On 04/09/2014 10:54, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 11:03 PM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
> wrote:
>> Gentoo typically tries to keep patching to a minimum in general. To be
>> enabling something like this by default seems bad, the fact that it is
>> openssh compounds that. +1 for remo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 04/09/2014 05:03 AM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote:
> On 04/08/2014 02:40 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>
> Gentoo typically tries to keep patching to a minimum in general.
> To be enabling something like this by default seems bad, the fact
> that it
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 11:03 PM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
wrote:
> Gentoo typically tries to keep patching to a minimum in general. To be
> enabling something like this by default seems bad, the fact that it is
> openssh compounds that. +1 for removing the + and leaving this optional
> (default
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/08/2014 02:40 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
Gentoo typically tries to keep patching to a minimum in general. To be
enabling something like this by default seems bad, the fact that it is
openssh compounds that. +1 for removing the + and leaving this
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 8:40 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> A bug in an upstream-supported feature is quite different from a
> patched-in feature that upstream doesn't support.
Since no maintainer has spoken up here, I filed a bug:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=507210
I filed a similar bug
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Marcin Mirosław wrote:
> According to last problem with openssl and +tls-heartbeat I'd like to
> see less features enabled by default. USE="-*" isn't the best solution;)
>
A bug in an upstream-supported feature is quite different from a
patched-in feature that upst
W dniu 2014-03-31 19:35, Toralf Förster pisze:
> On 03/31/2014 01:15 PM, Alex Xu wrote:
>> On 31/03/14 03:36 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
>>> So, I'm interested... How widely used is the HPN patch set? Are there
>>> any good indications that it doesn't negatively impact security?
>
>> https://bugs.d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/31/2014 01:15 PM, Alex Xu wrote:
> On 31/03/14 03:36 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
>> So, I'm interested... How widely used is the HPN patch set? Are there
>> any good indications that it doesn't negatively impact security?
>
> https://bugs.debia
On 31/03/14 03:36 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> So, I'm interested... How widely used is the HPN patch set? Are there
> any good indications that it doesn't negatively impact security?
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=292932
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=693424
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 11:31 PM, hasufell wrote:
> We have had those debates whether the "+" should follow upstream
> decisions and such. Short answer: the maintainer decides. There is no
> consistency for this and there will never be.
That may be true, I still think it behooves us to be particu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Toralf Förster:
> On 03/29/2014 08:12 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
>> On Sat, 29 Mar 2014 07:15:14 -0400 Alex Xu
>> wrote:
>
>>> On 29/03/14 06:07 AM, Toralf Förster wrote:
WRT to but 504616 I'd like to address my questions made in
https://bu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/29/2014 08:12 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Mar 2014 07:15:14 -0400 Alex Xu
> wrote:
>
>> On 29/03/14 06:07 AM, Toralf Förster wrote:
>>> WRT to but 504616 I'd like to address my questions made in
>>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.c
On Sat, 29 Mar 2014 07:15:14 -0400
Alex Xu wrote:
> On 29/03/14 06:07 AM, Toralf Förster wrote:
> > WRT to but 504616 I'd like to address my questions made in
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=504616#c6 to this list
> > again :
> >
> > "Since the Debian debakel with "fixing" an uni
On 29/03/14 06:07 AM, Toralf Förster wrote:
> WRT to but 504616 I'd like to address my questions made in
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=504616#c6 to this list again :
>
> "Since the Debian debakel with "fixing" an uninitialized memeory I'm
> very skeptical to distribution specif
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
WRT to but 504616 I'd like to address my questions made in
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=504616#c6 to this list again :
"Since the Debian debakel with "fixing" an uninitialized memeory I'm
very skeptical to distribution specific
15 matches
Mail list logo
