses the so-called uno bridge. This is why I like the new category office-plugins best... and would like to implement that one. Is there any chance that there will be more than one or two office-* categories in future? If not, I think that we shouldn't introduce a new category prefix for this. The category should be named app-* instead. How about app-ooo, following the naming of the virtual? Ulrich Well... we're already breaking that rule by having lxde-base, perl-core, sec- policy... and kde-*, rox-*, xfce-* exist only twice. So I would not handle this requirement too strongly. (I could e.g. imagine categories office-templates, office-filters, but that's right now pure speculation.) app-ooo kind of minimizes the ah yes I know what goes there effect. -- Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer kde, sci, arm, tex, printing signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-dev] New category for (libre)office extensions: office-ext?
Am Samstag, 5. Mai 2012, 23:15:46 schrieb Markos Chandras:
On 05/05/2012 08:04 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Sat, 5 May 2012 20:40:47 +0200 Andreas K. Huettel
dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
there's a growing culture of libreoffice extensions, and (with
the help of an eclass prepared by scarabeus) it would be nice to
get some of them into the portage tree. Now we have to decide
where to put them.
Suggestion: new category office-ext
What do you think?
office-plugins, to follow suit.
This may be confusing as people would expect these plugins to work
with both {open,libre}office packages. If these plugins are just for
libreoffice then I would prefer app-libreoffice like other people have
already suggested
I've collected information and the extensions (should) work with any office
variant, openoffice and libreoffice. To be more precise, they should work with
anything that uses the so-called uno bridge.
This is why I like the new category office-plugins best... and would like to
implement that one.
Any additional objections?
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer
kde (team lead), sci, tex, arm, printing
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-dev] New category for (libre)office extensions: office-ext?
On Sun, 6 May 2012, Andreas K Huettel wrote: I've collected information and the extensions (should) work with any office variant, openoffice and libreoffice. To be more precise, they should work with anything that uses the so-called uno bridge. This is why I like the new category office-plugins best... and would like to implement that one. Is there any chance that there will be more than one or two office-* categories in future? If not, I think that we shouldn't introduce a new category prefix for this. The category should be named app-* instead. How about app-ooo, following the naming of the virtual? Ulrich
Re: [gentoo-dev] New category for (libre)office extensions: office-ext?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/05/12 09:06, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
Am Samstag, 5. Mai 2012, 23:15:46 schrieb Markos Chandras:
On 05/05/2012 08:04 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Sat, 5 May 2012 20:40:47 +0200 Andreas K. Huettel
dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
there's a growing culture of libreoffice extensions, and (with
the help of an eclass prepared by scarabeus) it would be nice to
get some of them into the portage tree. Now we have to decide
where to put them.
Suggestion: new category office-ext
What do you think?
office-plugins, to follow suit.
This may be confusing as people would expect these plugins to work
with both {open,libre}office packages. If these plugins are just for
libreoffice then I would prefer app-libreoffice like other people have
already suggested
I've collected information and the extensions (should) work with any office
variant, openoffice and libreoffice. To be more precise, they should work
with
anything that uses the so-called uno bridge.
This is why I like the new category office-plugins best... and would like
to
implement that one.
Any additional objections?
I prefer app-plugins even if it is broader.
lu
- --
Luca Barbato
Gentoo/linux
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk+myw0ACgkQ6Ex4woTpDjTVJwCfZjNrwt9WXj6JlELPLwF60kj2
wl4An3EM5GaEvUTsVRbTlVIP+puoQz35
=nn8m
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
[gentoo-dev] New category for (libre)office extensions: office-ext ?
Hiya, there's a growing culture of libreoffice extensions, and (with the help of an eclass prepared by scarabeus) it would be nice to get some of them into the portage tree. Now we have to decide where to put them. Suggestion: new category office-ext What do you think? Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer kde (team lead), sci, tex, arm, printing dilfri...@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-dev] New category for (libre)office extensions: office-ext ?
On 05/05/12 14:40, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: Hiya, there's a growing culture of libreoffice extensions, and (with the help of an eclass prepared by scarabeus) it would be nice to get some of them into the portage tree. Now we have to decide where to put them. Suggestion: new category office-ext What do you think? No preference myself, but we already have e.g. app-emacs and www-apache which (I guess?) reflect the fact that emacs lies under app-foo and apache under www-bar. That would suggest app-libreoffice?
Re: [gentoo-dev] New category for (libre)office extensions: office-ext ?
On Sat, 5 May 2012 20:40:47 +0200 Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote: there's a growing culture of libreoffice extensions, and (with the help of an eclass prepared by scarabeus) it would be nice to get some of them into the portage tree. Now we have to decide where to put them. Suggestion: new category office-ext What do you think? office-plugins, to follow suit. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] New category for (libre)office extensions: office-ext ?
On 05/05/12 21:01, Michael Orlitzky wrote: On 05/05/12 14:40, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: Hiya, there's a growing culture of libreoffice extensions, and (with the help of an eclass prepared by scarabeus) it would be nice to get some of them into the portage tree. Now we have to decide where to put them. Suggestion: new category office-ext What do you think? No preference myself, but we already have e.g. app-emacs and www-apache which (I guess?) reflect the fact that emacs lies under app-foo and apache under www-bar. That would suggest app-libreoffice? +1 on app-libreoffice if they are only for LibreOffice. Can those extensions work with app-office/openoffice-bin? -- Krzysztof Pawlik nelchael at gentoo.org key id: 0xF6A80E46 desktop-misc, java, vim, kernel, python, apache... signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] New category for (libre)office extensions: office-ext ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 05/05/2012 08:04 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Sat, 5 May 2012 20:40:47 +0200 Andreas K. Huettel
dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
there's a growing culture of libreoffice extensions, and (with
the help of an eclass prepared by scarabeus) it would be nice to
get some of them into the portage tree. Now we have to decide
where to put them.
Suggestion: new category office-ext
What do you think?
office-plugins, to follow suit.
This may be confusing as people would expect these plugins to work
with both {open,libre}office packages. If these plugins are just for
libreoffice then I would prefer app-libreoffice like other people have
already suggested
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)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=6GG+
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
