On 17-12-09 16:29:24, Daniel Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 09:22:32PM +0100, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, 7. Dezember 2017, 19:06:36 CET schrieb William L. Thomson
> > Jr.:
> > >
> > > The day everyone wanted has come, after this message. I will
> > > unsubscribe not t
On Fri, 08 Dec 2017 21:22:32 +0100 Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 7. Dezember 2017, 19:06:36 CET schrieb William L. Thomson Jr.:
> >
> > The day everyone wanted has come, after this message. I will
> > unsubscribe not to return. You all won in 2008, and again in 2017.
> > Though this t
On 12/10/2017 03:21 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Your attack on me is fully unfounded and completely inappropriate. FYI,
> just let me correct a few facts here:
--- pruned ---
> 3. The agenda item wasn't expressing 'feelings of one developer', as you
> know it. It was written by me because I found th
On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 11:31 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
>
> Well, let's consider the order of events here:
> ...
> This looks awfully clear to me.
>...
> I'm not focused on the ban, or whether it was deserved.
That's exactly what you've done here. You've connected a bunch of
dots that you can se
On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 2:21 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> W dniu sob, 09.12.2017 o godzinie 16∶29 -0800, użytkownik Daniel
> Campbell napisał:
>> On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 09:22:32PM +0100, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>> > Am Donnerstag, 7. Dezember 2017, 19:06:36 CET schrieb William L. Thomson
>> > Jr.
W dniu sob, 09.12.2017 o godzinie 16∶29 -0800, użytkownik Daniel
Campbell napisał:
> On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 09:22:32PM +0100, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, 7. Dezember 2017, 19:06:36 CET schrieb William L. Thomson
> > Jr.:
> > >
> > > The day everyone wanted has come, after this m
On Sat, Dec 09, 2017 at 08:13:18PM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 7:29 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
> >
> > Other developers are required to subscribe to -dev, and are
> > expected to follow it so they stay informed.
>
> Developers are not required to subscribe to -dev.
>
> >
On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 7:29 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
>
> Other developers are required to subscribe to -dev, and are
> expected to follow it so they stay informed.
Developers are not required to subscribe to -dev.
> If they missed something covered on the list, they are directed to the
> archi
On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 09:22:32PM +0100, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 7. Dezember 2017, 19:06:36 CET schrieb William L. Thomson Jr.:
> >
> > The day everyone wanted has come, after this message. I will
> > unsubscribe not to return. You all won in 2008, and again in 2017.
> > Though
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 7:57 PM, R0b0t1 wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 7:20 PM, Georg Rudoy <0xd34df...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2017-12-08 2:43 GMT-05:00 R0b0t1 :
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand
>>> wrote:
>>> > On 12/04/2017 10:36 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
>>>
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 7:20 PM, Georg Rudoy <0xd34df...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2017-12-08 2:43 GMT-05:00 R0b0t1 :
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand
>> wrote:
>> > On 12/04/2017 10:36 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
>> >> Sorry last one, directed to Alec, but all should re
2017-12-08 2:43 GMT-05:00 R0b0t1 :
>
> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> > On 12/04/2017 10:36 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> >> Sorry last one, directed to Alec, but all should read.
> >
> > I hope you really mean that, we've all heard you complaining about this
On 08/12/17 21:22, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>
> Independent of whether William now unsubscribed or not, he's now enjoying a
> lengthy (1 year until review) vacation from all Gentoo communication channels.
>
This seems like a meaningless thing to post at this point. And you might
want to conside
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>>
>> Independent of whether William now unsubscribed or not, he's now enjoying a
>> lengthy (1 year until review) vacation from all Gentoo communication
>> channels.
>>
>
> I don't understand two things about Gentoo
Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>
> Independent of whether William now unsubscribed or not, he's now enjoying a
> lengthy (1 year until review) vacation from all Gentoo communication channels.
>
I don't understand two things about Gentoo:
1. style: How can anyone consider "enjoying a vacation" to be
Am Donnerstag, 7. Dezember 2017, 19:06:36 CET schrieb William L. Thomson Jr.:
>
> The day everyone wanted has come, after this message. I will
> unsubscribe not to return. You all won in 2008, and again in 2017.
> Though this time I will not be back. I tried more than most anyone else
> would for
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 12/04/2017 10:36 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
>> Sorry last one, directed to Alec, but all should read.
>
> I hope you really mean that, we've all heard you complaining about this
> too many times already.
>
Inasmuch as a rand
On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 22:39:04 +0100
Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 12/04/2017 10:36 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> > Sorry last one, directed to Alec, but all should read.
>
> I hope you really mean that, we've all heard you complaining about
> this too many times already.
The day every
I apologize for replying to only this message, but #1 stood out and I
am still catching up.
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 12:57 PM, kuzetsa wrote:
> On 12/04/2017 01:51 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
>> On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 13:15:32 +
>> "M. J. Everitt" wrote:
>>
>>> On 04/12/17 00:37, Matt Turner
On 12/04/2017 10:36 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> Sorry last one, directed to Alec, but all should read.
I hope you really mean that, we've all heard you complaining about this
too many times already.
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:
Sorry last one, directed to Alec, but all should read.
On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 16:08:51 -0500
"William L. Thomson Jr." wrote:
>
> You could at least realize being here since 2008. If your not the one
> making it better. Maybe do not give others a hard time or creating
> more noise. I do not feel you a
On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 14:54:38 -0500
Alec Warner wrote:
>
> I think you make my point sir; not debase it. You did (and continue
> to do) many things, that are in fact
> valuable
What else may I have done since 08 had things been otherwise?
Gentoo's loss.
> However, you also contributed very negati
> On Mon, 4 Dec 2017, William L Thomson wrote:
[quote omitted]
Can you keep this out of gentoo-dev, please? You personal
reminiscences are very off-topic in this mailing list.
Ulrich
pgp9lk61Z9Iem.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 2:37 PM, William L. Thomson Jr.
wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 14:17:00 -0500
> Alec Warner wrote:
> >
> > Clearly if Gentoo could be successful if millions of people were
> > killed; we would not choose to kill millions of people.
> > Clearly if Gentoo could be successful if
On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 14:17:00 -0500
Alec Warner wrote:
>
> Clearly if Gentoo could be successful if millions of people were
> killed; we would not choose to kill millions of people.
> Clearly if Gentoo could be successful if dozens of people were
> harassed; we would not choose to harass dozens of
On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 13:57:16 -0500
kuzetsa wrote:
> On 12/04/2017 01:51 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> > On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 13:15:32 +
> > "M. J. Everitt" wrote:
> >
> >> On 04/12/17 00:37, Matt Turner wrote:
> >>> A user requested I forward this information to the mailing list:
> >>
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 1:51 PM, William L. Thomson Jr.
wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 13:15:32 +
> "M. J. Everitt" wrote:
>
> > On 04/12/17 00:37, Matt Turner wrote:
> > > A user requested I forward this information to the mailing list:
> > >
> > > http://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Publication%20Files
On 12/04/2017 01:51 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 13:15:32 +
> "M. J. Everitt" wrote:
>
>> On 04/12/17 00:37, Matt Turner wrote:
>>> A user requested I forward this information to the mailing list:
>>>
>>> http://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Publication%20Files/16-057_d45c0b4f-
On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 13:15:32 +
"M. J. Everitt" wrote:
> On 04/12/17 00:37, Matt Turner wrote:
> > A user requested I forward this information to the mailing list:
> >
> > http://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Publication%20Files/16-057_d45c0b4f-fa19-49de-8f1b-4b12fe054fea.pdf
> > https://goo.gl/42A8v7 (s
W dniu nie, 03.12.2017 o godzinie 14∶06 -0800, użytkownik Matt Turner
napisał:
> On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > The problems of more abusive behavior from some of the mailing list
> > members have been reported to ComRel numerous times. After the failure
> > of initial enf
On 04/12/17 00:37, Matt Turner wrote:
> A user requested I forward this information to the mailing list:
>
> There's been research, on this, and the study by harvard business
> school was summarized and discussed by NPR in 2015:
>
> [ Turns out toxic coworkers are more
> than just an annoyance. A n
On 12/03/2017 07:51 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 7:37 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
>> With gentoo being a non-profit organization, an alternative way to
>> view it could be the trade-off of seeing developers / maintainers /
>> staff leave
> It isn't just the risk of leaving, but the
On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 7:37 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
>
> With gentoo being a non-profit organization, an alternative way to
> view it could be the trade-off of seeing developers / maintainers /
> staff leave
It isn't just the risk of leaving, but the risk of them never joining
in the first place.
A user requested I forward this information to the mailing list:
There's been research, on this, and the study by harvard business
school was summarized and discussed by NPR in 2015:
[ Turns out toxic coworkers are more
than just an annoyance. A new study
out of the Harvard Business School
warns
On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> The problems of more abusive behavior from some of the mailing list
> members have been reported to ComRel numerous times. After the failure
> of initial enforcement, I'm not aware of ComRel doing anything to solve
> the problem. The main argum
35 matches
Mail list logo
