Re: [gentoo-dev] New category for (libre)office extensions: office-ext?

2012-05-08 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Sun, 6 May 2012 18:06:35 +0200 Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote: I've collected information and the extensions (should) work with any office variant, openoffice and libreoffice. To be more precise, they should work with anything that uses the so-called uno bridge.

Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] New category for (libre)office extensions: office-ext?

2012-05-07 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
On Sun, 6 May 2012, Andreas K Huettel wrote: I've collected information and the extensions (should) work with any office variant, openoffice and libreoffice. To be more precise, they should work with anything that uses the so-called uno bridge. This is why I like the new category

Re: [gentoo-dev] New category for (libre)office extensions: office-ext?

2012-05-06 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
Am Samstag, 5. Mai 2012, 23:15:46 schrieb Markos Chandras: On 05/05/2012 08:04 PM, Michał Górny wrote: On Sat, 5 May 2012 20:40:47 +0200 Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote: there's a growing culture of libreoffice extensions, and (with the help of an eclass prepared by

Re: [gentoo-dev] New category for (libre)office extensions: office-ext?

2012-05-06 Thread Ulrich Mueller
On Sun, 6 May 2012, Andreas K Huettel wrote: I've collected information and the extensions (should) work with any office variant, openoffice and libreoffice. To be more precise, they should work with anything that uses the so-called uno bridge. This is why I like the new category

Re: [gentoo-dev] New category for (libre)office extensions: office-ext?

2012-05-06 Thread Luca Barbato
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/05/12 09:06, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: Am Samstag, 5. Mai 2012, 23:15:46 schrieb Markos Chandras: On 05/05/2012 08:04 PM, Michał Górny wrote: On Sat, 5 May 2012 20:40:47 +0200 Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote: there's a

[gentoo-dev] New category for (libre)office extensions: office-ext ?

2012-05-05 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
Hiya, there's a growing culture of libreoffice extensions, and (with the help of an eclass prepared by scarabeus) it would be nice to get some of them into the portage tree. Now we have to decide where to put them. Suggestion: new category office-ext What do you think? Cheers, Andreas --

Re: [gentoo-dev] New category for (libre)office extensions: office-ext ?

2012-05-05 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 05/05/12 14:40, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: Hiya, there's a growing culture of libreoffice extensions, and (with the help of an eclass prepared by scarabeus) it would be nice to get some of them into the portage tree. Now we have to decide where to put them. Suggestion: new category

Re: [gentoo-dev] New category for (libre)office extensions: office-ext ?

2012-05-05 Thread Michał Górny
On Sat, 5 May 2012 20:40:47 +0200 Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote: there's a growing culture of libreoffice extensions, and (with the help of an eclass prepared by scarabeus) it would be nice to get some of them into the portage tree. Now we have to decide where to put them.

Re: [gentoo-dev] New category for (libre)office extensions: office-ext ?

2012-05-05 Thread Krzysztof Pawlik
On 05/05/12 21:01, Michael Orlitzky wrote: On 05/05/12 14:40, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: Hiya, there's a growing culture of libreoffice extensions, and (with the help of an eclass prepared by scarabeus) it would be nice to get some of them into the portage tree. Now we have to decide

Re: [gentoo-dev] New category for (libre)office extensions: office-ext ?

2012-05-05 Thread Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 05/05/2012 08:04 PM, Michał Górny wrote: On Sat, 5 May 2012 20:40:47 +0200 Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote: there's a growing culture of libreoffice extensions, and (with the help of an eclass prepared by scarabeus) it would