On 22.8.2021 23.14, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Yes! It is time to finally deprecate eudev! sys-fs/udev now builds
> under musl! My original purpose for maintaining eudev was because
> systemd + musl did not play well together when udev was absorbed into
> the sytemd repo. Now
> On 24 Aug 2021, at 11:24, Jaco Kroon wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> We run glibc based systems. No musl. But we don't use systemd.
>
> As little as a year back we still ran into issues with systemd-udev
> variant breaking systems, the fix of course was to nuke it and install
> eudev. Are we cert
On 8/24/21 6:24 AM, Jaco Kroon wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We run glibc based systems. No musl. But we don't use systemd.
>
> As little as a year back we still ran into issues with systemd-udev
> variant breaking systems, the fix of course was to nuke it and install
> eudev. Are we certain there is n
Hi All,
We run glibc based systems. No musl. But we don't use systemd.
As little as a year back we still ran into issues with systemd-udev
variant breaking systems, the fix of course was to nuke it and install
eudev. Are we certain there is nothing (eg, LVM integration was our
biggest problem
On 8/23/2021 12:24, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-08-23 at 16:36 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>> On Mon, 23 Aug 2021, Anthony G Basile wrote:
>>
> **WARNING**
>
> If you happen to have an INSTALL_MASK with a blanket "*systemd*"
> glob, you will inevitably break your system
> On 22 Aug 2021, at 21:14, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>
> Title: eudev retirement on 2022-01-01
> Author: Anthony G. Basile
> Posted: 2021-08-xx
> Revision: 1
> News-Item-Format: 2.0
> Display-If-Installed: sys-fs/eudev
>
Let's mention that people should double check if they're
On Mon, 23 Aug 2021 at 18:24, Michał Górny wrote:
> I'm pretty sure we've never officially advised anyone to remove
> important directories via INSTALL_MASK. INSTALL_MASK on unit
> directories will not affect udev users. On the other hand, if someone
> was overzealous and stripped whole /lib/sys
On Mon, 2021-08-23 at 16:36 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > > > > > On Mon, 23 Aug 2021, Anthony G Basile wrote:
>
> > > > **WARNING**
> > > >
> > > > If you happen to have an INSTALL_MASK with a blanket "*systemd*"
> > > > glob, you will inevitably break your system. sys-fs/udev
> > > > contain
On 8/23/21 11:05 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 10:36 AM Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 23 Aug 2021, Anthony G Basile wrote:
>>
> **WARNING**
>
> If you happen to have an INSTALL_MASK with a blanket "*systemd*"
> glob, you will inevitably break your sys
On Mon, 2021-08-23 at 11:16 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 10:46 AM David Seifert wrote:
> >
> > Let assume the counterfactual for a moment here: We retained the
> > USE=systemd flag for all unit files and what not, so people can
> > cleanse
> > themselves of the systemd uni
On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 10:46 AM David Seifert wrote:
>
> Let assume the counterfactual for a moment here: We retained the
> USE=systemd flag for all unit files and what not, so people can cleanse
> themselves of the systemd units etc. without resorting to INSTALL_MASK.
>
> How would USE=-systemd
On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 10:36 AM Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 23 Aug 2021, Anthony G Basile wrote:
>
> >>> **WARNING**
> >>>
> >>> If you happen to have an INSTALL_MASK with a blanket "*systemd*"
> >>> glob, you will inevitably break your system. sys-fs/udev contains
> >>> "systemd" in
On Mon, 2021-08-23 at 16:36 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > > > > > On Mon, 23 Aug 2021, Anthony G Basile wrote:
>
> > > > **WARNING**
> > > >
> > > > If you happen to have an INSTALL_MASK with a blanket "*systemd*"
> > > > glob, you will inevitably break your system. sys-fs/udev
> > > > contain
> On Mon, 23 Aug 2021, Anthony G Basile wrote:
>>> **WARNING**
>>>
>>> If you happen to have an INSTALL_MASK with a blanket "*systemd*"
>>> glob, you will inevitably break your system. sys-fs/udev contains
>>> "systemd" in some of its filenames, hence a blanket filter rule will
>>> likely lea
On 8/22/21 5:00 PM, Joshua Kinard wrote:
> On 8/22/2021 16:14, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> Yes! It is time to finally deprecate eudev! sys-fs/udev now builds
>> under musl! My original purpose for maintaining eudev was because
>> systemd + musl did not play well together when
On 22/08/21 22:14, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Yes! It is time to finally deprecate eudev! sys-fs/udev now builds
> under musl! My original purpose for maintaining eudev was because
> systemd + musl did not play well together when udev was absorbed into
> the sytemd repo. Now t
On 8/22/2021 16:14, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Yes! It is time to finally deprecate eudev! sys-fs/udev now builds
> under musl! My original purpose for maintaining eudev was because
> systemd + musl did not play well together when udev was absorbed into
> the sytemd repo. Now
Hi everyone,
Yes! It is time to finally deprecate eudev! sys-fs/udev now builds
under musl! My original purpose for maintaining eudev was because
systemd + musl did not play well together when udev was absorbed into
the sytemd repo. Now thanks to patches from openembedded, they do, and
my orig
18 matches
Mail list logo
