On K, 2009-06-03 at 02:13 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
USE network is used by 9 ebuilds, and one is using USE networking which
can be converted, that'd be 10.
USE 3dnowext is basic optimization, 3 ebuilds, but it should be with mmx
and others.
USE static-libs to enable or disable
On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 15:56 +0200, Patrick Lauer wrote:
Thank you for collecting this up!
parsers: The current practise of putting the eapi definition near the top of
the ebuild, combined with the need to state it for all non-EAPI0 ebuilds,
suggests that it can be parsed without having to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Richard Freeman wrote:
Steven J Long wrote:
Getting into a nonsensical debate about PN being metadata seems to be
the level of the argument, so forgive me for not being very impressed.
(It's externally derived and in fact the whole point of the
Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
I would like to kick-start the nominations by nominating Mart Raudsepp
(leio), Petteri Räty (betelgeuse), and Luca Barbato (lu_zero) [all of
them are CCed]
Patrick Lauer wrote:
* lu_zero, because he's done a good job and brings in his own ideas
without going religious
I had an idea for some new fields to go in metadata.xml. Not sure if we
would need a GLEP for this or not? Anyway, what do you guys think:
Two things I can think of adding that would be useful:
- ChangeLog URL
- Bug Tracker
I know I hate hunting down the two of them, and both of them could
2009/6/1 Dawid Węgliński c...@gentoo.org:
On Monday 01 of June 2009 06:25:06 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
Hello fellow developers and users.
I nominate:
peper
Thank you, I accept.
--
Best Regards,
Piotr Jaroszyński
On Wednesday 22 of April 2009 15:35:37 Petteri Räty wrote:
Here's an eclass proposal to wrap EXPORT_FUNCTIONS with auto detection
of functions. This way all eclasses don't have to duplicate the EAPI
detection code. If people find this useful, I will document it properly
with eclass-manpages
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:22 AM, Mounir Lamouri volk...@gentoo.org wrote:
Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
Most licenses aren't for usage, but for distribution -- surely you mean
EULAs?
License and EULA is the same for most users and it's exactly the same
for ebuilds/portage.
EULA is an End-User
The equery 'meta' module in gentoolkit-0.3.0* can show all the
upstream fields, though not many packages currently make use of it.
Oh yeah, and there's a traceback in the upstream code that's been
fixed but won't be in the tree until rc7, so you may want to wait to
check it out.
$ equery m
2009/6/1 Dawid Węgliński c...@gentoo.org:
I nominate:
[...]
Calchan
Thanks Dawid, and also Ferris. I accept. You can find my manifesto at
http://dev.gentoo.org/~calchan/manifesto09/manifesto.html
Denis.
Mart Raudsepp wrote:
On K, 2009-06-03 at 02:13 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
USE network is used by 9 ebuilds, and one is using USE networking which
can be converted, that'd be 10.
USE network Enable networking support
USE 3dnowext is basic optimization, 3 ebuilds, but it should be with
Jeremy Olexa wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Steve Dibb bean...@gentoo.org wrote:
I had an idea for some new fields to go in metadata.xml. Not sure if we
would need a GLEP for this or not? Anyway, what do you guys think:
Two things I can think of adding that would be useful:
-
Samuli Suominen wrote:
Mart Raudsepp wrote:
On K, 2009-06-03 at 02:13 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
USE network is used by 9 ebuilds, and one is using USE networking which
can be converted, that'd be 10.
USE network Enable networking support
Maybe network and net could be
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
Richard Freeman wrote:
Without actually intending to open a new debate on that issue cringes,
I'm actually a fan of NOT obtaining PN and PV from the filename. I've
seen an approach like this used in various systems and I happen to like it:
In which systems did
Mounir Lamouri wrote:
Samuli Suominen wrote:
Mart Raudsepp wrote:
On K, 2009-06-03 at 02:13 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
USE network is used by 9 ebuilds, and one is using USE networking which
can be converted, that'd be 10.
USE network Enable networking support
Maybe
2009/6/2 Doug Goldstein car...@gentoo.org:
All,
The current council meetings have gotten completely out of hand for
weeks meetings have become nothing more then a continuation of the
senseless bicker-fest that have become the e-mail threads on GLEP54,
GLEP55, and EAPI-3 without any real
Hi Doug,
I just got to this thread, so sorry for entering the debate a bit
late. I find your propositions very interesting. In my manifesto [1] I
have proposed something significantly different which simply consists
in spinning the long discussions off the council meetings using more
focused
Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:22 AM, Mounir Lamouri volk...@gentoo.org wrote:
Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
Most licenses aren't for usage, but for distribution -- surely you mean
EULAs?
License and EULA is the same for most users and it's exactly the same
Mike Frysinger wrote:
This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically
the 2nd Thursday at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel
(#gentoo-council @ irc.freenode.net) !
If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to
2009/6/2 Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net:
:: lacks that confusion. It does have the additional complication of
needing quoted or escaped in the shell, but users are supposed to do a
--pretend anyway, and after it doesn't output what's expected, a user of
any shell experience at all should
Denis Dupeyron wrote:
In my manifesto [1] I have proposed something significantly different
which simply consists in spinning the long discussions off the
council meetings using more focused groups
++
I've seen this used to good effect on projects at work. The only
challenge might be the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alec Warner wrote:
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 4:21 AM, Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
hk...@gentoo.org wrote:
Duncan wrote:
Patrick Börjesson psychoti...@lavabit.com posted
20090529201741.gb11...@nexon.nexus, excerpted below, on Fri, 29 May 2009
22:17:41
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) schrieb:
Why is a custom set less convenient?
Well, instead of emerge --trialware package you would first have to edit
your
@trialware set and then emerge @trialware. The same goes for when you want
to
remove some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Duncan schrieb:
Patrick Börjesson psychoti...@lavabit.com posted
20090529201741.gb11...@nexon.nexus, excerpted below, on Fri, 29 May 2009
22:17:41 +0200:
Why exactly would you want to use --oneshot for a leaf package that is
not depended on by
24 matches
Mail list logo
