Re: [gentoo-dev] New category for Lua related packages

2010-11-02 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 11/2/10 4:24 AM, Rafael Goncalves Martins wrote: I think that a first step should be create a new category, maybe called dev-lua, for all the Lua related stuff. Just checking: how many packages would be in the new category? Generally sounds good. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP

Re: [gentoo-dev] New category for Lua related packages

2010-11-02 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 04:24, Rafael Goncalves Martins rafaelmart...@gentoo.org wrote: I think that a first step should be create a new category, maybe called dev-lua, for all the Lua related stuff. +1. Cheers, Dirkjan

Re: [gentoo-dev] Google Code-In: 13-18 year olds in open source

2010-11-02 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 09:11 Fri 29 Oct , Donnie Berkholz wrote: We now have 2 ideas. It's not even worth applying unless we can get closer to 10. If nobody puts up more ideas in the next ~6 hours, we won't be participating this year. Thanks to your help, we got enough ideas just in time to apply. We

Re: [gentoo-dev] New category for Lua related packages

2010-11-02 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 08:09 Tue 02 Nov , Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: On 11/2/10 4:24 AM, Rafael Goncalves Martins wrote: I think that a first step should be create a new category, maybe called dev-lua, for all the Lua related stuff. Just checking: how many packages would be in the new category? In case

[gentoo-dev] Lastrite: acerhk and acer_acpi

2010-11-02 Thread Samuli Suominen
# Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (02 Nov 2010) # acerhk fails to build with Linux = 2.6.30 wrt #277598 # acer_acpi is included in Linux since = 2.6.25 wrt #208577 # and fails parallel make too # Removal in 30 days app-laptop/acerhk app-laptop/acer_acpi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in server profiles

2010-11-02 Thread Markos Chandras
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 08:41:34PM +0300, Peter Volkov wrote: В Вск, 31/10/2010 в 16:38 +0200, Alex Alexander пишет: On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 11:50:02AM +, Markos Chandras wrote: On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 10:59:08PM -0400, Richard Freeman wrote: Isn't this essentially what the default

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-apps/portage: portage-2.2.0_alpha1.ebuild portage-2.2_rc67.ebuild ChangeLog portage-2.2.0_alpha3.ebuild portage-2.2.0_alpha2.ebuild

2010-11-02 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Monday 01 November 2010 13:33:47 Zac Medico (zmedico) wrote: zmedico 10/11/01 16:33:47 Modified: portage-2.2.0_alpha1.ebuild portage-2.2_rc67.ebuild ChangeLog portage-2.2.0_alpha3.ebuild portage-2.2.0_alpha2.ebuild Log:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in server profiles

2010-11-02 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02-11-2010 19:30, Markos Chandras wrote: - - ewarn This profile has not been tested thoroughly and is not considered to be - - ewarn a supported server profile at this time. For a supported server - - ewarn

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in server profiles

2010-11-02 Thread Markos Chandras
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 10:23:36PM -0100, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02-11-2010 19:30, Markos Chandras wrote: - - ewarn This profile has not been tested thoroughly and is not considered to be - - ewarn a supported

[gentoo-dev] re-assigning SynCE bugs to me

2010-11-02 Thread Iain Buchanan
Hi hwoarang, I noticed you've reassigned a bunch of SynCE bugs to me (which is fine, since I guess I'm the meta...) but I was wondering if there was some request from mescalinum, or if you're just being proactive? I haven't heard from him for a while, so I might be without a dev to commit any

[gentoo-dev] Re: re-assigning SynCE bugs to me

2010-11-02 Thread Markos Chandras
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 09:19:51AM +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote: Hi hwoarang, I noticed you've reassigned a bunch of SynCE bugs to me (which is fine, since I guess I'm the meta...) but I was wondering if there was some request from mescalinum, or if you're just being proactive? I haven't

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: re-assigning SynCE bugs to me

2010-11-02 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Tue, 2 Nov 2010 23:59:36 + Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: I noticed you've reassigned a bunch of SynCE bugs to me mescalinum is being retired due to extensive inactivity In that case, with no committer, it ought to be either a herd or maintainer-needed. jer

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-apps/portage: portage-2.2.0_alpha1.ebuild portage-2.2_rc67.ebuild ChangeLog portage-2.2.0_alpha3.ebuild portage-2.2.0_alpha2.ebuild

2010-11-02 Thread Zac Medico
On 11/02/2010 03:20 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote: On Monday 01 November 2010 13:33:47 Zac Medico (zmedico) wrote: zmedico 10/11/01 16:33:47 Modified: portage-2.2.0_alpha1.ebuild portage-2.2_rc67.ebuild ChangeLog portage-2.2.0_alpha3.ebuild

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: re-assigning SynCE bugs to me

2010-11-02 Thread Markos Chandras
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 01:12:16AM +0100, Jeroen Roovers wrote: On Tue, 2 Nov 2010 23:59:36 + Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: I noticed you've reassigned a bunch of SynCE bugs to me mescalinum is being retired due to extensive inactivity In that case, with no

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: re-assigning SynCE bugs to me

2010-11-02 Thread Iain Buchanan
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 01:12 +0100, Jeroen Roovers wrote: On Tue, 2 Nov 2010 23:59:36 + Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: I noticed you've reassigned a bunch of SynCE bugs to me mescalinum is being retired due to extensive inactivity In that case, with no committer, it