On 11/30/2012 09:55 PM, Alec Warner wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 30/11/12 12:30 PM, Alec Warner wrote:
How about we not change the docs until someone eagerly implements
all the stuff you just said?
Well, using emerge-webrsync for
On 11/30/2012 01:06 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
On 30/11/12 12:30 PM, Alec Warner wrote:
How about we not change the docs until someone eagerly implements
all the stuff you just said?
Well, using emerge-webrsync for grabbing the initial snapshot during
an installation still makes sense
On 11/30/2012 12:30 PM, Alec Warner wrote:
How about we not change the docs until someone eagerly implements all
the stuff you just said?
Note that from an infra POV our existing system works fairly well and
requires no day-to-day tinkering.
I'm always happy to consider new options, but
Hi!
Feel free to take care of the following packages that I used to
maintain a while ago but don't anymore due to change of interest:
- RAID controller utils:
sys-block/afacli(older Adaptec)
sys-block/dellmgr (older Dell-branded LSI MegaRAID)
sys-block/hpacucli (HP/Compaq
Hi,
net-im/skype needs a maintainer. It's currently maintained by the
net-im team which is not very active.
If you look at the ChangeLog you will see that for the past few years
random developers are trying to keep it
up to date ( and thanks for that! ). However it would be nice to find
a
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Tomáš Chvátal tomas.chva...@gmail.com wrote:
Dne Pá 30. listopadu 2012 20:37:22, Pacho Ramos napsal(a):
media-sound/logitechmediaserver-bin - this package is special, it's
maintained by a proxy maintainer but it was reassigned to
maintainer-needed instead of
Dne So 1. prosince 2012 06:42:13, Rich Freeman napsal(a):
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Tomáš Chvátal tomas.chva...@gmail.com
wrote:
Dne Pá 30. listopadu 2012 20:37:22, Pacho Ramos napsal(a):
media-sound/logitechmediaserver-bin - this package is special, it's
maintained by a proxy
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 7:32 AM, Tomáš Chvátal tomas.chva...@gmail.com wrote:
Bundling few libs and bundling 40 of them is bit of difference, will YOU do
the audit?
We don't require security audits for packages to be in portage. Any
package can have a security problem, whether it is in a
On Dec 1, 2012 5:01 AM, Wolfram Schlich wschl...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi!
Feel free to take care of the following packages that I used to
maintain a while ago but don't anymore due to change of interest:
sys-block/tw_cli(3ware)
dev-db/mysql-proxy
If you're interested in any of
On 01/12/2012 01:59, Wolfram Schlich wrote:
- RAID controller utils:
Maybe we should add sysadmin herd as fallback for these?
sys-block/hpacucli(HP/Compaq Smart Array)
This one I can help with in the immediate future since I have a couple
of servers needing it at work.
sys-process/fcron
On Thursday 29 November 2012 23:37:18 Duncan wrote:
Obviously that specific solution won't work for the multiple blas/
whatever packages, since it's single-package/multi-version specific, but
is there some variant of it that could work, keeping the code out of
eclasses where the
On 01/12/12 12:55, Markos Chandras wrote:
Hi,
net-im/skype needs a maintainer. It's currently maintained by the
net-im team which is not very active.
If you look at the ChangeLog you will see that for the past few years
random developers are trying to keep it
up to date ( and thanks for that!
On 01/12/12 23:50, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 01/12/12 12:55, Markos Chandras wrote:
Hi,
net-im/skype needs a maintainer. It's currently maintained by the
net-im team which is not very active.
If you look at the ChangeLog you will see that for the past few years
random developers are trying to
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 09:35:07AM -0800, Zac Medico wrote:
However, I'm not aware of gnu tar's incremental archive. If it's much
faster than the above, then it should probably replace
emerge-delta-webrsync.
If it has benefits over the current diffball approach used by
So Thomáš posted today [1] that the new LibreOffice 4 is going to _need_
an LDAP provider in the future because they are not going to keep it
optional as it is now. Right now, the only provider we have in portage
(as far as me and him can tell) is openldap (although mozldap also exists).
This
Tomáš Chvátal schrieb:
Bundling few libs and bundling 40 of them is bit of difference, will YOU do
the audit?
Also other teams actively work on the unbundling, while there is track of no
will to actually make it buildable with system libs.
Also the security is not the only problem here,
Diego Elio Pettenò schrieb:
In
the mean time, I would suggest that, since the desktop profiles already
have USE=ldap enabled, we should default on the same profiles to
net-nds/openldap minimal
to make sure that the default desktop users don't get a copy of openldap
(server) installed.
I
Rich Freeman posted on Sat, 01 Dec 2012 08:46:34 -0500 as excerpted:
And if we force some types of packages to be masked all the time, then
what do we do if we actually need to mask them for removal or security.
Users won't even realize they have a known flaw, because they had to
unmask the
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Rich Freeman posted on Sat, 01 Dec 2012 08:46:34 -0500 as excerpted:
And if we force some types of packages to be masked all the time, then
what do we do if we actually need to mask them for removal or security.
Users won't
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
Look, if you want to make a policy about the stuff, then make a
policy, get council approval, and write it down.
Don't make up silly half-solutions.
Sure, but I'm not aware of any policy at all concerning packages that
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
Look, if you want to make a policy about the stuff, then make a
policy, get council approval, and write it down.
Don't make up silly half-solutions.
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn posted on Sun, 02 Dec 2012 01:28:26 +0100 as
excerpted:
If this change is applied anyway, I suggest to at least produce a news
item in order to not surprise users about the sudden loss of their
openldap server.
I wouldn't object to a news item. More information
On 12/01/2012 09:48 PM, Duncan wrote:
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn posted on Sun, 02 Dec 2012 01:28:26 +0100 as
excerpted:
If this change is applied anyway, I suggest to at least produce a news
item in order to not surprise users about the sudden loss of their
openldap server.
I wouldn't
On 01/12/2012 19:44, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
Someone's going to reboot three months after this change and their whole
office is going to be down while they try to figure out why they don't
have an LDAP server. For even a small business, that could mean
thousands of dollars.
Ha ha, you
On 12/01/2012 10:50 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
On 01/12/2012 19:44, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
Someone's going to reboot three months after this change and their whole
office is going to be down while they try to figure out why they don't
have an LDAP server. For even a small business, that
On 01/12/2012 20:09, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
The only way to know what's going on is to read the ebuild. And nobody
has the time to do that for every default USE flag change, especially
when you're managing multiple machines.
In this case, USE=-minimal is really USE=make_it_work_at_all, for
On 12/1/2012 22:21, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
If anything, what you just say would call for making openldap follow the
39 packages already out there using IUSE=+server, so that there is no
doubt that changing the default on desktop profile from USE=-minimal to
USE=-server means that _you're
On 12/01/2012 11:21 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
On 01/12/2012 20:09, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
The only way to know what's going on is to read the ebuild. And nobody
has the time to do that for every default USE flag change, especially
when you're managing multiple machines.
In this case,
On 01/12/2012 20:50, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
And most people don't even know that metadata.xml exists.
But I do expect them to know `equery uses` like Dustin said. The fact
that some flags are not clearly described in metadata.xml is another
problem.
In my previous message, I said, but you
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
I just get annoyed with the don't use Gentoo unless you like your
stuff broken attitude.
Don't confuse stuff changing with stuff breaking - they are very
different things.
In Gentoo stuff changes every single day. I heard that gentoo-x86
gets some number of commits per
Peter Stuge wrote:
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
I just get annoyed with the don't use Gentoo unless you like your
stuff broken attitude.
Don't confuse stuff changing with stuff breaking - they are very
different things.
In Gentoo stuff changes every single day. I heard that gentoo-x86
gets some
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 12/01/2012 09:48 PM, Duncan wrote:
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn posted on Sun, 02 Dec 2012 01:28:26 +0100 as
excerpted:
If this change is applied anyway, I suggest to at least produce a news
item in order to not surprise users about the sudden loss of their
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 9:27 PM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
I just get annoyed with the don't use Gentoo unless you like your
stuff broken attitude.
Don't confuse stuff changing with stuff breaking - they are very
different things.
In Gentoo stuff changes
33 matches
Mail list logo
