Here's what we have:
app-office/qhacc/qhacc-3.4.ebuild: [ -n ${PF} ] rm -rf
/usr/share/doc/${PF}
net-fs/samba/samba-3.0.14a-r2.ebuild: rm -rf
${ROOT}/usr/share/doc/${PF}
net-fs/samba/samba-3.0.14a-r3.ebuild: rm -rf
${ROOT}/usr/share/doc/${PF}
Stuart Herbert wrote:
I can see where you're coming from, but I'm not sure it's worth the
potential disruption that this will cause our users.
Unless I'm missing something, won't every user who has any form of
USE=xml, USE=-xml, USE=xml2, or USE=-xml2 in make.conf and packages.use
get a
http://dev.gentoo.org/~betelgeuse/scripts/checkdeps.rb
Some people will probably find this useful. Basically it does ldd on all
the elf files in a package and then checks to which packages those
libraries belong. I think portage people are working on integrating
something like this to portage in
Well, you should know that those are because of portage bugs or some
portage peculiarity, read the corresponding bugs for example for cups
to find out more.
Regards,
Stefan
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Friday 23 December 2005 20:19, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
Well, you should know that those are because of portage bugs or some
portage peculiarity, read the corresponding bugs for example for cups
to find out more.
Can you point me to a bug? There's no mention in the ChangeLog that I can see
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 08:31:06PM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Friday 23 December 2005 20:19, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
Well, you should know that those are because of portage bugs or some
portage peculiarity, read the corresponding bugs for example for cups
to find out more.
Can you
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 13:09:08 +0200
Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Basically it does ldd on all the elf files in a package and then
checks to which packages those libraries belong.
I don't think ldd alone is the way to go, because it doesn't make
distinction beetween direct and indirect
On Friday 23 December 2005 21:39, Harald van Dijk wrote:
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 08:31:06PM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Friday 23 December 2005 20:19, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
Well, you should know that those are because of portage bugs or some
portage peculiarity, read the corresponding
On Friday 23 December 2005 21:39, Harald van Dijk wrote:
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 08:31:06PM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Friday 23 December 2005 20:19, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
Well, you should know that those are because of portage bugs or some
portage peculiarity, read the corresponding
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 10:00:20PM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Friday 23 December 2005 21:39, Harald van Dijk wrote:
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 08:31:06PM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Friday 23 December 2005 20:19, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
Well, you should know that those are because of
On Thursday 22 December 2005 21:52, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
On Thursday 22 December 2005 20:14, Drake Wyrm wrote:
Query: Which would be more appropriate in this case? jasper for the
library it pulls in as a depend, or jpeg2k for the functionality that
library provides? There's nothing else in
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 02:03:39PM +, Marcus D. Hanwell wrote:
That is why I don't quite understand why Mozilla based browsers use the
mozsvg
use flag when there is already a global svg use flag available and if you
enable svg you can pretty much guarantee you will want it in mozilla
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 10:58:03PM +, Stuart Herbert wrote:
On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 23:48 +0200, Petteri R??ty wrote:
/usr/portage/profiles/use.desc:xml - Check/Support flag for XML library
(version 1)
I think the xml use flag should be more generic. There are after all
other
Hello,
We recently switched development platform from RedHat/Fedora to Gentoo.
Great you'd say. However, now our users (most notably on Solaris) complain
that our small utility's ./configure bails out with the dreadful message:
*** [Gentoo] sanity check failed! ***
***
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 01:09:08PM +0200, Petteri R??ty wrote:
Basically it does ldd on all
the elf files in a package and then checks to which packages those
libraries belong.
ldd is garbage for this purpose
use `readelf -d ELF | grep NEEDED` or just `scanelf -n ELF`
-mike
--
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 03:52:37PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In other words, it breaks portability. And let this be the one thing people
expect from using GNU's ubiquitous autotools. Our comments follow:
this has been fixed already, you should update to libtool-1.5.20-r1
c) follow
On Friday 23 December 2005 22:13, Harald van Dijk wrote:
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 10:00:20PM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Friday 23 December 2005 21:39, Harald van Dijk wrote:
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 08:31:06PM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Friday 23 December 2005 20:19, Stefan Schweizer
On Thursday 15 December 2005 16:50, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Patrick Lauer wrote:
| On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 07:43 -0700, Duncan wrote:
|This really belongs on user, or perhaps on the appropriate purposed list,
|desktop or hardened or whatever, not on devel. That said, some
|comments... (I can't
On Thursday 15 December 2005 19:38, John Myers wrote:
On Thursday 15 December 2005 04:48, Patrick Lauer wrote:
Hi all,
I was wondering if there are any sane ways to optimize the performance
of a Gentoo system.
Overoptimization (the well known -O9 -fomgomg CFLAGS etc.) tends to
make
To Gentoo nVidia users:
We are in the process of developing and testing
a unified nVidia driver ebuild. When implemented,
it will replace the nvidia-kernel, nvidia-glx, and
nvidia-settings ebuilds. It will also add the utility
nvidia-xconfig.
We would like your help in evaluating, testing, and
On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 02:22:06AM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
Symlinks are handled within portage differently to regular files. Regular
files get an mtime check and are removed if it matches. Symlinks don't get an
mtime check (even thought the mtime is stored) and are only removed if the
On Friday 16 December 2005 18:54, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 10:00:02 +0100 Danny van Dyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Just one remark: What about making the syntax a bit more familiar to
| C++ users:
|
| ~ DEPENDS=gentoo-foo::foo-bar/baz-2.1
That was my original thought
On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 09:36 -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul de Vrieze wrote:
| On Thursday 15 December 2005 16:50, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
|gentoo-performance Discussions about improving the performance of
Gentoo
|
|Although it
I'm not at all pleased with the current state of the ebooks. I guess
I missed the discussion about it on this list before. I looked at the
archives and I didn't see any response to vapier's question about *why*
ebookmerge was happening.
I don't want to be forced to use the ebookmerge script.
On Saturday 24 December 2005 02:52, Harald van Dijk wrote:
On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 02:22:06AM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
Symlinks are handled within portage differently to regular files. Regular
files get an mtime check and are removed if it matches. Symlinks don't
get an mtime check (even
On Saturday 24 December 2005 02:57, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
On Friday 16 December 2005 18:54, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 10:00:02 +0100 Danny van Dyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Just one remark: What about making the syntax a bit more familiar to
| C++ users:
|
| ~
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 18:57:44 +0100 Paul de Vrieze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| That was my original thought when I started playing with it. I
| switched to postfix to make it more consistent with the way :slot
| and [use] restrictions work. *shrug* I guess it's down to whether
| you consider a
|
On Friday 23 December 2005 19:12, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 18:57:44 +0100 Paul de Vrieze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| That was my original thought when I started playing with it. I
| switched to postfix to make it more consistent with the way :slot
| and [use] restrictions
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 02:22:06 +0900
Jason Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PackageA is installed, PackageB is installed, PackageB is
uninstalled - PackageA is broken. Does this case exist?
Found two on my system:
* /usr/lib/X11/app-defaults - /etc/X11/app-defaults is
installed by several X11
On Sunday 18 December 2005 05:15, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
You are encouraged to reply to this thread saying I agree with ciaranm
that repository IDs should not be allowed to contain spaces.
I agree with ciaranm that repository IDs should not be allowed to contain
spaces.
Paul
ps. Thanks for
Jason Stubbs posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Sat, 24 Dec 2005 02:22:06 +0900:
A quick patch makes symlinks handled similarly to regular files and
solves the issue. I'll put it into testing unless anybody can come up
with a reason not to. The case that will be broken by the patch
On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 03:09:47AM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Saturday 24 December 2005 02:52, Harald van Dijk wrote:
On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 02:22:06AM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
Symlinks are handled within portage differently to regular files. Regular
files get an mtime check and are
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 12:41:45PM -0500, Peter wrote:
We are in the process of developing and testing
a unified nVidia driver ebuild. When implemented,
it will replace the nvidia-kernel, nvidia-glx, and
nvidia-settings ebuilds. It will also add the utility
nvidia-xconfig.
issues:
- people
Duncan wrote:
It just sounds like it /could/ be dangerous to me. For some reason, I
don't like the idea of something that could hose a system that badly! =8^\
It won't hose your system badly, since you've got /usr/lib64 listed in
/etc/ld.so.conf. I agree it wouldn't be very nice though.
On Saturday 24 December 2005 03:43, Duncan wrote:
Jason Stubbs posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Sat, 24 Dec 2005 02:22:06 +0900:
A quick patch makes symlinks handled similarly to regular files and
solves the issue. I'll put it into testing unless anybody can come up
with a
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 18:47:40 +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 12:41:45PM -0500, Peter wrote:
We are in the process of developing and testing
a unified nVidia driver ebuild. When implemented,
it will replace the nvidia-kernel, nvidia-glx, and
nvidia-settings ebuilds. It
On Saturday 24 December 2005 03:42, Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote:
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 02:22:06 +0900
Jason Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PackageA is installed, PackageB is installed, PackageB is
uninstalled - PackageA is broken. Does this case exist?
Found two on my system:
*
On Thursday 22 December 2005 08:13, Bret Towe wrote:
On 12/21/05, Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
I know some of you have done research on how gentoo-x86 converts over
to other systems besides CVS such as SVN, arch, etc. But I can't find
the info
Since nobody else has asked, I will. What is the point? What problem
are you trying to solve with this ebuild? As far as I can tell, there
is no point, other than trying to sound like you are doing something
important.
I can tell you that I would be disappointed if this replaces the
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 14:43:59 -0500, Stephen P. Becker wrote:
Since nobody else has asked, I will. What is the point? What problem
are you trying to solve with this ebuild? As far as I can tell, there
is no point, other than trying to sound like you are doing something
important.
Hi Peter,
On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 14:05 -0500, Peter wrote:
in any case. By unifying the ebuilds, we are merely duplicating what
nvidia provides in its install packages. We're not doing anything they
aren't.
Who is we please? As you're a non-dev, it would be polite to
introduce yourself at the
Sigh...The point was to take 3, potentially 4, ebuilds and make 1.
Well, nvidia-xconfig should probably be part of hte nvidia-settings
ebuild, but I really don't think the drivers and kernel module should be
included. Why not create a meta-ebuild which pulls all of these ebuilds
in, so that
On Friday 23 December 2005 16:44, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
It is with deep regret that I want to inform you about my decision to step
down from the position of Gentoo Documentation lead.
May I with this email thank you for the marvelous job you inspired the docs
team to during your leadership.
On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 20:34 +0100, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
On Thursday 22 December 2005 08:13, Bret Towe wrote:
On 12/21/05, Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
I know some of you have done research on how gentoo-x86 converts over
to other systems besides
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 20:13:45 +, Stuart Herbert wrote:
Hi Peter,
On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 14:05 -0500, Peter wrote:
in any case. By unifying the ebuilds, we are merely duplicating what
nvidia provides in its install packages. We're not doing anything they
aren't.
Who is we please?
On Sat, 2005-12-24 at 03:37 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Saturday 24 December 2005 03:23, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
On Friday 23 December 2005 19:12, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 18:57:44 +0100 Paul de Vrieze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Do those already work then? I'd like to be able
On Friday 23 December 2005 18:41, Peter wrote:
We would like your help in evaluating, testing, and
commenting on this approach. Please locate the latest
nvidia ebuild at:
I thought that we (gentoo devs) were trying to split the modules from ebuilds,
so that people don't need to waste time with
On Friday 23 December 2005 20:17, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
On Friday 23 December 2005 16:44, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
It is with deep regret that I want to inform you about my decision to
step down from the position of Gentoo Documentation lead.
May I with this email thank you for the marvelous
Mike Doty wrote:
Please take a moment to welcome our newest developer, pva. Peter is
joining to help out with netmon.
Welcome Peter!
--
Sandro (Sanchan) - Gentoo Developer
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Jason Stubbs posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Sat, 24 Dec 2005 04:06:05 +0900:
You are /sure/ the new code won't screw anything of that sort up, right?
Maybe that's the reason nobody seems to have been around to know about.
It just sounds like it /could/ be dangerous to me. For
On Friday 23 December 2005 21:45, Spider (DmD Lj) wrote:
Erm.. No, I don't think he is. We've been asking / waiting for the
[use] syntax to appear since before you joined the project. It's been on
the list for so long that many of us have given up... ; )
He - and I thought I just missed the
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 20:33:13 +0100 Paul de Vrieze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| - Checkout time of a full new tree (no load, and with load)
Do we really care about this? SVN will do really really badly here, but
does it matter?
| - Concurrency performance (how do multiple simultaneous commits and
|
As many of you no doubt have noticed, spyderous and I finished bumping
the modular packages to the newly released 7.0, which includes many
changes and bug fixes since 6.8.2. Over the next few weeks we'll be
finalizing licenses and other necessities. To whoever has been using
modular for
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 03:40:57PM -0700, Joshua Baergen wrote:
As many of you no doubt have noticed, spyderous and I finished bumping
the modular packages to the newly released 7.0, which includes many
changes and bug fixes since 6.8.2. Over the next few weeks we'll be
finalizing licenses
On Friday 23 December 2005 16:44, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
Hi all
It is with deep regret that I want to inform you about my decision to step
down from the position of Gentoo Documentation lead.
I just want to say thank you very much for the outstanding work you (and the
rest of the GDP-team)
http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/xorg-x11/migrating_to_modular_x_howto.txt
followed it this morning :)
On 12/23/05, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 03:40:57PM -0700, Joshua Baergen wrote:
As many of you no doubt have noticed, spyderous and I finished bumping
the
On Friday 23 December 2005 23:50, Greg KH wrote:
For those of us who want to try modular now, where's the pointer to how
to do this (I can't seem to find it in the archives, sorry...)
google for spyderous migrating guide site:dev.gentoo.org :)
--
Diego Flameeyes Pettenò -
On Friday 23 December 2005 18:35, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
Just to add. This is not so much related to debugging information in the
library files (what gdb can use). That information never makes it from disk
so is not that much of a speed issue (esp. if it is split out).
Actually, if the binaries
Roy Marples wrote:
On Friday 23 December 2005 20:17, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
On Friday 23 December 2005 16:44, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
It is with deep regret that I want to inform you about my decision to
step down from the position of Gentoo Documentation lead.
May I with this
Greg KH wrote:
For those of us who want to try modular now, where's the pointer to how
to do this (I can't seem to find it in the archives, sorry...)
I've been meaning to get it into guidexml and make it a real project doc
for a while now (and the accompanying porting guide), but haven't had
Joshua Baergen wrote:
As many of you no doubt have noticed, spyderous and I finished bumping
the modular packages to the newly released 7.0, which includes many
changes and bug fixes since 6.8.2. Over the next few weeks we'll be
finalizing licenses and other necessities. To whoever has been
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 10:30:09PM +0100, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
On Friday 23 December 2005 21:45, Spider (DmD Lj) wrote:
Erm.. No, I don't think he is. We've been asking / waiting for the
[use] syntax to appear since before you joined the project. It's been on
the list for so long that
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 17:04:32 -0800 Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| kde-libs/kde:3
| ^^^ need any kde, with slotting enabled.
|
| kde-libs/kde:3,4
| ^^^ need any kde, slotting 3 or 4.
Will foo-bar/baz:3* or foo-bar/baz:3.* work?
--
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill you
On Sunday 11 December 2005 18:02, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
Okay now that virtual/x11 introduced the new generation's virtuals, the
decision of waiting to have virtuals for iconv and libintl can be
considered concluded, and we might start adding them, right? :D
I'm still waiting for
On Friday 23 December 2005 15:52, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
On Friday 23 December 2005 18:35, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
Just to add. This is not so much related to debugging information in the
library files (what gdb can use). That information never makes it from
disk so is not that much
On Saturday 24 December 2005 05:45, Spider (DmD Lj) wrote:
On Sat, 2005-12-24 at 03:37 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Saturday 24 December 2005 03:23, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
On Friday 23 December 2005 19:12, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 18:57:44 +0100 Paul de Vrieze [EMAIL
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 12:50:33 +0900 Jason Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| SLOT is currently an arbitrary string (without spaces) so general
| matching of * might be useful. Of course, there's no restriction of
| not using * in SLOTs at the moment either...
*shrug* SLOT will have to be tightened
Sven Vermeulen wrote:
Hi all
It is with deep regret that I want to inform you about my decision to step
down from the position of Gentoo Documentation lead.
I can't believe this. I am very sad. Swift is my mentor and one of a few
people whos work inspired me to donate my time to Gentoo to
On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 12:40:35PM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Saturday 24 December 2005 05:45, Spider (DmD Lj) wrote:
On Sat, 2005-12-24 at 03:37 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Saturday 24 December 2005 03:23, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
On Friday 23 December 2005 19:12, Ciaran McCreesh
69 matches
Mail list logo
