Re: [gentoo-dev] Please help us decide naming scheme for cmake use calls
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 02:56:23PM +0200, Piotr Jaroszy??ski wrote: > Apparently I don't even have a dev forum account set up If anyone wants their developer status on the forums who doesn't have it then send us an e-mail to forum-m...@gentoo.org or pop into #gentoo-forums and we'll sort it out for you. Cheers, tomk pgp2bspNZmf5y.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Please help us decide naming scheme for cmake use calls
> as we discussed on scons.eclass thread at -dev ml we should have some > nice naming scheme for use_xxx calls with cmake and scons. And it should > be done in same fashion. for both So please head up to the formus poll > [1] and vote for your favorite. Apparently I don't even have a dev forum account set up (and I don't care), but count my vote as "who cares" if there's such an option. -- Best Regards Piotr Jaroszyński
Re: [gentoo-dev] Please help us decide naming scheme for cmake use calls
2010/8/23 Tomáš Chvátal : > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > as we discussed on scons.eclass thread at -dev ml we should have some > nice naming scheme for use_xxx calls with cmake and scons. And it should > be done in same fashion. for both So please head up to the formus poll > [1] and vote for your favorite. just pick one. I'm sure Mike would be happy if you followed the 'standard' but I doubt he would be heartbroken if you went the other way. I don't really see the point of voting on which color we should paint the bikeshed[1]. (for those who live under a rock and have never built a bikeshed) [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parkinson's_Law_of_Triviality > > The vote is open for 30 days starting 23. 8. 2010. > > This call is for developers/ht/at only. Users can't vote on this one. > > Cheers > > [1] http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-841360.html > > - > Tomáš Chvátal > Gentoo Linux Developer [Cluster/Council/KDE/QA/Sci/X11] > E-Mail : scarab...@gentoo.org > GnuPG FP : 94A4 5CCD 85D3 DE24 FE99 F924 1C1E 9CDE 0341 4587 > GnuPG ID : 03414587 > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAkxyKo8ACgkQHB6c3gNBRYcxwwCeLafmCrz+ZfxkfRcGJX0Fb41v > FsoAn2jdpxjRpOv5QwlqNrFBz4u8HqKj > =q0uR > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > >
[gentoo-dev] Please help us decide naming scheme for cmake use calls
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, as we discussed on scons.eclass thread at -dev ml we should have some nice naming scheme for use_xxx calls with cmake and scons. And it should be done in same fashion. for both So please head up to the formus poll [1] and vote for your favorite. The vote is open for 30 days starting 23. 8. 2010. This call is for developers/ht/at only. Users can't vote on this one. Cheers [1] http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-841360.html - Tomáš Chvátal Gentoo Linux Developer [Cluster/Council/KDE/QA/Sci/X11] E-Mail : scarab...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP: 94A4 5CCD 85D3 DE24 FE99 F924 1C1E 9CDE 0341 4587 GnuPG ID: 03414587 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkxyKo8ACgkQHB6c3gNBRYcxwwCeLafmCrz+ZfxkfRcGJX0Fb41v FsoAn2jdpxjRpOv5QwlqNrFBz4u8HqKj =q0uR -END PGP SIGNATURE-
