Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: www-client/chromium gtk3 support

2015-09-23 Thread Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov
В письме от Чт, 10 сентября 2015 17:43:30 пользователь Duncan написал: > So I've learned (the hard way) to use *stars* or _underlines_ (or for > lower levels, /italics/) for emphasis, and only use ALL CAPS when I > really do intend to SHOUT, which isn't often. Ok. Thank you for netiquette remind

[gentoo-dev] Re: www-client/chromium gtk3 support

2015-09-12 Thread Duncan
Rich Freeman posted on Sat, 12 Sep 2015 06:48:13 -0400 as excerpted: > On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 6:00 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: >> >> Just bite the bullet and create entire USE flag families such that an >> ebuild can choose the flag appropriate to how it actually uses it. >> AFAIK t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: www-client/chromium gtk3 support

2015-09-12 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 6:00 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > > Just bite the bullet and create entire USE flag families such that an > ebuild can choose the flag appropriate to how it actually uses it. AFAIK > this would need EAPI help, for reasons given below, but it should be > doable

[gentoo-dev] Re: www-client/chromium gtk3 support

2015-09-12 Thread Duncan
Raymond Jennings posted on Fri, 11 Sep 2015 21:55:46 -0700 as excerpted: > On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 5:13 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: > >> USE=gui or something like that if the main effect is to have a gui or >> not. That is the sort of thing that SHOULD go in make.conf or in a >> profile. If disabl

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: www-client/chromium gtk3 support

2015-09-11 Thread Rich Freeman
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > Rich Freeman posted on Fri, 11 Sep 2015 08:13:48 -0400 as excerpted: > >> USE=gui or something like that if the main effect is to have a gui or >> not. >> That is the sort of thing that SHOULD go in make.conf or in a profile.

[gentoo-dev] Re: www-client/chromium gtk3 support

2015-09-11 Thread Duncan
Rich Freeman posted on Fri, 11 Sep 2015 08:13:48 -0400 as excerpted: > USE=gui or something like that if the main effect is to have a gui or > not. > That is the sort of thing that SHOULD go in make.conf or in a profile. > If disabling gtk makes it a console-only application then use the gui > fl

[gentoo-dev] Re: www-client/chromium gtk3 support

2015-09-10 Thread Duncan
hasufell posted on Thu, 10 Sep 2015 18:57:43 +0200 as excerpted: > On 09/10/2015 04:31 PM, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote: >> WE HAVE NO RIGHT TO DICTATE users what they should use and what they >> should not. @ Vadim in particular: FWIW, some people are much more sensitive to short runs of ALL

[gentoo-dev] Re: www-client/chromium gtk3 support

2015-09-10 Thread Duncan
hasufell posted on Thu, 10 Sep 2015 17:35:53 +0200 as excerpted: >> Again, I'm saying that maintainers should be free to support multiple >> versions if they wish to do so. They should not be required to do so. >> And yes, I do realize that this limits options for users, but they're >> welcome to

[gentoo-dev] Re: www-client/chromium gtk3 support

2015-09-10 Thread Duncan
hasufell posted on Thu, 10 Sep 2015 10:47:26 +0200 as excerpted: > On 09/10/2015 08:21 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote: >> >> For me to not support gtk2 in the spacefm ebuild would be providing a >> package inferior to upstream. > > That sounds like spacefm with gtk3 is lacking anything. It is not. >