EAPI inside ebuild is the best solution. If we really have to put it
inside filename, keep it out of extension, like 2) b) suggests.
--
Peter.
* Torsten Veller :
> Please review the attached perl-module.eclass.
> Patch linked below.
Thanks Bo Ørsted Andresen for feedback
> Changes
> ~~~
- use emake
- more quoting
- call perlinfo only once
As I've not seen any ebuild doing the replacement in line 156,
I've added a temporary ew
> 2) EAPI in file extension
> - Allows changing global scope and the internal format of the ebuild
> a) .ebuild-
> - ignored by current Portage
This is the solution that solves most problems. Going with something
else is just a way of doing it wrong for the sake of it.
- ferdy
pgpfhEMR
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:40:26 +0100
Luca Barbato wrote:
Be specific. Explain how this works when, say, 0.34.4 is current,
you have a 0.34.5_live and 0.34.5 comes out.
being live working as substitute for 0.34.5_preN (_live) component
the appearance of 0.34.5 will be highe
В Втр, 24/02/2009 в 16:14 +0200, Serkan Kaba пишет:
> lucene-contrib eclass in java-experimental [1] sets EAPI to 1 to use
> slot deps. And I think that's a valid usage.
>
> 1:
> http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/java/browser/java-experimental/eclass/lucene-contrib.eclass
It's better (the only way.
On Samstag, 28. Februar 2009, Peter Volkov wrote:
> В Втр, 24/02/2009 в 16:14 +0200, Serkan Kaba пишет:
> > lucene-contrib eclass in java-experimental [1] sets EAPI to 1 to use
> > slot deps. And I think that's a valid usage.
> >
> > 1:
> > http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/java/browser/java-experime
Petteri Räty wrote:
> 2) EAPI in file extension
> - Allows changing global scope and the internal format of the ebuild
> a) .ebuild-
> - ignored by current Portage
> b) ..ebuild
> - current Portage does not work with this
> c) ..
> - ignored by current Portage
I have been think
On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 19:39:36 +
Robert Bridge wrote:
> I have been thinking about this specific option. I will admit I don't
> know if this has already been noted, but would this create the
> possibility of multiple ebuilds with the same $C/$P-$PV?
GLEP 55 forbids it.
Note that it's already p
Kumba wrote:
I was talking to Alec last night in -dev (yes, I'm still alive), and I
tossed out the idea of using metadata.xml instead of mangling the ebuild
filename or even sticking it as the first line in the ebuild (as a
hashbang or something gentoo-specific, for example).
Fleshing out m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello guys,
~ As some of you may know, Python-2.6 was launched on Oct 1st, 2008
and have been sitting in the tree since Oct 5th. That is the official
production version of the Python programming language. That means,
python-2.5 is, according
10 matches
Mail list logo
