[gentoo-dev] [PATCH python-utils-r1] Add python_optimize() to compile Python modules by hand.

2012-11-25 Thread Michał Górny
--- gx86/eclass/python-utils-r1.eclass | 63 ++ 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/gx86/eclass/python-utils-r1.eclass b/gx86/eclass/python-utils-r1.eclass index ad56919..29101b2 100644 --- a/gx86/eclass/python-utils-r1.eclass +++

[gentoo-dev] RFC: intel-sdp.eclass unpacking speedup

2012-11-25 Thread justin
Hi, Change of the unpacking logic which allows at least a speed up of factor 2. Before we unpacked every single rpm from the tarball separately, now we generate all possibilities and unpack them at once, ignoring warnings. Justin commit f13912b377189f6b80d05eb122c9f27e187c02a6 Author: Justin

Re: [gentoo-dev] proposal for consistency between {RUBY,PYTHON,PHP}_TARGETS

2012-11-25 Thread hasufell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/24/2012 03:30 PM, Theo Chatzimichos wrote: Hello, We currently have values like the following: RUBY_TARGETS=ruby19 PHP_TARGETS=php5-3 PYTHON_TARGETS=python2_7 I find it confusing, and I would like to propose to keep the same style for

[gentoo-dev] fixing LICENSE issues without reporting bugs

2012-11-25 Thread hasufell
The discussion came up in the thread [gentoo-dev] open season on other-dev's packages -- policy change? License issues seem trivial enough (at least regarding the functionality of an ebuild) to be fixed without permission of the actual maintainer. Even if the fix is wrong the ebuild remains

Re: [gentoo-dev] fixing LICENSE issues without reporting bugs

2012-11-25 Thread Ulrich Mueller
On Sun, 25 Nov 2012, hasufell wrote: License issues seem trivial enough (at least regarding the functionality of an ebuild) to be fixed without permission of the actual maintainer. Certainly there are trivial license issues, but not all of them are. See bugs 436452 and 441734 for trivial

Re: [gentoo-dev] fixing LICENSE issues without reporting bugs

2012-11-25 Thread Roy Bamford
On 2012.11.25 13:44, Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Sun, 25 Nov 2012, hasufell wrote: License issues seem trivial enough (at least regarding the functionality of an ebuild) to be fixed without permission of the actual maintainer. Certainly there are trivial license issues, but not all of

Re: [gentoo-dev] proposal for consistency between {RUBY,PYTHON,PHP}_TARGETS

2012-11-25 Thread Peter Stuge
Ole Markus With wrote: Maybe I could change the currently masked php5-5 slot to php5_5 instead and then eventually phase our the hyphen based slots. This would mean inconsistency between the php slots for some time, but eventual consistency with Python, which I do see as a good thing. I think

Re: [gentoo-dev] fixing LICENSE issues without reporting bugs

2012-11-25 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Roy Bamford neddyseag...@gentoo.org wrote: From the point of view of the licencor, the licence is just as important as the code, so there are no trivial licence issues. As a trustee, I am unhappy with losing the traceability at all. Other trustees may have

Re: [gentoo-dev] fixing LICENSE issues without reporting bugs

2012-11-25 Thread Ulrich Mueller
On Sun, 25 Nov 2012, Rich Freeman wrote: On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Roy Bamford neddyseag...@gentoo.org wrote: From the point of view of the licencor, the licence is just as important as the code, so there are no trivial licence issues. As a trustee, I am unhappy with losing the

Re: [gentoo-dev] fixing LICENSE issues without reporting bugs

2012-11-25 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote: But there _are_ trivial cases (e.g., most of the init script issues, bug 425702) where a simple ChangeLog entry would be enough for traceability. I think something like that is best announced first, and then done if there

Re: [gentoo-dev] fixing LICENSE issues without reporting bugs

2012-11-25 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: The key words are serious or contact from the copyright holder. Sorry - revise that a little: 1. Serious and they don't get a timely response from the maintainer (or licenses@g.o). or 2. Contact from the copyright holder.

Re: [gentoo-dev] open season on other-dev's packages -- policy change?

2012-11-25 Thread Rick Zero_Chaos Farina
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/25/2012 02:01 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote: On 11/23/12 22:32, Thomas Sachau wrote: Ian Stakenvicius schrieb: On 22/11/12 11:22 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 08:22:10PM -0600, Donnie Berkholz wrote: On 11:11 Sun 18 Nov

Re: [gentoo-dev] fixing LICENSE issues without reporting bugs

2012-11-25 Thread Roy Bamford
On 2012.11.25 14:42, Rich Freeman wrote: On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Roy Bamford neddyseag...@gentoo.org wrote: From the point of view of the licencor, the licence is just as important as the code, so there are no trivial licence issues. As a trustee, I am unhappy with losing the

Re: [gentoo-dev] open season on other-dev's packages -- policy change?

2012-11-25 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina zeroch...@gentoo.org wrote: If you horribly break my package, you may hear about it, but you certainly won't get yelled at for fixing my bugs or bumping a package. While I think there is a balance to be found, keep in mind that you as

[gentoo-dev] New eclass cuda.eclass

2012-11-25 Thread Justin
Hi, I would like to introduce a new eclass for packages using the nvidia cuda compiler suite. Currently the eclass simply sanitize the NVCCFLAGS. May be extended in the future. Two problems come up with using nvcc: * Each version only supports a limited number of gcc versions. Therefore we need

Re: [gentoo-dev] open season on other-dev's packages -- policy change?

2012-11-25 Thread Rick Zero_Chaos Farina
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/25/2012 10:51 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina zeroch...@gentoo.org wrote: If you horribly break my package, you may hear about it, but you certainly won't get yelled at for fixing my bugs or

Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass cuda.eclass

2012-11-25 Thread Rick Zero_Chaos Farina
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/25/2012 11:47 AM, Justin wrote: Hi, I would like to introduce a new eclass for packages using the nvidia cuda compiler suite. Currently the eclass simply sanitize the NVCCFLAGS. May be extended in the future. Two problems come up with

Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass cuda.eclass

2012-11-25 Thread Justin
On 25.11.2012 18:59, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote: On 11/25/2012 11:47 AM, Justin wrote: Hi, I would like to introduce a new eclass for packages using the nvidia cuda compiler suite. Currently the eclass simply sanitize the NVCCFLAGS. May be extended in the future. Two problems come up

Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass cuda.eclass

2012-11-25 Thread Rick Zero_Chaos Farina
On 11/25/2012 02:14 PM, Justin wrote: On 25.11.2012 18:59, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote: On 11/25/2012 11:47 AM, Justin wrote: Hi, I would like to introduce a new eclass for packages using the nvidia cuda compiler suite. Currently the eclass simply sanitize the NVCCFLAGS. May be extended in

Re: [gentoo-dev] open season on other-dev's packages -- policy change?

2012-11-25 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina zeroch...@gentoo.org wrote: If you have a bug on bugzie that is more than a week old and it affects me, you can bet I will fix it and the notification you get will be the one from me closing your bug. If you have an issue with that

[gentoo-dev] net-irc/xchat

2012-11-25 Thread Lars Wendler
Hey list, I'm planning to lastrite net-irc/xchat in the next couple of weeks. Unfortunately my hope that upstream development would be resumed didn't come true. As the code becomes more and more outdated, open unfixed security bugs are present[1][2] and at some point in the future

Re: [gentoo-dev] net-irc/xchat

2012-11-25 Thread Zac Medico
On 11/25/2012 12:27 PM, Lars Wendler wrote: I also planned to release a news through the portage news system as soon as I lastrite xchat so people know how to move over to hexchat. As I never did this before I'd like to have some help concerning this matter. Is there some documentation

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-office/lyx: lyx-2.0.5.ebuild ChangeLog

2012-11-25 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 14:55:06 +0800 Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote: On 11/23/12 21:17, Alexis Ballier wrote: On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 12:45:56 +0800 Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote: On 11/20/12 21:57, Alexis Ballier wrote: On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:10:51 + (UTC) Patrick

Re: [gentoo-dev] net-irc/xchat

2012-11-25 Thread hasufell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/25/2012 09:27 PM, Lars Wendler wrote: Hey list, I'm planning to lastrite net-irc/xchat in the next couple of weeks. Unfortunately my hope that upstream development would be resumed didn't come true. As the code becomes more and more

Re: [gentoo-dev] net-irc/xchat

2012-11-25 Thread Lars Wendler
Am Sonntag 25 November 2012, 22:03:03 schrieb hasufell: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/25/2012 09:27 PM, Lars Wendler wrote: Hey list, I'm planning to lastrite net-irc/xchat in the next couple of weeks. Unfortunately my hope that upstream development would be

Re: [gentoo-dev] net-irc/xchat

2012-11-25 Thread hasufell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Do xchat plugins work in hexchat? That's something for me to find out as well. I maintain the xchat-otr plugin which I would like to continue using in hexchat. just tested xchat-xsys on hexchat and it does work, all commands afais

Re: [gentoo-dev] net-irc/xchat

2012-11-25 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Lars Wendler wrote: I also planned to release a news through the portage news system as soon as I lastrite xchat so people know how to move over to hexchat. As I never did this before I'd like to have some help concerning this matter. Is there some

Re: [gentoo-dev] open season on other-dev's packages -- policy change?

2012-11-25 Thread Rick Zero_Chaos Farina
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/25/2012 02:59 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina zeroch...@gentoo.org wrote: If you have a bug on bugzie that is more than a week old and it affects me, you can bet I will fix it and the

Re: [gentoo-dev] net-irc/xchat

2012-11-25 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Lars Wendler wrote: I also planned to release a news through the portage news system as soon as I lastrite xchat so people know how to move over to hexchat. As I never did this before

Re: [gentoo-dev] net-irc/xchat

2012-11-25 Thread Lars Wendler
Am Sonntag 25 November 2012, 17:26:30 schrieb Mike Gilbert: On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Lars Wendler wrote: I also planned to release a news through the portage news system as soon as I lastrite xchat so people

[gentoo-dev] Re: net-irc/xchat

2012-11-25 Thread Denis M. (Phr33d0m)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/25/2012 09:27 PM, Lars Wendler wrote: Hey list, I'm planning to lastrite net-irc/xchat in the next couple of weeks. Unfortunately my hope that upstream development would be resumed didn't come true. As the code becomes more and more

[gentoo-dev] Re: net-irc/xchat

2012-11-25 Thread Denis M. (Phr33d0m)
On 11/25/2012 09:27 PM, Lars Wendler wrote: Hey list, I'm planning to lastrite net-irc/xchat in the next couple of weeks. Unfortunately my hope that upstream development would be resumed didn't come true. As the code becomes more and more outdated, open unfixed security bugs are

[gentoo-dev] New global use-flag [pax_kernel]

2012-11-25 Thread Matthew Thode
pax_kernel is used by 21 packages. The description would generally be 'make changes to the package so it works under a pax enabled kernel'. Currently it is used to either patch or (inclusive) to pax mark. What think you? -- -- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire) signature.asc Description:

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2012-11-25 23h59 UTC

2012-11-25 Thread Robin H. Johnson
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2012-11-25 23h59 UTC. Removals: app-portage/pyGPG 2012-11-19 02:56:38 dolsen net-im/jabberd 2012-11-20 19:19:59 hwoarang

Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass cuda.eclass

2012-11-25 Thread C. Bergström
On 11/26/12 12:59 AM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/25/2012 11:47 AM, Justin wrote: Hi, I would like to introduce a new eclass for packages using the nvidia cuda compiler suite. Currently the eclass simply sanitize the NVCCFLAGS. May be

Re: [gentoo-dev] New global use-flag [pax_kernel]

2012-11-25 Thread Alec Warner
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Matthew Thode prometheanf...@gentoo.org wrote: pax_kernel is used by 21 packages. The description would generally be 'make changes to the package so it works under a pax enabled kernel'. Currently it is used to either patch or (inclusive) to pax mark. What

Re: [gentoo-dev] New global use-flag [pax_kernel]

2012-11-25 Thread Matthew Thode
On 11/25/2012 07:02 PM, Alec Warner wrote: On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Matthew Thode prometheanf...@gentoo.org wrote: pax_kernel is used by 21 packages. The description would generally be 'make changes to the package so it works under a pax enabled kernel'. Currently it is used to

Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass cuda.eclass

2012-11-25 Thread justin
On 26/11/12 01:26, C. Bergström wrote: On 11/26/12 12:59 AM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/25/2012 11:47 AM, Justin wrote: Hi, I would like to introduce a new eclass for packages using the nvidia cuda compiler suite. Currently the eclass