On Mon, 04 Mar 2013 20:28:58 +0200
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 03/03/13 19:24, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 15:42:56 +0100
> > hasufell wrote:
> >
> >> What do we have useflags for in gentoo?
> >
> > Not for conditional patching, that's for sure.
>
> Yet that is exactly what IUSE=va
On 03/03/13 19:24, Ryan Hill wrote:
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 15:42:56 +0100
hasufell wrote:
What do we have useflags for in gentoo?
Not for conditional patching, that's for sure.
Yet that is exactly what IUSE=vanilla is designed for... ;-)
On 03/03/13 16:42, hasufell wrote:
On 03/03/2013 08:11 AM, Alec Warner wrote:
There was a big ole' chat on #gentoo-dev regarding this. My
understanding of the summary is that the nvidia-driver Gentoo team
only supports kernels that nvidia themselves (upstream) support. The
Kernels > 3.4 are not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/03/2013 12:24 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 15:42:56 +0100 hasufell
> wrote:
>
>> What do we have useflags for in gentoo?
>
> Not for conditional patching, that's for sure.
>
>> add a "unsupported-kernels" useflag, mask it, add a
On 03/03/13 09:11, Alec Warner wrote:
[...] My understanding of the summary is that the nvidia-driver
Gentoo team only supports kernels that nvidia themselves (upstream)
support. The Kernels > 3.4 are not supported by upstream, so they
are also not supported in Gentoo. [...] There is a fear as we
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 23:05:28 +0100
hasufell wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 03/03/2013 06:24 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 15:42:56 +0100 hasufell
> > wrote:
> >
> >> What do we have useflags for in gentoo?
> >
> > Not for conditional patching, t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/03/2013 06:24 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 15:42:56 +0100 hasufell
> wrote:
>
>> What do we have useflags for in gentoo?
>
> Not for conditional patching, that's for sure.
>
That simply diverges from reality.
# qgrep epatch |
Ryan Hill schrieb:
> On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 15:42:56 +0100
> hasufell wrote:
>
>> What do we have useflags for in gentoo?
>
> Not for conditional patching, that's for sure.
USE="vanilla" already controls conditional patching for around two dozen
packages.
>> add a "unsupported-kernels" useflag, mas
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Mar 2013 23:11:44 -0800
> Alec Warner wrote:
>
> > I do not find their stance wholly unreasonable. They offered to point
> > users at an overlay, if someone was willing to maintain the patches
> > there (in lieu of user_patches.) The e
On Sat, 2 Mar 2013 23:11:44 -0800
Alec Warner wrote:
> I do not find their stance wholly unreasonable. They offered to point
> users at an overlay, if someone was willing to maintain the patches
> there (in lieu of user_patches.) The end result is that if users apply
> the patches, they will get
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 15:42:56 +0100
hasufell wrote:
> What do we have useflags for in gentoo?
Not for conditional patching, that's for sure.
> add a "unsupported-kernels" useflag, mask it, add a clear statement in
> the masking reason and be done
If the description of the flag you're adding cou
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Carlos Silva wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 1:42 PM, hasufell wrote:
>>
>> What do we have useflags for in gentoo?
>>
>> add a "unsupported-kernels" useflag, mask it, add a clear statement in
>> the masking reason and be done
>
>
> Not a bad solution, still, I, as
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 1:42 PM, hasufell wrote:
> What do we have useflags for in gentoo?
>
> add a "unsupported-kernels" useflag, mask it, add a clear statement in
> the masking reason and be done
>
Not a bad solution, still, I, as a user, don't think making the compilation
work with a specific
On 03/03/2013 08:11 AM, Alec Warner wrote:
>
> There was a big ole' chat on #gentoo-dev regarding this. My
> understanding of the summary is that the nvidia-driver Gentoo team
> only supports kernels that nvidia themselves (upstream) support. The
> Kernels > 3.4 are not supported by upstream, so t
On Sat, 2 Mar 2013 23:11:44 -0800
Alec Warner wrote:
> My understanding of the summary is that the nvidia-driver Gentoo team
> only supports kernels that nvidia themselves (upstream) support. The
> Kernels > 3.4 are not supported by upstream, so they are also not
> supported in Gentoo.
There is
On 03/03/13 09:11, Alec Warner wrote:
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 02/03/13 18:02, Doug Goldstein (cardoe) wrote:
cardoe 13/03/02 16:02:57
Modified: nvidia-drivers-313.18.ebuild ChangeLog
Log:
Revert non-maintainer changes per bug #4
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 02/03/13 18:02, Doug Goldstein (cardoe) wrote:
>>
>> cardoe 13/03/02 16:02:57
>>
>>Modified: nvidia-drivers-313.18.ebuild ChangeLog
>>Log:
>>Revert non-maintainer changes per bug #447566.
>>
>>(Portage ve
On 02/03/13 18:02, Doug Goldstein (cardoe) wrote:
cardoe 13/03/02 16:02:57
Modified: nvidia-drivers-313.18.ebuild ChangeLog
Log:
Revert non-maintainer changes per bug #447566.
(Portage version: 2.1.11.52/cvs/Linux x86_64, signed Manifest commit with
key D7DFA8D318F
18 matches
Mail list logo
