On Thursday 26 October 2006 00:57, Alec Warner wrote:
Caleb Cushing wrote:
reporting additions of new programs aren't feasible? or are you
referring to version updates and package bumps and such
Reporting removals will be done by treecleaners once I have it implemented.
Reporting
On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 20:42:14 +0200 Paul de Vrieze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Someone needs to implement the foo; however.
|
| (Not on cvs, but on a normal tree, but maybe works on cvs. There is a
| sanity check by checking that a dir contains at least 1 ebuild)
If the foo were that simple,
Paul de Vrieze wrote:
On Thursday 26 October 2006 00:57, Alec Warner wrote:
Caleb Cushing wrote:
reporting additions of new programs aren't feasible? or are you
referring to version updates and package bumps and such
Reporting removals will be done by treecleaners once I have it
Hi,
On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 19:58:09 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 20:42:14 +0200 Paul de Vrieze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Someone needs to implement the foo; however.
|
| (Not on cvs, but on a normal tree, but maybe works on cvs. There is
a | sanity
Yuri Vasilevski wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 19:58:09 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 20:42:14 +0200 Paul de Vrieze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Someone needs to implement the foo; however.
|
| (Not on cvs, but on a normal tree, but maybe works on cvs.
On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 17:09:10 -0400
Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It doesn't cover updates/. I don't think that corner case is easily
covered.
Ehm, if you have a list of CP entries that were added/removed and
access to the update files it shouldn't be all that complicated.
Just made
On Wednesday 25 October 2006 21:56, Yuri Vasilevski wrote:
After seeing Upcoming package removals, for couple of weeks now, in
GWN I'm beginning to think that I would like to see also a list of new
packages added to portage next to the list of packages to be removed.
http://packages.gentoo.org/
On Wed, 2006-10-25 at 14:56 -0500, Yuri Vasilevski wrote:
If you think this is a good idea, I'd be glad to write some scripts for
this.
If you write all the code, I'll run it, but I'm not taking my time to
track down all of the additions. The current removals is done by hand
by some volunteers
reporting additions of new programs aren't feasible? or are you
referring to version updates and package bumps and such
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Wed, 2006-10-25 at 16:25 -0400, Caleb Cushing wrote:
reporting additions of new programs aren't feasible? or are you
referring to version updates and package bumps and such
None of it is feasible if I'm left to do it by hand. I have much better
things to do (like actually add new
Caleb Cushing wrote:
reporting additions of new programs aren't feasible? or are you
referring to version updates and package bumps and such
Reporting removals will be done by treecleaners once I have it implemented.
Reporting additions may require some cvs foo on lark; such as new
11 matches
Mail list logo
